Posts: 738
From: California, USA
Registered: Feb 2003

posted September 03, 2003 12:28 AM         

---

Rockers, rapper, and poppers all have a rebellion complex, ie a need to go against cultural standards in order to celebrate the triumph of idiocy and slobbishness. Classical listeners, on the other hand, are all very civilized and polite and so never do anything obtrusive.

My ananlysis.

------------------
Hello everybody! I used to be QueenofSheeba and then I was Apollo and now I am QueenofSheeba again (and I'm a guy in case you didn't know)!

IP: Logged

Posts: 2641
From:
Registered: Apr 2001

posted September 26, 2003 04:39 AM         

---

I need to correct a couple of things.

Adapa was not the first procreative Earthling, he was the first civilized human, his mate was Titi. Adamu was the first perfected prototype, and Ti-Amat the first female. They were at first not producing offspring, so were genetically altered to do so.

From the book, The Lost Book of Enki ...

With the life essence of Anunnaki males and females they were compared.

Like two entwined serpents Ningishzidda (Thoth) the essences separated,

Arranged like twenty-two branches on a tree of life were the essences,

Their bits were comparable, the images and likenesses they properly determined.

Twenty-two they were in number; the ability to procreate they did not include!

(so the Anunnaki had to fix the problem!)

... From the rib of Enki the life essence he extracted,

Into the rib of Adamu the life essence he inserted;

From the rib of Ninmah the life essence he extracted,

Into the rib of Ti-Amat the life essence he inserted.

... To their Tree of Life two branches have been added,

With procreating powers their life essences are now entwined!

--------------

So, the Anunnaki added some more of their genetic code into proto-humanity, and I must say the procedure was amazingly similar to modern day gene therapy!

So the proto-humans multiplied, but through generations of breeding, the Earthlings began to revert back into their original forms - shaggy hair all over the body, etc. This is when Adapa, the Biblical Adam, came to be through more direct methods of genetic alteration.

IP: Logged

Posts: 374
From: beautiful, hidden mountain village, BC, Canada
Registered: Aug 2003

posted September 26, 2003 02:10 PM         

---

Wow...I'm sorry I didn't notice this thread before. It is certainly true, Queen of Sheeba, that one can debate the accuracy of anthropoligical reports and translations. However, Ra does have a solid point about the Sumerians. They did record a lot of knowledge that would appear illogical for ancient races to have accessed. I have been an Archaeologist and Historian for quite some time, and have looked at both the scientific and esoteric explanations of why and how some of this advanced knowledge made its way into ancient civilizations. There are many esoteric answers and explanations, and I suppose that one could choose those that seem to make the most sense. There is only one scientific answer to how ancients came by some extremely complicated information....we don't know. We don't know how the Sumerians got their information, but we do know they had it. We don't know how the people who created the Nazca lines figured out methods of large scale construction, but we know they did it. (BTW...there are several good hypotheses about why they did it that don't involve alien landing strips.) There are mysteries yet to be answered about life and the universe and everything. For myself, I would be as uncomfortable deciding that extraterrestrial influence on the earth is impossible as I would deciding that it is imperative. There are definitely some answers hidden in ancient texts, but how the translations are made and what interpretations can be gleaned from those translations...well that can be a bit subjective. Like statistics, one can interpret those things in many ways. With any luck, I'll get to work a dig on Mars someday and get some more answers. That said...no amount of education or experience makes one person the ultimate authority on a subject and I don't mean to represent myself as someone who knows any more than anyone else. I've just been thinking about these topics for a while and hoped to add to the discussion.

IP: Logged

Posts: 2641
From:
Registered: Apr 2001

posted September 26, 2003 03:23 PM         

---

VERY well said, FishKitten!

Welcome to the discussions!

What do you think about the images in the "What Happened in Mars" string?

IP: Logged

Posts: 16464
From: Columbus, GA USA
Registered: Nov 2000

posted September 27, 2003 03:39 PM         

---

------------------
"Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark

IP: Logged

Posts: 374
From: beautiful, hidden mountain village, BC, Canada
Registered: Aug 2003

posted September 29, 2003 05:42 PM         

---

Hmmm. I just had a chance to check out the "What Happened to Mars" string. Very interesting stuff. It's hard to say about the "vegetation" one. Could also be some kind of crystalline formations. The tubes don't look natural at all. I actually did a bit of study on dunes and never saw anything like that or heard of any way something like that could be made from natural wind and sand action. The types of dunes that exist are pretty well known and identified, and those just aren't in the category. Even if you went with frozen dunes or ones affected by water or tornadoes...just doesn't work for the tubes. The picture under the ones of tubes with the T shaped object. Looks extremely anthropogenic. If Archaeologists on Earth saw such a figure, they'd immediately investigate. It looks almost like megalithic burial chambers (mounds or barrows) that have been uncovered through time by wind and / or water action. You don't usually see large T shapes in nature. The face - well I always thought that gave a lot of creedence to the probability that intelligent life must have been on Mars at some point. Now they ("they" being NASA and the scientific news groups) are saying it is just a trick of light and shadows, but I have my doubts about that. Espceially when you look at its relation to those pyramids. Very reminiscent of the proximity of the sphinx to pyramids in Egypt. Plus, the similarities in style and shape of the pyramids to those in Eypt are very interesting. Of course, all pyramids on Earth don't look the same, so one would expect some diversity in space. My impression of all the photos is that although we cannot say that we know the anomolies are made by intelligent beings, we have to accept that there is a chance they were. We don't see anything else like that anywhere in nature. But we see lots of it made by men.

IP: Logged

Posts: 16464
From: Columbus, GA USA
Registered: Nov 2000

posted September 30, 2003 01:34 PM         

---

Very wise observations!

------------------
"Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark

IP: Logged

Posts: 374
From: beautiful, hidden mountain village, BC, Canada
Registered: Aug 2003

posted September 30, 2003 05:24 PM         

---

Thanks Randall.

IP: Logged

Posts: 16464
From: Columbus, GA USA
Registered: Nov 2000

posted October 01, 2003 03:23 AM         

---

I'd like to hear a NASA "scientist" trying to explain away those solid arguments.

------------------
"Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark

IP: Logged

Posts: 2641
From:
Registered: Apr 2001

posted October 01, 2003 03:43 AM         

---

Thank you for your professional opinion on this, FishKitten! It is wonderful to have your knowledgable perspective!!

IP: Logged

Posts: 374
From: beautiful, hidden mountain village, BC, Canada
Registered: Aug 2003

posted October 01, 2003 03:29 PM         

---

Thanks guys. (blush) Actually, all those mysteries like the Pyramids, Stonehenge, ancient texts, etc. etc. are why I got into Archaeology and History. I have always been driven to find out as much as I could. And I have always been fascinated by the way such things capture our imaginations and excite our minds even thousands of years later. Must be something to it.

IP: Logged

Posts: 16464
From: Columbus, GA USA
Registered: Nov 2000

posted October 02, 2003 02:35 PM         

---

------------------
"Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark

IP: Logged