posted January 18, 2008 11:43 AM              

tada!!!!!!!!

posted January 18, 2008 12:18 PM            

You would love Bavaria. We live in a town outside of Schweinfurt called Schwebenried. Our house is just outside of the village and hidden in the tree line. With the warmer weather recently, the fields are starting to green up and I can't wait until Spring (if we stay here). We are due to move to Grafenwohr within a few months, but it is still in Bavaria. We'll be very close to the Czech border and only 2 1/2 hours from Prague.

I also thought Weisbaden was beautiful when we went down there, especially some of the outlying towns- Ingleheim is gorgeous.

posted January 18, 2008 12:20 PM              

it's just a bit sad it's for this kind of topics and not for the one i posted in Health and Healing concerning much deeper and personnal issues. but anyway, on the topic i posted there, i might mot have had many replies but they were all very precious.

less is more!

but that doesn't mean we shouldn't celebrate the quantity as well.

now if you want to carry on to 200, feel free, but it will be without me. whatever you might reply. i'm done on this topic.

posted January 18, 2008 01:10 PM            

quote:

---

But the idea that one of those “bad people” is jwhop is incorrect?

---

Let me ask you, are these discussions ever about deciding who's a "bad person?" No, they are always about bad behavior. You know this, but instead of taking heed of it you hatched a plan to make Jwhop out to be a bad person, and you stuck with that theme while I never went along with you. Do you see any flaw in what I'm saying?

quote:

---

I did ask you a direct question and really was expecting a direct answer.
You see, the need for any inferences would have not existed if you had just been, well, direct.

---

You did receive a direct answer (I qualified an example of a good person who has chastised Jwhop). You just discarded it as it didn't suit where you wanted to go. Perhaps it was an expectation in your mind that things would go according to how you thought they would or should be. I called it an attempt at entrapment, and the way you played it out -it appears that I was indeed correct in that assumption. Once again instead of recognizing that these conversations are always about poor behavior, you turned it into good people versus bad people.

quote:

---

are they wholly good in your eyes? Were you trying to say that there were people here who are “mostly” good. Mostly is an important word there, you see. Going with the whole shades idea. And if so, are there no wholly bad people here in your eyes?

---

I've already answered this question for you, and I was as clear and direct as I could possibly be:

There are all kinds of shades in between, however. Some people are bad in one area, and good in another. - Me

I reitterated later:

Could I not easily prove anyone here has essentially the same sentiments [Good, Bad, and loads of shades of in between]?

The fact that you ask again proves that you haven't been interested in hearing me. We're now up to two items where you've asked a question, gotten an answer, and not paid attention to the answer received.

I'd like to respond to the rest, but I have to go now.

posted January 18, 2008 02:06 PM            

quote:

---

Here we see a statement that is clearly in opposition to the observable truth. I didn't start this thread, nor did I recruit anyone to this thread.....acoustic

---

quote:

---

Hmmm...something like only reading conservative news, or listening to conservative talk radio, or posting conservative's articles when they align with your thinking? Is that the kind of thing you're talking about?....acoustic

---

quote:

---

Have you noticed...everyone leaves me to it when I get involved in a debate. Also, have you noticed all these people who have come out on your behalf to try to bolster your position here? and the irony just gets thicker and thicker....acoustic

---

quote:

---

Great! You should follow that link and relive the magic by all means. It's not about whether you were speaking to Paras or not (where'd you get that notion?). She had a very clear message for you that's been echoed time and time again, and will continue to echo on for as long as you continue to act like yourself.....acoustic

---

lalalinda

posted January 18, 2008 02:17 PM            

You don't ever want to go there with me. I've got a hell of a memory...which includes what you've upchucked on this forum.

posted January 18, 2008 03:52 PM            

quote:

---

In this case, you've noted all the people who have disagreed with something or all I've said in the past....as though that gives your own argument additional weight.

---

It doesn't give my argument additional weight, it gives every one of those people's argument weight. You misunderstand if you make it about numbers, because the point is the continuous cycle. Everyone who has ever previously criticized you could leave the site altogether, and you could observe the cycle repeat. Same action, same result.

quote:

---

We've had this "shut up" discussion before.

---

quote:

---

I did post on this forum the total number of articles from one of those news sites you repeatedly mention...and the breakdown of where they originated. As I recall, the breakdown was that more than 70% of articles appearing there were a combination of Associated Press, Reuters, NY Times, Boston Globe, LA Times and other leftist news sources.

---

First, when did you do this?

Second, did you tally up your own postings from anywhere?

Do you have a link?

quote:

---

Listen, 26T is astute enough to know exactly whom was being spoken to/about...no matter whom it appeared was being addressed.

---

You still obviously aren't getting it.

quote:

---

There are also alot of us who have opposing views to 'jwhop and his crew's' views. And we have also "backed up statments with quotes, articles and statistics that can call be found online and therefore properly sourced." But those have seemed to have been forgotten about. Or overlooked...ignored? Nooo...all of the quotes, articles and statistics that dont fit in with the certain line of thinking that goes on here are false -- they're all made up, of course!

