Lindaland
  Global Unity
  Find Lowest Gas Prices in Your City: Link (Page 26)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 184 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Find Lowest Gas Prices in Your City: Link
Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 26, 2014 10:19 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Holding.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 27, 2014 02:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
$3.37!

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 28, 2014 02:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Not sure why the sudden increase.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 01, 2014 02:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Unchanged.

IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 927
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted March 01, 2014 03:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
MAYBE YOU GUYS SHOULD FOCUS ON SOMETHING MORE IMPORTANT LIKE PREVENTING GLOBAL WARMING INSTEAD.

It ****** me off every time I see this thread.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 01, 2014 11:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Perhaps, you never got the memo: No global warming in 17 years.

IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 927
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted March 02, 2014 05:31 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
Perhaps, you never got the memo: No global warming in 17 years.

You are so misinformed.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 02, 2014 09:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, that comes straight from the premier source of information, the IPCC. There has been no warming in almost two decades.

IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 927
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted March 02, 2014 11:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
Well, that comes straight from the premier source of information, the IPCC. There has been no warming in almost two decades.

I think you need to recheck your sources. IPCC released a report in September of last year stating that there is upwards of a 95% probability that humans are the main contributing factor behind global warming.

IPCC quote: "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average sea level".
http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/en/mains1.html

IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 927
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted March 02, 2014 11:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Further,

"Eleven of the last twelve years (1995-2006) rank among the twelve warmest years in the instrumental record of global surface temperature (since 1850). The 100-year linear trend (1906-2005) of 0.74 [0.56 to 0.92]°C is larger than the corresponding trend of 0.6 [0.4 to 0.8]°C (1901-2000) given in the TAR (Figure 1.1). The linear warming trend over the 50 years from 1956 to 2005 (0.13 [0.10 to 0.16]°C per decade) is nearly twice that for the 100 years from 1906 to 2005. {WGI 3.2, SPM}"

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 02, 2014 12:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes, and that's why they have an agenda. How can we have the warmest years on record and yet no warming has occurred--BOTH at the same time? You seriously have not heard that there's been no warming in the past 17.5 years? Where have you been hiding? They are blaming it on the oceans. And we are supposed to be warming, because we are leaving a little ice age. Man contributes a miniscule amount of overall CO2. The rest is naturally occurring. So how can man be 95 percent responsible for anything? Because the IPCC tells you so? Just like all of their other models and predictions have failed. They also failed to predict this halting of warming with their models. They are nothing but voodoo science witch doctors. Follow the money.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 02, 2014 01:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yeah, and if all that warming is caused by CO2, it wasn't due to man, since man contributes about 2 percent of it--no matter how badly the IPCC money-groveling grant funding parasites want to make you think it is. So, where is all of that CO2 actually coming from?

quote:
Originally posted by Sibyl:
Further,

"Eleven of the last twelve years (1995-2006) rank among the twelve warmest years in the instrumental record of global surface temperature (since 1850). The 100-year linear trend (1906-2005) of 0.74 [0.56 to 0.92]°C is larger than the corresponding trend of 0.6 [0.4 to 0.8]°C (1901-2000) given in the TAR (Figure 1.1). The linear warming trend over the 50 years from 1956 to 2005 (0.13 [0.10 to 0.16]°C per decade) is nearly twice that for the 100 years from 1906 to 2005. {WGI 3.2, SPM}"


IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 927
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted March 02, 2014 01:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
To quote your own words,

"the premier source of information, the IPCC"

You can't just misquote them and then when it turns out you were wrong claim that what they are saying is bull because they disagree with you.

I'd like to see some evidence that they are witch doctors and voodoo priests please.

Or is that just your own opinion? Based on... what... exactly?

IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 927
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted March 02, 2014 01:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"But consider what happens when more CO2 is released from outside of the natural carbon cycle – by burning fossil fuels. Although our output of 29 gigatons of CO2 is tiny compared to the 750 gigatons moving through the carbon cycle each year, it adds up because the land and ocean cannot absorb all of the extra CO2. About 40% of this additional CO2 is absorbed. The rest remains in the atmosphere, and as a consequence, atmospheric CO2 is at its highest level in 15 to 20 million years (Tripati 2009). (A natural change of 100ppm normally takes 5,000 to 20,000 years. The recent increase of 100ppm has taken just 120 years).

Human CO2 emissions upset the natural balance of the carbon cycle. Man-made CO2 in the atmosphere has increased by a third since the pre-industrial era, creating an artificial forcing of global temperatures which is warming the planet. While fossil-fuel derived CO2 is a very small component of the global carbon cycle, the extra CO2 is cumulative because the natural carbon exchange cannot absorb all the additional CO2"

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 02, 2014 01:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Then why no warming for almost two decades? That's according to the IPCC. Explain, please. Why are you spouting off the alarmist rhetoric, yet there has been no warming. Where is the warming? Why have the models failed to predict the pause? Why have the temps not gone up in accordance to the rise in manmade CO2? I call BS!

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 02, 2014 01:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Don't take me literally. I was being sarcastic. I consider the IPCC to be fakes, frauds, and charlatans. I refer to them only in that you believe in them, so if they say no warming for 17 years, then I'm wondering why you don't listen to them in that reference. They have a sinister agenda, and it doesn't involve saving the Earth. It's all about power, control, redistribution of wealth, and lining their lying greedy little pockets.

IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 927
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted March 02, 2014 01:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Did you not read a word I wrote?

I just quoted IPCC as saying;

"Eleven of the last twelve years (1995-2006) rank among the twelve warmest years in the instrumental record of global surface temperature (since 1850)"

OBVIOUSLY THEY ARE SAYING THERE HAS BEEN GLOBAL WARMING IN THE PAST 17 YEARS. This is from their website.

It is evident your sources have misrepresented the IPCCs conclusions.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 02, 2014 01:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
No, that's what I am trying to tell you. They are contradicting themselves. Even AG knows we are in a warming pause. But you mkae a good point. How can we have the warmest days in history (supposedly) and not have had any warming in two decades. Ah, the paradox of Liberal math!

IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 927
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted March 02, 2014 02:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
CO2 accumulates in an unnatural way due to human activity. This, over time, creates global warming. Unless we stop our consumption, there can't be a "pause". And we haven't stopped our consumption. Just look at the Kyoto targets! I think we can all agree they have failed big time.

The temperatures are just an indication that something is going on. It is the evidence that we are measuring since the onset of the industrial revolution (you can find the spikes of CO2 in the atmosphere from that time in samples from the ice caps).

Until people stop driving fossil fuel cars and burning down the rainforest (which recycles carbon), I don't understand what you mean by the past 17 years what you mean when you say we are on a "time out" from global warming? What do you think creates this pause?

IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 927
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted March 02, 2014 02:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Anyway maybe we should just move this to the other thread. http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum26/HTML/002473.html

and
http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum26/HTML/002465.html

and...
http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum26/HTML/002472.html

Or just pick one, I don't know

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 02, 2014 06:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The IPCC says the pause was due to the warming going into the oceans.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 03, 2014 03:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Personally, I find that to be a cop-out. But either way, if the process continues, there is no need for alarmism as it relates to global temps, at least.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 04, 2014 10:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yeah, there are dozens of these threads.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 195981
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 05, 2014 03:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
$3.37

IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 927
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted March 05, 2014 06:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Killing the planet.

IP: Logged


This topic is 184 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2024

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a