Author
|
Topic: Who Would the Terrorists Vote For??
|
Xodian Moderator Posts: 275 From: Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 16, 2008 01:58 PM
quote: If Israel proposed the very same thing..Israel will not attack Hamas targets except in retaliation for attacks by Hamas for up to 10 years, however Israel will not recognize the right of any Palestinian state to exist; then Xodian, you would be railing about the extremism of Israelis
Jwhop; Not only have you missed the bottom line of the discussion, you are parating a statement that we just discussed about verily and yet you still hold on to it for no good reason. Did I not just say the difference between the moderate faction and the militant faction of Hamas? Did I just not descibe how they are willing to go for the idea of a two state policy? Did I not just tell you that the militants will not need to exist if there was a seperate state of Palestine? How many times do I have to repeat that? IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 18, 2008 04:23 PM
Oh yeah Xodian, I hear you. I just don't think you understand that until the Hamas Cahrter is changed there isn't going to be any agreement involving Israel. Until Palestinian citizens get control of their government you can kiss any peace agreement with Israel goodbye.Let's see, Israel is supposed to agree to a Palestinian state next to Israel? A Palestinian state with a terrorist government, the charter of which says that Israel doesn't have the right to exist and that Israel should be destroyed and Israeli citizens killed? You've got to be kidding me Xodian. That's a fools agreement from the Israeli standpoint. BTW, I didn't miss anything and all the repeating of the same tired rhetoric about "moderate" Hamas is simple hogwash. IP: Logged |
Xodian Moderator Posts: 275 From: Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 19, 2008 03:02 PM
If a moderate government is kept in place of the militant one which already has plans for a two state policy, the moderates would obviously need to follow upon the wishes of an already war-weary Palestine population. As I said, once its been affirmed that there is a clear border division between the two states, the population doesn't need to look upon the militants for protection and obviously they are already tired of the in-fighting between the two opposition parties and would love to see a stabilized Palestinian region. That includes a regional defensive force ONLY and thus we can finally see an end to this war too long prolonged conflict. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 20, 2008 11:16 AM
The Palestinian population doesn't need protection from Israel now Xodian.Hamas and other terrorist groups have killed more Palestinian civilians deliberately than Israel has killed accidentially while retaliating against terrorist attacks by these terrorists. The Palestinian people need to get themselves together, remove Hamas and other terrorist organizations from power, restrain them by whatever means is necessary and write a Palestinian Charter which does not deny Israel the right to exist. Until they do that, everything is just so much blathering which isn't fooling anyone. IP: Logged |
Xodian Moderator Posts: 275 From: Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 21, 2008 07:46 AM
What the Palestinian people need is some sort of a hopeful outlook on the situation. Did you not see how things were finally shaping up when Sharon's plan was making headway? People started questioning the militants and the civil infighting that had plauged the west bank for so long. So if a long term agreement can be made about the problem with the situation, the people themselves will look upon the stability of their region. The groups exist because people feel there is an imminent threat of further land occupation. Once that threat is gone, the people do not need to look upon these militants for protection and they obviously will lose their influence and their platform of support. They'll just crumble from within. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 21, 2008 11:39 PM
When Israel withdrew from contested territory; when Israel forceably removed Israeli settlers from those areas...what Xodian, exactly what the hell was the reaction of Hamas? Futher Xodian, exactly what the hell was Israel's reward for doing so?Let me head you off Xodian and tell you straight out. Hamas claimed a military victory and used the vacated territory to launch missile attacks on Israeli cities and Israeli civilians. There is not going to be peace in the area. First, Hamas doesn't want peace. They want to destroy Israel. Second Xodian Iran, the principle backer of Hamas will not permit it. You must think the people of Israel are totally nuts Xodian...or totally stupid. They've attempted to trade land for peace only to see that it didn't bring peace but rather more directed rocket attacks on Israeli cities and civilians. IP: Logged |