And it's not about "go pound sand, I am too busy to dig up facts". Facts have been found and posted here - over and over again. But when they dont fit in with certain people's points of veiw, they are disregarded. And it becomes pointless and tiring. I played that game here for awhile and I'm done.

There were alot of people who shared similar views to many of us here, that have dissapeared. I wonder why? They've made countless numbers of intelligent posts - that can also be "backed up" - but were ridiculed for their views. This is not a friendly forum. That - sadly - is why the more intelligent people, tend to stay out of it. - 26T

---

Does that make it any clearer?

quote:

---

You don't ever want to go there with me. I've got a hell of a memory...which includes what you've upchucked on this forum.

---

posted January 18, 2008 03:54 PM              

daf

P.S. This thread stopped being cheeky pages ago. Now it's just mentally challenged.
(Upon deeper reflection, that's probably selling mentally challenged people short by miles.)

posted January 22, 2008 02:35 PM            

quote:

---

It doesn't give my argument additional weight, it gives every one of those people's argument weight...acostic

---

quote:

---

Exactly my point....acoustic

---

quote:

---

First, when did you do this?

---

quote:

---

Second, did you tally up your own postings from anywhere?....acoustic

---

quote:

---

You still obviously aren't getting it.

---

quote:

---

You do have a hell of a selective memory. I'll grant you that...and that alone....acoustic

---

posted January 22, 2008 03:33 PM            

quote:

---

There are 11 peaple in a room acoustic. 10 of those people insist 2+2=5. Obviously, by your reasoning person #11 who insists 2+2=4 is wrong...and the other 10 are right...right?

---

Your premise is off. For it to be correct, you'd have to have a monopoly on being right, which you don't.

Once again, even the people who come to your defense admit that they can see your detractor's perspective on the matter, so really the only person in denial about you is you.

quote:

---

I posted the information on the percentage make up of articles from those news sources you drool over

---

Since when do I drool over news sources? A bit dramatic there.

quote:

---

Don't attempt to say you weren't here and didn't see it. Well, I guess it could just be written off to a poor memory on your part..which would explain a whole lot of your problems.

---

Well, find it and show it to me. Let's find out for certain if it's my poor memory or yours.

quote:

---

I seem to recall it was the World Net Daily site from which I took all the articles for a usual day...found the copyright, did the math and determined that 70% were direct, unaltered reprinted news articles from the various MSM sources you adore.

---

You're saying that I saw this, and let it pass unquestioned? Well, now I'm really curious to see this old post of yours. I can tell you sight unseen that I reject the notion that WorldNetDaily got your pieces from MSM.

quote:

---

I asked you once acoustic, would you like me to post some comments from those who disagree with you..or who have in the past ripped you royally? Should their comments..which are not at all flattering to you be taken as proof there's something wrong with you?

---

I'm glad that you get it.

As to your question, some people have attempted to rip me royally right here in this thread, and it's given me some pause and some introspection. After also looking over some of our previous discussions about you I'm pretty certain that a lot of it stems from those discussions. Our last discussion was on whether or not it was more peaceful here without you. All kinds of people attempted to speak in your defense, but when it came back to my simple argument there wasn't a defense that could prove otherwise. It is precisely because I nor anyone else steps into your shoes that this place goes quiet when you're not around. If I'm not stepping into your shoes, then how can I possibly be equatable to you? The simple answer is that I'm not.

quote:

---

Gee acoustic, I've stored in my personal memory...not on the computer...enough of your bullshiiit remarks, goofs, nonsense and other forms of inadequate, intemperate, assinine, dufus like statements to last me a lifetime. Wanna see some?

---

posted January 26, 2008 02:22 PM            

quote:

---

Well, find it and show it to me. Let's find out for certain if it's my poor memory or yours.....acoustic

---

Your memory can always be depended on...to fail acoustic.

Now, if you think I'm going to read through almost 4000 topics on this forum and about 57,000 posts to find the breakdown I posted on where articles originate which are reprinted on WND...and how many are in house, then you're even nuttier than I already think you are.

This is the breakdown from today...January 26, 2008. These are articles only, no advertisers either external or internal are included.

82 Total articles

26 World Net Daily
56 other sources

26 divided by 80=32
56 divided by 80=68

World Net Daily article breakdown.

32% World Net Daily
68% Other sources....just as I said in the first place acoustic..about 70% of articles on WND are from other sources

World Net Daily articles
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59902
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59890
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59889
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59892
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59903
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59876
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59882
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59907
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59888
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59896
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59884
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59864
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59029
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59909
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59894
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58295
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59891
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59865
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59898
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59899
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59895
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59908
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59901
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59906
http://worldnetdaily.com/letters.asp
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59875