posted January 15, 2009 10:11 PM            

Have you ever had anyone be a jerk after you gave a reading?
Do you tell people what to expect before they get their reading?

posted January 15, 2009 10:33 PM            

I may not answer all of your questions because I'm very 12th House, that's where my Sun is and I keep many things private but I can tell you that most of my clients have been over the phone and internet the last year and a half because I'm not in a place where I can comfortably host clients and I prefer to have them come to my place for a consultation.

I've never had anyone be a jerk after a consultation but I have had people show up drunk or high for the consult and depending on the subject matter I may choose not to proceed. I have altered my information to include telling clients not to drink or do recreational drugs before a consultation. It can be psychologically damaging to people when they aren't clear about what your telling them and there is so much sensitive and personal information that comes out of a consultation. And it's also very disrespectful to me and to themselves. Why pay so much and not get your money's worth.

I do tell people what to expect from a reading especially because they think they are going to hear me saying, "Venus in the 9th House square the ASC and asteroid 'Bubba' opposition..."

When I do a consultation, you would think it's a psychic reading because I don't mention the symbols at all, even if it's another astrologer who is consulting with me because it's a waste of time. People come to me for the insight and information that is being expressed by the chart, not for an astrology lesson and if an astrology lesson is what they want, I'll consider it but I'm not an astrology teacher. It doesn't float my boat.

I think you would be a wonderful at it, you have a lot of knowledge and clarity and your come across as very organized, that's most of the battle right there.

posted January 16, 2009 12:31 PM            

LOL!!!
That's funny - actually I kind of do the same thing when I read tarot, and don't tell people the cards I am reading because it feels too distracting.

I love your posts, Geo, I think you're so awesomely talented at what you do! We're all very lucky to have you on LL

posted January 16, 2009 12:55 PM            

Thank you for the compliments, it feels really good. And I'm glad you understand what I mean about doing consultations without naming the cards. It's so true that when I have my cards read, I have no idea what the cards are and if I didn't ask to learn the symbols, why should I be forced to learn them. I don't have an interest in learning the cards, but should that deprive me of getting the insight from someone who does know how to read them?

posted January 17, 2009 08:17 AM            

For following the millions of tiny clues I left all over the Linda-Goodman website over the past year and a half that I've been posting to find my exact birthdate and time. To be fair, it's been less than a year and four months. She now knows my secrets.

posted January 17, 2009 11:52 AM            

I have another clue to work out tho, so methinks the award may be somewhat premature, but I'm much gratified nonetheless

Apparently my detective methods work very well -- thank you for confirming my hunches, Watson

posted January 17, 2009 12:27 PM            

But really I can't say that because you have done an amazing job. You did it the right way and without a picture, which shouldn't be necessary. Did you see the slippery Golden Flying Eagle even though Astro.com doesn't trace it out?

posted January 17, 2009 01:23 PM            

quote:

---

I'm sure you did. Hey, I want an Oscar, too, but I have to wait to do something kinda cool first.

---

Howzabout this for starters

posted January 27, 2009 11:19 AM            

They were born within 5 minutes. No one mentioned if they were born yesterday or the day before yesterday. Right now I'm assuming it was yesterday. 1/26/09 Here is the birth data. (Source: MSNBC.com 1/27/09):
The eight children, in the order of their appearance, born at Kaiser Permanente Bellflower Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA.

— Baby A - a boy, weighing 2 pounds, 11 ounces, born at 10:43 a.m.
— Baby B - a girl, weighing 2 pounds, 12 ounces, born at 10:44 a.m.
— Baby C - a boy, weighing 3 pounds, 4 ounces, born at 10:45 a.m.
— Baby D - a girl, weighing 2 pounds, 8 ounces, born at 10:45 a.m.
— Baby E - a boy, weighing 1 pound, 8 ounces, born at 10:46 a.m.
— Baby F - a boy, weighing 2 pounds, 12 ounces, born at 10:47 a.m.
— Baby G - a boy, weighing 1 pound, 15 ounces, born 10:47 a.m.
— Baby H - a boy, weighing 2 pounds, 11 ounces, born at 10:48 a.m.

It's amazing that they have the exact times. I'll be back with some charts.

Geocosmic Valentine
Professional Astrologer
geocosmicvalentine@yahoo.com
. www.myspace.com/geocosmicvalentine

posted January 27, 2009 02:47 PM            

Baby B
1/26/09
10:44 AM
Los Angeles, CA

Baby C
1/26/09
10:45 AM
Los Angeles, CA

posted January 27, 2009 02:57 PM            

Baby E

Baby F

posted January 27, 2009 03:00 PM            

Baby H

posted January 30, 2009 05:44 PM            

With this set of Octuplets, not only is it rare to give birth to them all alive, but to have them all within a 5 minute span of time is probably highly unusual. In this case they all appear to have their ASC's between 28 degrees Aries to 29 degrees Aries. It is my personal belief and assumption that the last one or two probably really are 0 degrees Taurus Rising. Unless those doctors had an atomic clock in that delivery room, I think I'll assume the last one is 0 degrees Taurus.

My reason? We don't know what portion of the minute that baby was born in. I made a personal chart of the last child on my own software and set it for 10:48:55 AM. That gave it a definite 0 degrees Taurus ASC.

IF I'm wrong about that, there is one last God given option after looking at things like Sabian Symbols, name asteroids, etc.; God chose to make them all Aquarians. Aquarius is the sign of THE INDIVIDUAL!!!

These charts all show a conjunction of Jupiter-Sun-Moon-Node in Aquarius. Jupiter is expanding those Aquarian energies, the Moon is suggesting that their NEEDS will be highly Aquarian, desiring freedom and individuation at all costs, because it will be denied to them very early on in their lives.

Just take a look at Saturn opposite Uranus in their charts. That Saturn is challenging Uranus, tightening it's abilities.

The reigning need of that Aquarius Moon is Fueled by the Aquarian Sun, that's energy to innovate. They will all need to be innovative in order to create a completely different persona from all of their other brothers and sisters.

Aquarius is THE humanitarian sign and they were all born as a mass of humans born into a household that is already a mass of humanity. It was just announced today that the mother ALREADY HAS 6 CHILDREN!!!!

So the situation becomes even more strange. The mother is already living with her parents with her other 6 children and her husband, yet it has also recently been reported that she had these embryos emplanted...

Why is she having more children through the use of science if she's living with her parents and her other six children?

Aquarius explains the strangeness of the situation - and the possible insanity of the situation as well.

With Uranus in the 12th House of things unseen, I believe there is more to this story and these parents and this family than they really want the world to know.

posted January 30, 2009 08:04 PM            

But in addition, I just read that 2 years ago, the family (I guess that means grandmother and grandfather also) filed for bankruptcy and abandoned the home they were living in. WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE???

On another forum I frequent, I mentioned that with Moon in Aquarius (NOT ALWAYS) you can have a mother who is HIGHLY ECCENTRIC or even insane for some reason. I guess this fits the bill.

It's also coming out that the mother was implanted with 8 embryos and usually the minimum a woman will be implanted with is 4.

posted January 30, 2009 08:39 PM            

I think it's too many babies simply for the fact that many other stories are popping out today about her filing bankruptcy 2 years ago and who is going to help her pay for these 14 children.