Xodian Moderator Posts: 275 From: Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 22, 2008 08:23 AM
Oh there are plenty of rewards for letting the moderates have their voices heard and have them appointed to power Jwhop.a) Since it will be a negotiated deal between Israel and the Palestinian moderates, Israel will end up gaining a valuable ally on the political front which will certainly see the best interest in both states by creating a prolonged trade agreement. b) The vicotry will not be seen upon a military front since Hamas' main goal obviously was not achieved and the people, who are already weary of the prolonged conflict in the region (remember that they voted Hamas into power because of the fact that Fatah was laden with corruption and they were no better then the extremist Hamas groups.) Now that they will see that Israel is definaltely willing to leave the disputed territories, they can work in tendon with Israelis rather then both sides staying put in fear over a next plausible attack. c) Hamas' militant group will take a hard blow. The negotiated deal will only galvinize the fact that it was TALKS with Israel; Not forced compliance, that won out in the end. And with an already tasked local police force in training, there will no longer be a need for militants and well... The rest is basically cut and paste from my previous posts. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 22, 2008 11:12 PM
When the so called "moderates" are those attempting to poison Israel civilians then most people would say they are not "moderates" at all. Count me as one who questions whether there are any "moderates" among the Palestinians.Certainly those you term "moderates" overwhelmingly elected the terrorist organization Hamas to power. There is no room to doubt that since the percentage vote for Hamas was overwhelming. Now Xodian, you keep repeating your broken records defense of Hamas which is in no way a "moderate" organization..neither the so called military wing or the political wing. The leader of the political wing is in hiding outside of the Palestinian territory. He's wanted for murder in Israel for his terrorist activities. So Xodian, I want you to name...by name and position within Hamas those in Hamas you claim are "moderates" who have renounced terrorism and have agreed to recognize Israel's right to exist. If you can't do that Xodian then you're just blowing smoke out your.... IP: Logged |
Xodian Moderator Posts: 275 From: Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 23, 2008 10:16 PM
In relation to the thread that has been posted before Jwhop, all you need to do is look upon the article I posted on the first page of this thread to get some names on that front and they are willing to negotiate a proper deal on the matter. And sorry again for the late replies. I am swamped! Way too much to do; Way to little time to do it all in. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 23, 2008 11:59 PM
So Xodian, you give me names in stories...one of which is more than 2 years ago and the other from more than 3 years ago and hold these guys up as "moderates"? No where did either of them say Hamas is ready to acknowledge Israel's right to exist. One talks about a ceasefire...based on terms Israel will never agree to and should not. Just another red herring to get foreign aid flowing into Hamas coffers. Sheik Hassan Yussef the top Hamas leader on the West Bank, Sheik Hassan Yussef,declared that the group should consider an indefinite “hudna’’ or pause in armed conflict if Israel were to withdraw to its pre-1967 borders, approve a right of return for Palestinian refugees, release long-term prisoners and raze the wall being built in the West Bank. Khalid Meshal Let's see Xodian. The Hamas leader who lives in Damascus Syria because he's wanted for murder in Israel for being behind terrorist attacks on Israel. This is your "moderate"? This "moderate who says a peace agreement is possible...if...the terms are in the interests of the Palestinians. "In Damascus, exiled Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal spoke of Israel as a reality and said the group would respect existing agreements as long as they are in the interests of the Palestinians". So Xodian, these "moderates" say peace is possible...an indefinite ceasefire provided Israel gives them everything they want....and they don't have to recognize Israel's right to exist. So, at any time of their choosing, they declare the "peace" is over and start their attacks again, after building up their military strength. You must think Israel is populated with fools Xodian. But what do those in the PLO say to their friends