Lindaland
  Astrology 2.0
  He's Just Not that Into You (Page 10)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 12 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   He's Just Not that Into You
gabriella
Knowflake

Posts:
From:
Registered:

posted April 25, 2009 09:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for gabriella     Edit/Delete Message
(this is amowls)

Don't want to restart a heated thread (though since it's been like 5 days I think I've simmered down a little lol) but to answer Raymond's question about Chiron square Venus:

In my Chiron book, the author had an interesting take on it saying that those with this aspect may have had many many past lives of the opposite sex and are having to cope with being the other in this one. Chiron is also highly aspected in my chart in general and makes aspects to my ASC, Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Saturn, and Uranus.

I should also say that since I have Libra Moon, I guess inequality just really grinds my gears in general.

23 also mentioned that we both have a lot of masculine energy in our charts so it's hard for us to really accept when society tries to "feminize" us.

IP: Logged

Lucia23
Knowflake

Posts: 669
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 25, 2009 11:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lucia23     Edit/Delete Message
23, now that LL is back up, I should mention that I am not divorced. I describe my situation in the first post on this thread. By mentioning divorced women, I meant to note that it is quite common for people who have been in very long-term, committed relationships for many years who suddenly become single again as adults to experience confusion about reconnecting.

I am also very lucky because I had an exciting, positive, validating experience as a single teen--lots of smart, funny, sexy, unique, exciting, kind guys to choose between, all of them interested right back!

IP: Logged

23
Knowflake

Posts: 250
From: The Strand
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2009 08:37 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for 23     Edit/Delete Message
Thanks Lucia - got the message. Yes I could imagine your situation would be very disorientating after a stable and long relationship! I guess as teens, we are still boys and girls and somewhere things change. I really don't know what to say. I just wish you the best of luck in finding a happy place in your life.

IP: Logged

23
Knowflake

Posts: 250
From: The Strand
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2009 08:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for 23     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
23 also mentioned that we both have a lot of masculine energy in our charts so it's hard for us to really accept when society tries to "feminize" us.

Yes, I still kind of have issues with feminisation. I've gotten better at it. It's especially hard considering that my Moon is in Libra, my Venus is in Sag and unaspected! So I've never really relied on my fem planets but have recently been getting in touch with my Moon.

IP: Logged

Lucia23
Knowflake

Posts: 669
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2009 11:37 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lucia23     Edit/Delete Message
Thank, 23!

IP: Logged

Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 696
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2009 12:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message

Barbara Hand's Chiron book is a bit esoteric for me.

I also see that she's a New Age teacher too.

I like Melanie Reinhart's Chiron book. It's more psychological,practical,and down to earth.


Raymond


IP: Logged

gabriella
Knowflake

Posts:
From:
Registered:

posted April 26, 2009 12:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for gabriella     Edit/Delete Message
Thanks Raymond, I'll check it out.

IP: Logged

Belage
Knowflake

Posts: 81
From: California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2009 01:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Belage     Edit/Delete Message
To Lara:

I am afraid historians would have to disagree with you on Cleopatra.

She wasn't just batting her eyes when she "seduced" her men. She actively went after them.

To seduce Cesar: She smuggled herself into his presence in a rolled up carpet which was unrolled dramatically. Then she proceeded to charm the toga off him and they became lovers that first night.

To seduce Marc Anthony who had been sent by Rome to straighten her out: she sailed up to meet him dressed in sexy dresses and surrounded by singing and dancing nymphettes, and for a couple of weeks, she wined, dined and entertained him AT HER EXPENSES with extravagant and dazzling spectacles. He too fell under her spell.

I don't know why it's so hard to understand that some women are good at going after the men they want. Cleopatra's conquests were no wusses. Cesar and his successor Marc Anthony were the most powerful men/warriors of Rome. So the idea that men who fall for aggressive women must be somewhat confused or effeminate or not quite manly is misguided.

IP: Logged

Writesomething
Knowflake

Posts: 939
From: meet me in montauk
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2009 03:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Writesomething     Edit/Delete Message
LOL..I love this post belage..how interesting. sounds like an aries!

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 811
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2009 03:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
personally i have always thought the stronger the man's sense of self the more he will admire a "forward" woman. but the game of push-me-pull-you is half the fun, no?? and it takes all sorts really...

IP: Logged

Lara
Knowflake

Posts: 1056
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2009 03:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lara     Edit/Delete Message
Yeah l know Belage although what you are describing is, to me anyway, SEDUCTION !

She didn't play the role of a man... so was ALL woman in her pursuit!
Agree?

