Author
|
Topic: IQ s soulmates calculator
|
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 20, 2009 02:58 PM
BTW I t hink it`s amazing how many soulmate-pairings you have, and all within 2-3 degree. Wow.  IP: Logged |
Kismet* Knowflake Posts: 300 From: Venus Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 20, 2009 03:05 PM
I got a score of 136 for the first soulmate calculator! I used the rules in that one though.  IP: Logged |
Lara Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Dec 2011
|
posted May 20, 2009 03:22 PM
I know!! It is all soulmate pairings lol I only counted the Eros/psyche cos as a DW it would be as potent as 3 degrees but happy to take it off!He is scared I think, my little gun man. I think it freaks him out how I affect him. Our Osiris/Isis aspect is exact... can't remember if it's on the list though! IP: Logged |
vesta Knowflake Posts: 3161 From: Stars Registered: May 2009
|
posted May 20, 2009 03:28 PM
All those pairings fell good don't they! I know that well!!! IP: Logged |
Lara Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Dec 2011
|
posted May 20, 2009 03:37 PM
They do! I only did them from male to female, that's right no?IP: Logged |
Kismet* Knowflake Posts: 300 From: Venus Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 20, 2009 03:39 PM
What asteroids should be used in draconic/natal comparison? Anybody have some ideas? So far, (using major points and planets). We have: My Draco Sun conjunct His Natal IC 1 My Draco Moon conjunct his Natal MC 2 My Draco Neptune conjunct his Natal MC 2 His Draco Moon conjunct my Natal DSC 2 His Draco Saturn conjunct my Natal ASC His Draco ASC conjunct my Natal Mars 0(Ruler of my 7th house) IP: Logged |
Lara Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Dec 2011
|
posted May 20, 2009 03:45 PM
Kismet, use the new calculator on page 3 or 4 of here  It's much more accurate! IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 20, 2009 04:11 PM
Lara,sorry to hear he`s afraid. But I hope nothing you cannot handle. Personally I would also use female to male. But I don`t know what IQ thinks of that.
I disagree on the Eros/Psyche. I think it may be felt in normal synastry, but at that wide degree, it`s not in the centre. And let me quote what IQ once said to Diandra: " am sorry to say that some of your posted aspects are incorrect for synastry. You have used Orbs in excess of 3.5 degrees for conjunctions and oppositions. That wont help for accurate synastry. And many squares and trines have 4 degree orbs. These are also unacceptable because millions of men will have the same aspects! The unique true karmic love will have 1 degree orb aspects with you." And on another thread he explained: "Using maths, if you check for Conj, Trine, Sq, Opp, Sextile and Quincunx for 20 celestial objects with 20 other objects and use a 2 degree orb, you will always find some connection or the other. Such connections will mislead. Thus, first refine the connections by using 10 main objects and a one degree orb. If you get 3 or more links in this case ONLY THEN PROCEED for checking other links."
I know that he has posted that a long time ago, but I`m still completely convinced of its validity.
IP: Logged |
Lara Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Dec 2011
|
posted May 20, 2009 04:25 PM
ok, thanks DD. personally i've never had a DW eros/psyche with the same aspect in any synastry so not sure that it is so common?I will look at female to male too when all my kids are in bed and if my connection will allow it. Impossible to do on my mobile  IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 20, 2009 04:40 PM
Well, I think DW`s are not that common; but of course the bigger the orb, the more common they become. Yet, I think they may be valid with 5 degree orb, just it is different to a dw with 1 degree for example.Actually, iw ould like to give bonus points for DW and for under 1 degree aspects and also for conjunctions. Just picture this: With guy A you have a DW conjunction of Eros - ASC with 1 degree orb. With guy B you have a DW trine of Eros- ASC with 5 degree orb. I think there would be definitely a difference in intensity; yet this difference is not expressed in this calculator.
IP: Logged |
Kismet* Knowflake Posts: 300 From: Venus Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 20, 2009 04:46 PM
I got a 36 on that one Lara...I didn't notice it a first. Thanks for telling me!!IP: Logged |
Lara Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Dec 2011
|
posted May 20, 2009 04:48 PM
I see what u are saying DD. I only thought cos it was eros/psyche and they are a pair as such.Anyway, it doesn't matter. I'll take it off and say 34 + whatever stands for female/male aspects.  IP: Logged |
geemeeni Knowflake Posts: 77 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted May 21, 2009 01:33 AM
Hi DD, You asked me back on page 4 how my score was with the new calculator... not very good! I got a total of 5 points, and if I increased the orb to 4 I got an additional 7 points. I'm not sure how I could've calculated as high as 285 for the first system and then so low for the second. (maybe I should recalculate both to make sure!) Keep in mind, for the second method I only did the comparison one way, from his to my chart.IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 21, 2009 04:53 AM
Geemeeni,well, I think this new calculator has to be "refined" yet. I also tried it out with several people. My parents, married for 35 years, have a score of about 20 I think. Two friends of mine, who are definitely soulmates and both being aware of it, with noone running away in any direction, have a score of also about 20 pts. Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward have a score of 18. On the other hand I had a score of 36 with Johnny Depp, which is much too high.