and followers....in Arabic when they think no one from the west can understand them Xodian. You know, the party of Abbas. Oh, and by the way, Abbas and his party are not in control there. Hamas is in control there so Israel has no one with whom to negotiate anything at all. What good are worthless agreements the so called leader can't or won't enforce?"But they need asking, again, in light of the recent remarks of Abbas Zaki, the Palestinian Authority's ambassador to Lebanon on Lebanese television. This longtime veteran of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, a pioneer in terrorism along with his late comrade in arms, Yasser Arafat, announced publicly – in Arabic, of course – what all Palestinian Authority leaders say when they let their hair down. He showed, once again, the only difference between the Mahmoud Abbas-led Palestinian Authority, supported financially and militarily by Israeli and American taxpayers, and the Iranian-backed radical Islamists of Hamas in the Gaza Strip is one of tactics and strategy. Hamas makes no secret of its plans to destroy Israel and makes no pretense toward negotiated settlements of the conflict between Arabs and Israelis. The Palestinian Authority makes a pretense. But that pretense is often shattered when you eavesdrop on Palestinian Authority leaders when they speak in Arabic to their own constituents. They always tell the same story: Their effort to negotiate over the creation of a Palestinian state is merely a tactical matter. In no way does it suggest they are "selling out" the PLO commitment to destroy Israel, kill all the Jews and establish a larger Palestinian state encompassing all of the land of Israel. "When Israel's ideology will collapse, and after we take Jerusalem, Israel's ideology will collapse altogether, and then we will proceed with out own ideology, if Allah wills, and we will throw them out of all of Palestine," he said, according to a translation by the Middle East Media Research Institute. Zaki reiterated that "the right of return (for millions of Arabs and their descendants who left Israel in 1948 and 1967) is guaranteed by our will by our weapons and by our faith." "The important thing is that in any operation, Israel will pay a price," he said. "We don't want cases in which you don't kill even a chicken, but Israel kills 20 of you. I salute any operation that makes Israel pay a heavy price." How many times must we hear words like this, read them, watch them being uttered, before we stop pretending there are peace-loving, freedom-loving leaders in the fantasy land of Palestine worth supporting? There is no substantive difference between Abbas' PA, which the U.S. and Israel support as a "peace partner," and the fanatical killers in Hamas who control the Gaza Strip. Perhaps the only real difference is the level of honesty with which they articulate their goals and strategy. This charade with the PLO has been going on for 15 years. When are we going to learn? The PLO has not changed its stripes. Tragically, it never will. It is still committed to the destruction of Israel and the extermination of all Jews. Tragically, it always will be. There is no qualitative or moral difference between the killers of the PA and the killers of Hamas, just as there is no qualitative or moral distinction between Hamas and al-Qaida. http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=62137
IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 24, 2008 03:46 AM
Terrorist Fundraisers for Obama By Patrick Poole Wednesday, April 23, 2008 Two years ago, Hatem El-Hady was the chairman of the Toledo, Ohio-based Islamic charity, Kindhearts, which was closed by the US government in February 2006 for terrorist fundraising and all its assets frozen. Today, El-Hady has redirected his fundraising efforts for his newest cause - Barack Obama for President. El-Hady has his own dedicated page on Barack Obama's official website, chronicling his fundraising on behalf of the Democratic Party presidential candidate (his Obama profile established on February 19, 2008 - two years to the day after Kindhearts was raided by the feds). Not only that, but he has none other than Barack Obama's wife, Michelle Obama, listed as one of his friends (one of her 224 listed friends). But his leadership of Kindhearts is not the only thing that has brought him scrutiny by federal law enforcement officials. Last summer, El-Hady was questioned by the FBI concerning his knowledge of possible conspirators in a UK-based terror plot. Hatem El-Hady's interest in "change" is understandable. Following the closure of Kindhearts, he said in response to the government's closure of his organization: "It's dirty politics," said Dr. Hatem Elhady, chairman of the board of KindHearts, which raised $5.1 million in 2004. "They do not like