Author
|
Topic: Love Children
|
Aphrodite Knowflake Posts: 3531 From: Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted June 07, 2004 11:16 AM
Hi Aselzion,The Cancer Man and Scorpio Woman chapter in Love Signs has a brief mentioning of "love children" by Linda, whereby she says children produced by people with a 5-9 vibration are more special (I don't have the book on hand right now to write the specific words). Would you mind adding more color to what Linda meant, if you know? Thank you much. A. IP: Logged |
pixelpixie Knowflake Posts: 2753 From: Ontario, Canada Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted June 07, 2004 12:18 PM
More synchronicity abounds. I read that chapter the other day. Thought the same thing.. so, I second the question! Thanks for 'firsting' it. ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/biggrin.gif) IP: Logged |
Aphrodite Knowflake Posts: 3531 From: Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted June 07, 2004 12:54 PM
Neato! Yeah, Linda has this thing about sprinkling mysteries in a very subtle way. Have you read Gooberz, Pixelpixie? ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/bounce.gif)
IP: Logged |
pixelpixie Knowflake Posts: 2753 From: Ontario, Canada Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted June 07, 2004 02:49 PM
You know what? I haven't. But all these topics here make me really want to. Years ago, I ordered Venus Trines at Midnight, as I really wanted to see the continuation of Linda's words through poetry, and I always loved the way she wrote. I should do the same with Gooberz. Until I came here, I hadn't realized she'd actually published it. I'd only ever seen speculation and 'promises' in her previous books. I most definately will, when it calls to me more insistently. Don't want t o satiate every need, or else I'll have to go find more........ whet the appetite, so to speak.IP: Logged |
Aselzion Moderator Posts: 933 From: Peabody, MA USA Registered: Nov 2002
|
posted June 08, 2004 02:15 PM
Greetings...Hey Mighty!! I wish I could shed more light on that topic for you, but I'd actually have to re-read Love Signs to figure it out. I'll have a look at it and see if it rings any bells for me... Thanks for the picture.. you are very photogenic! And I kinda like that the jacket looked green.. that's one of my favorite colors! ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/smile.gif) In the Light, and more later... ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/heart2.gif) A ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/angel.gif) ------------------ "The ALL is MIND; the Universe is Mental." *** The Kybalion IP: Logged |
Aselzion Moderator Posts: 933 From: Peabody, MA USA Registered: Nov 2002
|
posted June 09, 2004 05:31 PM
Greetings...Ok mighty A... I think that Linda was talking about when the act of Love was meant as a channel for the creation of Life... the blended auras would be light and bright, attracting a soul of "better" quality, say, than a soul that was attracted by the muddied tones of lust. This, she called a "love child". To be frank, I'm sure that there is a wee bit of something to this theory of hers... but... I also believe that Souls incarnate to whom and at the Time that they are supposed to... and if that means accessing s physical body through the virtue of a "lust" relationship.. that would not really sully the "quality of the Soul. I believe that the Soul is never truly sullied, unless BY CHOICE! God/Goddess don't make any mistakes, nor do they punish their children. That we do to ourselves! So, it's an interesting theory that Linda has... and as I say there may be more than a hint of truth contained therein. Personally... I don't know. Children and Love relationships don't seem to be the bulk of my work on this plane in this incarnation... so I cannot speak with any certainty on the matter. I suppose my next question would be.. what do YOU think? Blessings... A ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/angel.gif) ------------------ "The ALL is MIND; the Universe is Mental." *** The Kybalion IP: Logged |
silverbells Knowflake Posts: 1163 From: maryland Registered: Apr 2003
|
posted June 09, 2004 09:52 PM
I was thinking about this very thing the other day too. I was thinking abou this movie that I like called "Bless the Child" and the little girl who was sent from God who's mother was prostituting to feed her drug habit. I was wondering about stuff like that. I don't remember that part in Love Signs (if I ever read it before) I'm going to take a look at it.------------------ Get some love in your groove, just get hip to forgive - Michael Franks IP: Logged |
Aphrodite Knowflake Posts: 3531 From: Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted June 14, 2004 10:33 AM
Hi Aselzion,Thank you for your input. There are several different ways I see Linda's words. One way is a reinforcement of conservative politics. This bothers me the most. Actually, it upsets me. I've had a long week. Will write more later. Love, A. IP: Logged |
Aphrodite Knowflake Posts: 3531 From: Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted June 21, 2004 02:49 PM
Hi Aselzion,On the one hand, I can see Linda's theory parallel to the prevailing institution of marriage, children, and birth control. The rhetoric is idealistic and sends a message that there are "good" and "bad" quality babies. Any other way of producing babies is "bad." She did make a point in Star Signs that one lexigram of LUST is SL*T. One cannot help producing underlying ideas of differences in this presentation, and the domino effect of problems when a person believes the status quo as the truth. Sometimes I think theories like this subliminally perpetuate dark and nasty consequences, and encourage fear. Fear of mistake, being less than something else, and/or being powerless. Why can't we just embrace the ALL? Venus in Pisces , A. IP: Logged |
pixelpixie Knowflake Posts: 2753 From: Ontario, Canada Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted June 21, 2004 03:40 PM
![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/love.gif) I very much agree with your statement. I remember reading about this in starsigns, and while it made sense in the context of the book, and lexi's, I felt somewhat ashamed, even though justified in the things that I was doing, in the greater context of my life.. I figured no one can agree wholeheartedly with everything someone else believes or preaches to be true, even though the vast majority of the things she wrote about awakened a lot of inner knowing within me. I thought it was a grand sweeping judgement, which was very unlike her on the whole. (As we have established, judgements do nothing for me, except raise my hairs and get my back up.... ) Just wanted to say.... Yep. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 17795 From: Columbus, GA USA Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted June 21, 2004 06:36 PM
I disagree. I think Linda was just trying to differentiate between animalistic sex and a higher Spiritual Love. It's obvious that babies have a much greater chance of leading successful, well-adjusted, emotionally-balanced Lives if raised by committed parents who are in Love as opposed to being the unwanted result of a casual roll in the hay--often leading to a single parent situation and/or an environment filled with much conflict, anger, and immaturity. So, Souls with a great purpose of some global importance might choose that kind of a Loving environment to be born into, in order to help further their goals. That being said, of course, all babies are miracles. ------------------ "Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark IP: Logged |
Aphrodite Knowflake Posts: 3531 From: Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted June 21, 2004 07:24 PM
Hi Randall,I respectfully disagree with you on that sentiment. A.
IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 17795 From: Columbus, GA USA Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted June 21, 2004 07:35 PM
![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/heart.gif) ------------------ "Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 17795 From: Columbus, GA USA Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted June 29, 2004 01:32 PM
I don't think Linda meant the Soul would be sullied. That's not what she was saying. Just that there are different levels of Soul evolvement. ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/angel.gif) ------------------ "Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark IP: Logged |
Aselzion Moderator Posts: 933 From: Peabody, MA USA Registered: Nov 2002
|
posted June 29, 2004 04:42 PM
Greetings...I have been loathe to jump into this conversations for many days as I feel that I have no great words of wisdom to help clarify these concepts. In a sense I see both viewpoints. Aphrodite is right in her assertion that it does seem to qualify some Souls or babies as being of higher/lower quality. And this I feel to be untrue in the larger scheme. We are all equal in the Spiritual sense with NO Soul being any greater or lesser than any other. How could we be? In my belief system, we are all ONE SOUL. However, when that Soul chooses to Incarnate into a plane where all things are NOT Equal, the MANIFESTATIONS may appear to be that some souls are more evolved while others appear to be less evolved. And that is what it is.. an appearance. Remember, even Hitler went to Heaven. ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/smile.gif) I am sure and certain that great Souls have manifested through relationships that are less than balanced and harmonious... and have adapted to overcome whatever seeming obstacles may have been encountered in their natal environments, if you will. I am also equally certain that many Souls who have Incarnated to loving and harmonious parents have Chosen paths that may be less than what we perceive as "evolved". What it boils down to is that the Choice or Path that the individual follows when it Incarnates into this dimension is simply that... a Choice. Yes we can provide optimal circumstances... but it will be what it Will Be. I hope this makes some sense or helps a bit... Again, I have more questions than answers at this point... In the Light... A ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/angel.gif) P.S. We must also remember, that like ALL of us, Linda was a product of her times. Despite her enlightenment in some areas, like all of us... she had SOME of the information. I don't believe that any one person Incarnating in this Reality can (or Should?) have ALL the info. She did the best she could with what she had.. but it did flow through her personal FILTERS. We all have certain beliefs or concepts that may have been ingrained since childhood, some from our parents and others developed through our own experiences... and not all of them are full of Light and Love. Often we aren't even aware of them until they rear their heads and we take a long hard look at them... but they can and often DO color our perceptions. Know what I mean? ------------------ "The ALL is MIND; the Universe is Mental." *** The Kybalion
IP: Logged |
Aphrodite Knowflake Posts: 3531 From: Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted June 30, 2004 10:07 AM
Aselzion,Right on. Your words rang my inner bell. Particularly the word, "appearance." Oh the spiraling trips on that word . . . ! Thank you very much for your response, even when you did not want to respond. That says something. ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/heart2.gif) Aphrodite IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 17795 From: Columbus, GA USA Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted June 30, 2004 02:04 PM
I agree, A-man. I never meant to imply that any Soul is good or bad or better than any other--simply that some incarnate for a specific higher purpose (I don't think anyone would deny that) and that the fulfillment of that purpose might somehow be linked to parents and environment. I think Linda had it right on, but my undrstanding of what Linda said apparently differs from others' perception of her statements. ![](http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/looking.gif) ------------------ "Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 17795 From: Columbus, GA USA Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted July 01, 2004 01:37 PM
I agree about the filtering also. Though I agree with Linda 99.99 percent of the time, I think she was mislead about some of the environmental issues of her day (which was more science than junk science at that time). ------------------ "Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark IP: Logged |