IP: Logged

Benedict Moon
Knowflake

Posts:
From:
Registered:

posted April 26, 2009 03:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Benedict Moon     Edit/Delete Message
I'd have to agree with Belage in that Cleopatra was very masculine in her approach to men, and very successful at it too.

IP: Logged

Lucia23
Knowflake

Posts: 669
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2009 04:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lucia23     Edit/Delete Message
In my own life, I know women who are "masculine" in their seductive approach, and women who are what is conventionally considered "feminine."

Back in those days I'm so nostalgic about when men were attracted to me, I was very "feminine"--I chased a man until he caught me. I would do it mostly by vibing him, body movements, voice. I think this was my 8th house and Moon-Pluto influence. I didn't ask guys out or ever tell them I liked them. Lots of guys were drawn to and excited by this--I heard a lot that I was mysterious.

I have a friend who, in contrast, is very attractive to men and she has ALWAYS marched up and asked the guy out very aggressively right away, including making the first physical move, and having sex whenever she felt like it (usually right after she met a guy she was hot for.) Lots of guys were very drawn to and excited by this, and thrilled by her aggressive approach.

There are different styles of seduction, and what is thrilling for one person might leave another cold. It's also very much about the individual person and his/her unique qualities, so it goes beyond "masculine" or "feminine."

IP: Logged

23
Knowflake

Posts: 250
From: The Strand
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 26, 2009 06:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 23     Edit/Delete Message
Well according to Lucia's theory, I'm feminine when it comes to seductive things.

IP: Logged

cristiname
Knowflake

Posts: 13
From: Earth. Welcome!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 04:51 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for cristiname     Edit/Delete Message
I can't help thinking that maybe Cleopatra also had luck at her side.

I'm sure a smart woman can figure out what a man wants and offer him exactly that and win him over. but since both these men ended up in a long term rel with her - I'm thinking she also lucky. To seduce is one thing - but time can break any spell.

IP: Logged

23
Knowflake

Posts: 250
From: The Strand
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 05:06 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for 23     Edit/Delete Message
I was thinking about what Belage wrote about Cleopatra and I think that her "seduction" techniques is really a Martian thing as she is the initiator. Venus lures but Mars attacks and initiates. Likewise, I initiated contact with Mr 23 when we started, my Mars conj his Venus in Gemini.

She really is initiating and she probably has Mars in Taurus or something sensual.

IP: Logged

iQ
Knowflake

Posts: 286
From: Chennai, India
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 06:02 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for iQ     Edit/Delete Message
The more a mentally powerful and very high inner self-worth male, the more he will prefer a forward woman. He will prefer to be chased by the forward thinking and independent woman because psychologically he thinks he can easily win her if he chases. He wants to surpass the most difficult challenge possible.

Not so successful and not so great looking men do use this subtle surpassor trick to seduce women way out of their league. A seductive woman will become very insecure if she is deliberately ignored.
"He must be someone too great to ignore me" runs in the subconsious.
In fact a multi-million dollar business exists that teaches such covert manipulation to seduce unwitting womem. It is called "Double your Dating" or something.


Deep down, very deep down in the genetic recesses of every woman, there is a throbbing desire for the Alpha Male.

The next level to the Alpha Male is the one who will chase and get the woman he desires, without manipulation. Call him Beta Male.
He may like to be chased too, will definitely be chased by many women and will definitely settle for second best after sometime should his first choice not fall for him.

Number three level would manipulate and chase. Vast majority of men cutting across Astrological signs would be here. Many here would make great husbands once they get their woman, but many would not be comfortable being chased. The mindset is "If she is chasing me, there must be some weakness/drawbacks in her, even if she looks hot.". A lot of this category would have fun with the chasers and ultimately marry the shy girl.

D and E Graders will choose weaker women who they can push around and verbally abuse at will. Pity the women who chase them and then suffer later on. Astrology will help in this case. Afflicted horoscopes can make women fall for D-Graders. Pisces Moon women are primary victims who fall for E-Grade loser men.

F Graders are probably the psychopaths and wife beaters. Only karmic debts and negative karmic overreactions explain any relationship in this grade.

"Law of Attraction" works very well in relationships. Love yourself very deeply and unconditionally at all levels, you will end up attracting a winner.


------------------
http://tamsoft.co.in/articles.html

IP: Logged

Coffee
Knowflake

Posts: 621
From: Leeds
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 06:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Coffee     Edit/Delete Message
We dont always agree with the astrology, but that was a great post iQ!

IP: Logged

23
Knowflake

Posts: 250
From: The Strand
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 06:43 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for 23     Edit/Delete Message
Yes, a good post IQ. I suppose like attracts like. Jocks with Jockettes etc.