the way things are going in Palestine. They do not like the election results. But that is not our problem. Our problem is providing aid to people in desperate need of help." The Department of Justice had a very different version of events. According to the DOJ, Kindhearts assumed the role of lead terrorist fundraising in the US after the government had closed other such Islamic "charities": "KindHearts is the progeny of Holy Land Foundation and Global Relief Foundation, which attempted to mask their support for terrorism behind the façade of charitable giving," said Stuart Levey, Treasury Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. Not only was Kindhearts engaged in providing funds for HAMAS in Lebanon and the West Bank, it had hired as a fundraising specialist the man identified as the designated HAMAS bag man in the US, Mohammed El-Mezain. And as investigative reporter Joe Kaufman revealed, "The Black Hearts of Kindhearts", a number of other Kindhearts officials were tied to terrorist fundraising and support: KindHearts’ Director of Domestic Programs, Khalifah Ramadan. Ramadan was a training and evaluation consultant for the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), two large Muslim organizations based in the United States that have links to overseas terror groups. KindHearts’ Representaive, Omar Shahin. Shahin was an Imam for the Islamic Center of Tucson (ICT), the former home of numerous terror operatives, including Wael Jelaidan, who later helped found Al-Qaeda. KindHearts’ Representative, Wagdy Ghuneim. Ghuneim, an Egyptian cleric, has been featured in KindHearts fundraising dinners for 2002, 2003 and 2004. During a rally at Brooklyn College, in May of 1998, Ghuneim attempted to persuade the crowd to support violent jihad and labeled Jews as “descendants of the apes.” KindHearts’ Representative, Hatem Bazian. Bazian is an Islamic Studies instructor and a member of the faculty of Near Eastern Studies at UC Berkley. In April of 2004, during a San Francisco anti-war rally, Bazian, a native Palestinian, called for an “intifada” against the United States. This was just two months prior to Bazian being featured in a KindHearts Fundraising Dinner, entitled ‘Palestinians in agony!’ KindHearts’ Manager in Lebanon, Haytham Maghawri (a.k.a. Haytham Fawri). Maghawri, the past Social Services Director for HLF, according to the Treasury Department, “collected [KindHearts] funds and sent them to Hamas and other Salafi groups.” [One of the recipients of KindHearts funding was Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) Usama Hamdan, a leader of Hamas in Lebanon. And two months before Kindhearts closure by the US government, Beila Rabinowitz had revealed that the South Asia Division Coordinator for Kindhearts, Zulfiqar Ali Shah, had known ties to al-Qaeda, even conducting a 10-day tour with officials for the Tablighi Jamaat organization, which the New York Times had described as "a springboard for militancy" and a "recruitment" center for Al-Qaeda. Barack Obama has promised change. And as indicated by the public support that his candidacy has received by accused terrorist fundraiser Hatem El-Hady, Obama's version of change that terrorists and their US supporters can believe in. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=6203178D-C782-42E2-8D56-765A3D7EDC D7 IP: Logged |
Xodian Moderator Posts: 275 From: Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 24, 2008 08:11 PM
Jwhop, you have yet to prove to me sincerely that the Palestinian people want an all out recombinant deal to the pre-1968 border. Its not the case; For the most part, the majority wants a more vibale border that is FAIRLY divided. The '68 border is just a start; A template to which people can work on backwards. Obviously there will be negotiations on it IF there is an atmosphere created for negotiations and frankly, you seem to lean on some pre-defined notion that all Israelis aren't gonna talk. Offcourse they want to talk; They are want an end to this predicament as much as any other person in the region (minus the extemists.)Yes I know that Abbas isn't in power but he has enough influence in the region to charge a better outlook upon which Hamas may have to follow if they do not want to incite a civil war and if your memory should serve you correctly Jwhop, that is one of the MAIN reasons why the Fatah party lost to Hamas in the elections (apart from Araft's legacy of corruption and scandle.) No Jwhop, Israel isn't filled with fools; They are smart enough to understand that prolonged conflict in the region isn't gonna benifit anyone and in no way will it serve to place a long term sercirity within the region. And that is more then I can say from someone who has yet to post something else then frontpagemag.com and the likes. IP: Logged | |