posted February 14, 2007 02:37 PM         

mine is 11. Justice. I like things fair. Thats really accurate.

------------------
Virgo Rising 8'57, Sagittarius Sun/4thH 3'26, Pisces Moon/6thH 8'22

"Our passions are not too strong, they are too weak. We are far too easily pleased." - C.S. Lewis

posted February 14, 2007 07:35 PM         

quote:

---

How to Find Your Life Path number.

First, we reduce each unit (month/day/year) of the birth date to a single-digit or a Master number.
Next we add each of the resulting digits (or Master numbers) together and reduce the total again to a single-digit.
Example:
October 12, 1936.
October is the 10th month. Reduce 10 to a single-digit. 1 + 0 = 1
The day of birth is 12. We reduce 12 to 3 (1 + 2 = 3)
The year of birth is 1936. We reduce 1936 to 1 + 9 + 3 + 6 = 19. 1 + 9 = 10. 1 + 0 = 1. The year 1936 reduces to 1. .

---

my birth month is 6
my birth day is 11,
my birth year is 1985, 1+9+8+5=23
23 is not a single digit so we have to add again
so now we add 2+3=5

so now my
birth month is still 6
my birth day is stil 11
but now my birth year is now 5

and 6+11+5=22 a master number

posted February 14, 2007 08:00 PM         

adds up to 31

if you read the beginning of the thread this is how I was taught.....

different methods?

You do it your way.....I do it mine.....

This is a system which I Iearned years and years ago!!

Isnt the fool 0 in the tarot?

posted February 14, 2007 08:12 PM         

Yes reduce down to one digit

And I have never seen the Fool as 22....interesting though....I shall look out for that...

posted February 14, 2007 09:57 PM         

my crabs is 07-05-1964 would like to compare if anyone has the time thanks!

posted February 14, 2007 11:13 PM         

I think there are many people here that would have had more than one personal card

celticfyre your number is 17/8 so your card would be The star and Strength

posted February 15, 2007 03:38 AM         

4 = Emperpor......4th card in the Major Arcana....

posted February 15, 2007 02:00 PM         

oh and *cough cough* sorry I was so spastic yesterday...I normally can keep that undercontrol lol

quote:

---

Why do you keep putting the alien sign up?

---

posted February 15, 2007 02:21 PM         

Just learning....

Like all of us...

Yeah the alien think normally denotes "weird" doesnt it?

posted February 16, 2007 03:33 PM         

11 March 1987

1+1+3+1+9+8+7=30=3

posted February 16, 2007 04:20 PM         

2 excellent books relating tarot to astrology,
numerology, chakras, crystals....the list goes on.

posted February 16, 2007 04:38 PM         

I've been thinking about both ways to calculate and how in the end you get the same out come but just before that things stray.... which got me wondering... why does that happen?

take (I'm going to call it the Decoz method cause I don't know what else to call it)
the formula is like this (birthday, 6-11-1985)
6
11
1985. 1+9+8+5=23. 2+5=5
6+11+5=22
-------
Now the line method
6+1+1+1+9+8+5=31. 3+1=4
-----------------------

then it gets a bit interesting. you can get the same 31 total with the decoz method but only if you don't reduce the numbers all the way...
6
11
1985. 1+9+8+5=23
6+11+25=31

when I looked at this, I thought to my self if you can get the same total by just not reducing all the way,
calculating by line is basicaly adding without ever fully reducing...

another thing that cought my eye was in adding by line there is no distinction between the month,day and year. the numbers are just disassembled into their single digits. Where as in the decoz method the month, day and year all have their kept identities. and the end sum is a collaboration of the three parts.
but in the line method the numbers could be in any order and you would still get the same sum. the is no unique collaboration of three purposeful numbers of the day, month and year...just the disassembled remnants of what they were.
the year of 1985 was the year of the "5" not the year of 23

my theory of the three parts needing to stay independant and separate untill the end when the all be come one is supported by a similar way of adding the numbers
6
11
1985
6+11+1985=2002. 2002=22

the number still came out to 22
because it didn't matter how they were added as long as they were kept separate...
if the numbers do not keep their separate identities untill the end they will not in turn become the whole three sided number they were ment to be.
the line method in its destruction of the numbers as separate identities seems to make the numbers flat and one sided...

It really does matter how the numbers are put together. Just like in cooking. If you were going to make a souffle if you just plopt all the ingredients eggs,cheese ect into the baking dish stired them together... its not going to come out a souffle.... were as if you keep the ingredients separate, the egg foam, salt, cheese ect until the end you will get a souffle
instead of big blob of stuff that a souffle is made up of...

what is your take on this