IP: Logged |
iQ Moderator Posts: 4915 From: Lyra Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 21, 2009 04:54 AM
Hi All, DD, Vesta etc have made many good observations. The new system is not yet fully ready so scores of 17 or 20 odd will finally end up nearer to 40-45. Even the category range will change. Most of the previous system high scores were due to sextiles and higher orb values. I am upgrading some conjunctions to 2 points so that trines get 1 point. Also, some trines have to be given 1 point but some trines will have 2 points. The scoring framework will lay more emphasis on Generic Love Asteroids. I skipped Siva-Kaali as their releavnce is more on past life Tantrik contacts which are out of scope for a young couple seeking to establish a relationship. Aspects like AMOR conjunct ISIS or VALENTINE trine Jupiter are very important to iQ the Astrologer in analyzing a couple but get only 0 points as far as the calculator is concerned. Due to convenience, it is better to use the same pattern for Male to Female or Female to Male. However, if you girls like a guy, why should it matter what aspects your planets make to him? It is what aspects his planets make to you which will make him attracted to you. And after you establish the relationship, the composite will only come into play. The Draconic Calculator and explanation is reserved for my e-book as I dont have time to compile all info on that right now. Again, I need some more time to make this a valid framework as I have to eliminate the coincidental findings and list the aspects with maximum validity. ------------------ http://tamsoft.co.in/articles.html IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 7072 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 21, 2009 05:07 AM
Hi IQ,"Most of the previous system high scores were due to sextiles and higher orb values." Yes, ànd I`m very glad those got eleminated, as I never could get my mind around the idea that sextiles should have the same "attraction-effect" than conjunctions. "I am upgrading some conjunctions to 2 points so that trines get 1 point." That`s something I can DEFINITELY relate to. " Also, some trines have to be given 1 point but some trines will have 2 points." Which trines would have 2 points? Those which have a male and a female planet like Sun-Venus or Eros-Aphrodite or even Eros-Juno?
"The scoring framework will lay more emphasis on Generic Love Asteroids." Hmm, what are generic love asteroids? Amor and Valentine?
"I skipped Siva-Kaali as their releavnce is more on past life Tantrik contacts" Okay, I understand that. But why do those relate to past lives and others not? And couldn`t a Siva-Kaali conjunction be expressed in this life between couples?
"However, if you girls like a guy, why should it matter what aspects your planets make to him? It is what aspects his planets make to you which will make him attracted to you."" Does that mean we could do two calculations; one for the male part, one for the female part and see if both are attracted? And is it always the left side of the system who is attracted (Sun, Mars, Eros)? And for the other categories is that division still meant like this, looking at HIS Sun, Mars, Eros to HER Juno? Oh and what about Venus, Psyche and Aphrodite to Juno or Pluto? "The Draconic Calculator and explanation is reserved for my e-book " Do you already know when your e-book will be published?
IP: Logged |
iQ Moderator Posts: 4915 From: Lyra Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted May 22, 2009 04:52 AM
<< "The Draconic Calculator and explanation is reserved for my e-book " Do you already know when your e-book will be published? >> The moment my babies decide that they should sleep before midnight...
IP: Logged |
DiandraReborn25 unregistered
|
posted October 08, 2009 11:19 AM
for newbieIP: Logged |
eyes_like_pisces Knowflake Posts: 384 From: mpls, mn, usa Registered: Feb 2013
|
posted February 09, 2014 03:33 PM
Okay so I see there's been some discussion on squares. If the reason squares dont get looked at is because they indicate too many challenges, I can understand that. But what confuses me; if that is the case, is why a quincunx (imho is more challenging than a square) gets attention, but the semi-sextile doesn't? Perhaps I missed something. No trying to be argumentative just confused.IP: Logged |
Orange Knowflake Posts: 3242 From: Georgia Registered: May 2009
|
posted November 07, 2015 09:34 PM
quote: Originally posted by iQ: I am almost getting to the Eureka Moment with the new system. The new calculator radically eliminates chances of spurious soulmates. I am thinking of making some of the one pointers as 2 pointers. This will soon help me come with a categorization like this: Provided Ascendant Rule is satisfied: A) 0 to 10 points: Low chances of being a relationship soulmate. If negative aspects like Mars square Mercury are low, the couple can first go into a friendship mode and see how things go from there. B) 11 to 15: 50-50 chances of being relationship Soulmates. There is something special which can blossom. Negative aspects wont be a big detterant if regular communication exists. Sudden flings must be avoided. C) 16 to 24: Bright chances of being relationship soulmates. Negative aspects will also drive the relationship into positive mode. You two may always be on each other's minds. Sexual relations will definitely occur if both are single and are dating. D) 25-34: 90% plus chances of being true love soulmates. Separation from each other will be very painful. The couple must give each other their best. E) 35+ : 99% plus chance of being true love relationship soulmates, possibly Twin Souls. You both will dream of each other, recall past lives together and will be guided by Higher Self for the correct course of action for fulfillment.
Me and my Aries man scored a good 59. I guess we did well with the math here . heh ) IP: Logged |
Aubyanne Moderator Posts: 5852 From: Tinseltown, Hollyweird, The Multiverse Registered: Sep 2014
|
posted November 07, 2015 09:55 PM
I think the Universal Filter needs to be expanded a bit. It seems a little too limiting. IP: Logged |
athenegoddess Knowflake Posts: 5245 From: Registered: Aug 2011
|
posted November 07, 2015 11:38 PM
I like it and think its perfect with the universal filter rule.IP: Logged |
EmGem Knowflake Posts: 889 From: Registered: Jan 2015
|
posted November 08, 2015 12:59 AM
quote: Originally posted by Orange: Me and my Aries man scored a good 59. I guess we did well with the math here . heh )
Cool! Can you drop a link on the calculator? Where is it? IP: Logged |
deepseablues Knowflake Posts: 831 From: the ocean floor Registered: Jan 2014
|
posted November 08, 2015 02:32 AM
http://www.tamsoft.co.in/soulmates.html IP: Logged |
EmGem Knowflake Posts: 889 From: Registered: Jan 2015
|
posted November 08, 2015 03:02 AM
Thank you is this the updated version?IP: Logged |