However, are you sure that psychopaths only attract the vulnerable? Well they are easier to pray upon but a psychopath can fool the majority of people. You have to be really in tune to see their game I think. Helps to have Pluto on the DC I think

IP: Logged

Belage
Knowflake

Posts: 81
From: California
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 12:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Belage     Edit/Delete Message
That was a great post IQ hunk.

From an astrological standpoint, I would think a very alpha and confident male would probably have moon in a fiery sign, or in Scorpio, or the moon would be aspected with natal Mars or Pluto which would explain their EMOTIONAL drive to the top and their warring nature, but would also indicate the type of women they would be attracted to. Very rarely would these men be drawn to a self-effacing, shy, retiring, passive woman, because this is not the kind of moon they have.

IP: Logged

Lucia23
Knowflake

Posts: 669
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 01:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lucia23     Edit/Delete Message
I think an Alpha Male would like whatever woman he had the best chemistry with, and would enjoy her approach whether she was shy and feminine or bold and daring. He would have the security to follow his true feelings rather than deferring to what others thought/felt.

quote:
Number three level would manipulate and chase. Vast majority of men cutting across Astrological signs would be here. Many here would make great husbands once they get their woman, but many would not be comfortable being chased. The mindset is "If she is chasing me, there must be some weakness/drawbacks in her, even if she looks hot.". A lot of this category would have fun with the chasers and ultimately marry the shy girl.

See, I think women (shy or bold) who avoid these third-tier guys and get with a really secure Alpha Male are dodging a bullet.

IP: Logged

Deux*Antares
Knowflake

Posts: 200
From: No Permanent Address
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 02:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Deux*Antares     Edit/Delete Message
"Law of Attraction" works very well in relationships. Love yourself very deeply and unconditionally at all levels, you will end up attracting a winner. < VERY TRUE.

And may I just add that no one wants to be responsible for another person's happiness and "completeness". You have to make peace with being all by yourself first before you will attract your match. A paradox. True.

IP: Logged

cpn_edgar_winner
Knowflake

Posts: 604
From: Toledo, OH
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 02:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpn_edgar_winner     Edit/Delete Message
i say if he is really interested he will show it and you will know it. i wouldn't want a man who didn't or couldn't go for what he wants. or someone who couldn't handle me when i am going for what i want.

a timid man would never catch my interest.

i say, let him chase you till you catch him.

and i agree with lara 100 percent on not sleeping with him right away as it pretty much nixes any chance of lasting love. i think we all pretty much want someone who really wants us, not just our body. and screw them if they just have thier eye on the paycheck. although i think financial security is also a consideration. along with grooming habbits, you know the stuff that can drive you nuts after you are in love.
financially responsible
relatively clean
snoring habbits
style of underwear (prefer boxer breifs)
good to his mother (BIGGIE)
flatten toothpaste or roll from bottom, or are separate bathrooms a MUST? (i prefer separate bathrooms)(AND do not touch my towel, thank you)

you know the little stuff that a venus in virgo looks at.


does he mind when you burn the dinner? or does he say, this is GREAT? stuff like that is how you know. when you look like crap and he says, you are so sexy, or beautiful or something that makes you feel like you are dressed to the nines, when he says that when you are in sweats with a dirt smudge on your face, you kNOW.

i wouldn't waste my time ever again on a guy who didn't make me feel like queen of his world. and i gladly make him my manly king. sexist or not. thats how i feel.

but keep your GOOD eye on the other stuff and never loan a guy money. well, i don't mean never, but keep your good eye on them. if he is into you you will know it.

also : thumbs up IQ.

IP: Logged

Deux*Antares
Knowflake

Posts: 200
From: No Permanent Address
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 02:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Deux*Antares     Edit/Delete Message
I do not want to start a debate about when to have sex. Just want to share something that I read a long time ago, can't remember the title of the book.

The book was about astrology and relationships and how things between the two persons should progress. Of course it described stuff from Aries to Pisces but what struck me most was the part that said sex should come after commitment according to the zodiac. Scorpio comes after Libra, therefore sex should follow a commitment for partnership or coupledom. Or something like that.

IP: Logged

cpn_edgar_winner
Knowflake

Posts: 604
From: Toledo, OH
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 27, 2009 02:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpn_edgar_winner     Edit/Delete Message
well, i think you have a valid point. i am getting married in june and we were in love with each other prior to sex. we actually had already said the words. more his choice than mine after awhile, i wanted to seduce him in the worst way and he kept saying lets do this right, lets wait. FOR WHAT, i want you NOW..you tease..... i guess that was his trick to get me in love. it worked. i suppose it was supposed to be my trick but patience isn't my strongest thing.

if a guy really wants you he will eat a mile of your crap to get to your butt.

IP: Logged


This topic is 12 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2008

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a