When starts collide - progressed synastry

Topic Closed

Lindaland

Astrology

When starts collide - progressed synastry (Page 10)

profile | register | preferences | faq

This topic has been transferred to this forum: Interpersonal Astrology.
This topic is 11 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Author	Topic: When starts collide - progressed synastry
hanakin Knowflake Posts: 235 From: Registered: May 2009	posted May 29, 2009 06:33 PM Yes in Paul 's book they are listed as one of the only couples who really seem to have been together and gotten together not involving any progression but more like love sure and simple... Is the conjunction between a personal planet and someone's ascendant that strong? IP: Logged
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 01, 2009 11:45 AM Sorry, yes, it was Sun-ASC. Well, Paul said himself that it only works in about 80% of the cases for conventional relationships. There are of course relationships that also get formed during Venus-mars-square or similiar aspects (often they are pretty stormy, passionate and somewhat dysfunctional); it also depends on what you expect to find in a relationship and are looking out for. Apart from that I have to repeat, with the adding of the angles (ASC as Mars-point, DSC as Venus-point), I haven´t seen it fail even once. I mean: every relationship that came into existence had at least one of these aspects during their beginning. And yes,personal planets to ASC are THAT important. ALSO, this theory doesn`t say anything about the likeness of a lasting relationship; it just states that certain aspects are usually / often present when a relationship begins. That`s all. IP: Logged
katatonic unregistered	posted June 01, 2009 12:52 PM DD hope this isn't too far off-topic. i noticed your question in IQ's ?? thread about bride-groom asteroids...the closest i found to bride was briede - is that what you use or is there an actual bride asteroid? IP: Logged
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 01, 2009 12:59 PM Yes, it`s the one we use. Asteroids, that have a "close" sound, seem to work like the actual word, too. Yet, I have noticed far stronger patterns with Groom and Boda, than aspects to Briede, even if they are present. EDIT: I`m still not completely sure which meaning and significance these "two rocks in space" actually have. IP: Logged
katatonic unregistered	posted June 01, 2009 01:26 PM well briede seems to fit well in my chart - it's conjunct my ex husbands sun and opposite that of someone else - and groom conjuncts both their jupiters (ex hubby's pretty wide really) and my vesta......... does boda have mythological significance of some kind? doesn't ring a bell for me! IP: Logged
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 01, 2009 02:51 PM No, those aren`t mythological asteroids. Boda means marriage (in Spanish I think) IP: Logged
katatonic unregistered	posted June 01, 2009 03:05 PM bingo! you're right. marriage or wedding, in spanish! thanks... IP: Logged
Metatron Knowflake Posts: 168 From: Slovenia Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 01, 2009 06:10 PM Hey DD How about mars on someones DC in progressions? I have my directed mars on the girls natal DC. Would that count as mars/venus contact?? IP: Logged
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 02, 2009 05:22 AM Yes, I would count it. IP: Logged
hanakin Knowflake Posts: 235 From: Registered: May 2009	posted June 04, 2009 10:17 AM Hey DD, thanks for your input, yeah I've read about the paul mccartney and linda love story quite unbelievable they were attached at the hips. Now talking of squares between lovers Ava Gardner and Frank Sinatra...dysfunctional. IP: Logged
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 04, 2009 10:19 AM Yes, those two really were dysfunctional. Well, there are other reasons Paul and LInda were so close; I think if I remember it right they had strong aspects between important houserulers. IP: Logged
hanakin Knowflake Posts: 235 From: Registered: May 2009	posted June 04, 2009 10:37 AM I once tried to have a normal relationship with a guy with whom the synastry was fantastic. But in natal I have venus opposition mars, it really bored me after two weeks. I ended it. I think i'm much more prone to being attracted to dysfunctional sh..! :-( i'm going to try and post their synastry (paul and linda). IP: Logged
Lara Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Dec 2011	posted June 18, 2009 06:18 PM bump IP: Logged
woah city Knowflake Posts: 578 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 20, 2009 04:12 AM hey DD! are you counting transits to the natal and progressed charts as well? meaning, transits when the relationship started? if so, we have several of these!! remarkable. IP: Logged
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 21, 2009 07:24 AM Woah City, transits were not part of Westran`s study. BUT personally I think transits may be the exact timers. The progressions will be valid for quite some time, and maybe transits show the most likely moments for a relationship to occur. I haven`t researched that though. IP: Logged
Nine Moderator Posts: 1880 From: The Cusp of Love Registered: May 2009	posted June 22, 2009 01:48 PM quote: Well, there are other reasons Paul and LInda were so close; I think if I remember it right they had strong aspects between important houserulers. Additionally, Paul was born on the 18th, ruled by Mars, and Linda was born on the 24th, ruled by Venus. Classic Male-Female dynamic. They were connected on many different levels. IP: Logged
Quinnie Knowflake Posts: 1206 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 23, 2009 04:38 AM I have just discovered this thread, (so I haven't read everyone's posts) ... Can we include the Moon?.... The progressed Moon aspecting the other's natal ascendant for example. In my case my ascendant is Libra though, maybe that has Venus influence. IP: Logged
Quinnie Knowflake Posts: 1206 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 23, 2009 04:40 AM I just checked it again and in my chart... progressed Venus conjunct my natal ascendant by teo degrees when my relationship with my partner started. His progressed Moon was on my ascendant too. IP: Logged
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted June 23, 2009 05:50 AM Paul Westran didn`t include Moon-aspects. I guess mainly because the birthtime was not certain in some cases. Another reason could be that Moon might relate more to an emotional connection, but not necessarily a romantic relation. IP: Logged
EighthMoon Knowflake Posts: 115 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted October 21, 2009 06:26 AM Bump for JChristine... 8th IP: Logged
Nine Moderator Posts: 1880 From: The Cusp of Love Registered: May 2009	posted October 21, 2009 10:10 AM quote: I have just discovered this thread, (so I haven't read everyone's posts) ... Can we include the Moon?.... The progressed Moon aspecting the other's natal ascendant for example. In my case my ascendant is Libra though, maybe that has Venus influence. In my own experience I tend to attract a lot of pMoon in Gemini (my Sun) & pMoon in Virgo (my ascendant) I say yes, the moon is indicative of bringing people together. IP: Logged
EighthMoon Knowflake Posts: 115 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted October 21, 2009 07:26 PM I read on Westran's site that he does include moon only when he is certain of birthtime. 8th IP: Logged
DiandraReborn25 unregistered	posted October 27, 2009 07:31 PM hi 8Moon someone was looking for these too on the astrology2 hihihi thank you! IP: Logged
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009	posted March 30, 2010 04:48 AM bump IP: Logged
Ceridwen Moderator Posts: 12705 From: Registered: Jul 2011	posted December 19, 2011 01:48 AM bump IP: Logged

This topic is 11 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 All times are Eastern Standard Time	next newest topic \| next oldest topic
Administrative Options: Open Topic \| Archive/Move \| Delete Topic
	Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com