posted November 05, 2004 05:16 AM            

I dont use the rule with them, but I was just curious if anyone had heard any other say from lindas other books about the rule.

Peace

posted November 05, 2004 12:35 PM              

Welcome!!

From my understanding, 11, 22, 33 are not broken down. 44 carries the same vibration as 26/8, 55 = 10/1.

Linda Goodman says in Star Signs that Compound Key numbers stop at 52.

"All Compound numbers reached through your calculations that are higher than 52 must be added to reach a new Single and/or Compound number"

posted November 05, 2004 12:39 PM              

Here's a quote from Star Signs explaining it:

posted November 05, 2004 05:12 PM            

I have to disagree. I also wondered why 33 and 44 weren't considered Master numbers by Linda. They just weren't. 44 = 26 and can be broken to 8. 33 is broken to 6 in the example on page 158 regarding Elizabeth Taylor. She also mentioned on page 163 that 33 is a minor number - in context talking about Elizabeth on its own as minor compared to Key Numbers.

She only mentioned 11 and 22 as masters. I believe Pythagorus saw the beauty of mirrored numbers and called all such numbers master 11 - 99, but in Chaldea they weren't. I could be wrong, but I never saw 33 or 44 mentioned as Masters.

posted November 05, 2004 06:27 PM            

i was just curious because i am writing a book on numerology and I had come upon the 33 in one instance as being a major contribitor to the world as much as the name of the person, and I just wondered....would this rule apply, but if it did she would have said so.

I miss lindas presense, wish someone would find a lost book that she hid up in cripple creek of something. LOL.

anybody else seen any good books on mumerology out there, i am in salt lake city utah, for such a "holy" place you should see some of the books at the library here! especially on numerology, though the library has showed its power to the church (mormons) on what it means to have free speech etc with books. i dont think i would have found some of the books i see here in the chicago library and its bigger.

hope to talk to you guys more.

Cheers.

posted November 07, 2004 05:52 PM            

I don't trust other systems. I've given some a go, and they just seem to be lacking. Likewise with other programs. They can sometimes be a bit too generic. I used to calulate by hand peoples numbers, and the human factor (even with my virgo moon) would come in and I made mistakes. Hence, I wrote a java program to help speed up, and ensure less errors, with Chaldean calculations - using Linda's interpretations. The link's below. The thing is, when I made mistakes, I knew they were wrong. If the numbers don't add up to the person, then they're wrong. It never failed. Sometimes it could be close - like my mum in law was born on the 20th right? Well, she claimed to be cusp gem/taurus. I was sure also had Aquarian. Well, I determined from Relationship signs that she was the 21st, which is similar, but still very different - 20 = awakening which she did not go through. She told me, maybe she did, but when I found out she's 21, it just clicked. Linda's interpretations help with this. I've never read anything which wasn't correct - it could be vague, but there were always specifics. Best of luck with your book!

Hi Noreenz, how are things? The tape is great hey? I still haven't heard Gooberz yet, but I will soon - on my next big drive. Thanks again!

Heaps of Love,
Dean.

------------------
I think, therefore I thank...

posted November 07, 2004 06:25 PM            

Thanks for the link and info, its always interesting to read more from others. so much knowledge so little time....