Author
|
Topic: do you find that Water and Air sign women are the prettiest, while Fire and Earth men are the manliest/most handsome?
|
Scorpionic_Web Knowflake Posts: 55 From: Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted March 25, 2011 12:33 AM
Anyway, this thread is nonsense. Attraction, beauty, is relative. If you care for what popular opinion calls "sexy" then you probably don't deserve your own opinion.I'm most attracted to Taurus and Sagittarius women. It's far more than "looks". It's the total package. My thoughts on women through the Zodiac: Aries: Too pushy; makes me want to sexually manipulate them just so they'll shut up. Taurus: I love them, we're opposites and it feels like perfect poison for a Scorpio. Very under-estimated intelligence, strong body and mind, combined with those god d*mn supple breasts. Gemini: I think "kinky" with Gem girls. They seem like toys to me. Cancer: Where are they? I know very few Cancer women, and I figure I don't need that emotional baggage, regardless. Leo: Very entertaining. I'd be very curious to ever find one in bed with me. But, like Aries, I just want to kick that pedestal out from under them. Virgo: Cute. I like that "dainty" quality, it's very endearing. So naive, I want to be their daddy. Not sexually. That's dirty. Libra: Often very nice to look at, but I find they are the as much "the flavor of the month" as they treat me to be. Scorpio: Let the games begin! Enough! I'm sick of your games! Sagittarius: So much fun! I'm a Leo Asc, which corresponds to my 5th house, which is Sagittarius. Too many fun nights to count! Good conversation, good sex. The perfect short-term affair. A breath of fresh air. Capricorn: Great wisdom. Good sexual chemistry. Lots to learn from these women, even if they are a bit arrogant. Aquarius: Very intriguing. If perhaps only for the sake of being left more confused than I was in the first place. Pisces: A torrid affair. Who was that girl? IP: Logged |
vertiver Knowflake Posts: 2405 From: Portland, OR Registered: May 2009
|
posted March 25, 2011 12:36 AM
quote: Originally posted by Scorpionic_Web:
I find this whole tattoo phenomenon all too ridiculous. And certainly for women. Tattoos on women are repulsive at best. It's an insult to femininity. I've happily lost my attraction to 3/4's of the Richmond female population based on these immature attempts at individualization.
You should get out of VA! Move to a place like Portland, OR where tattoo'ed girls are as easy to come by as the tattoo-less. I have no tats' while all my girlfriends have several, including my mom... IP: Logged |
Betty Boop Knowflake Posts: 3377 From: Betty Boop Land Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 12:38 AM
quote: I didn't realize this thread probably makes a lot of people out there self-conscious.
Well yeah - I was thinking it might, when I read the title.. I don't think you shouldn't have posted it though because there is something to this for sure. I think the distinction you made, boils down to sex lol (trust me to say that!). Air and Water are both detached from their animality in a sense... Water wants to escape the physical through spirituality and Air escapes it through their intellect. Earth and Fire elements are more physically raw - more willing to get down and dirty. I can see why this seems like a masculine trait - since "good little girls" shouldn't be this way... lol They should be less like the earth signs, the fire signs and Scorpio..... and they should be more like Cancer, Pisces and the Air signs. But - I don't actually like the separation there - between the physical (body) and the spiritual/intellectual (mind and soul).. I don't like that some people cannot and are not willing to get in touch with their animal side (and that society encourages this behaviour in women) -- and on the other hand, that other people cannot get in touch with their more emotional, spiritual side (and that society encourages this in men). There needn't be a distinction between the epitome of femininity --- sweet, pretty, beautiful, asexual -- and the epitome of masculinity - "the big bad wolf who sexually corrupts little red ridding hood". Because lets face it in RL there are many female wolf-ettes corrupting red riding hood men.. LOL And thankfully these days it is more acceptable for them to do so and to be as sexual as they like. IP: Logged |
Betty Boop Knowflake Posts: 3377 From: Betty Boop Land Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 12:40 AM
Scorpionic - quote: Taurus: I love them, we're opposites and it feels like perfect poison for a Scorpio. Very under-estimated intelligence, strong body and mind, combined with those god d*mn supple breasts.
Do you remember what you said about them some years back? I can refresh your memory if you like... IP: Logged |
Scorpionic_Web Knowflake Posts: 55 From: Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted March 25, 2011 12:44 AM
Betty Boop, please, refresh my memory.My first obsession was a Taurus. My current obsession is a Taurus. I'll stand by anything I've ever said about these women. They are the most fascinating frustrations I have ever had the unfortunate pleasure of knowing. IP: Logged |
Betty Boop Knowflake Posts: 3377 From: Betty Boop Land Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 12:48 AM
Well if you insist...  I even found the thread: http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/009569.html
You said: "SueG- Yes, I am an angry young man. But its not because of Taurus girls. Taurus girls are innocent sex toys to me, and have no role in any bitterness I have towards women." :edit: Wait.. There's more that I forgot about... quote: Money and promiscuity: these are the Taurus women I know.I'm 23 and Taurus girls seem mentally vapid and physically fleeting. They're such intriguing people, but its only because there is NOTHING there.
And LMAO… at the next bit -- quote: I'd consider any Taurus girl on this website to be automatically more advanced than the average.
--- It's interesting how your perspective has changed in time... IP: Logged |
blugrey Knowflake Posts: 1006 From: Nowhere Registered: Nov 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 12:54 AM
-IP: Logged |
amowls** Knowflake Posts: 1948 From: Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:01 AM
I'm sure the tattooed women in Richmond could give two effs about whether you find them attractive or not lol. My boyfriend complains about my septum piercing (arguably the tramp stamp of RVA) and I don't care. If he breaks up with me, there are plenty of other guys that dig septums. The only reason I don't have full sleaves is because I want to get them done at Ghost Print and she's always booked.It's kind of unsettling (or at least I feel unsettled) that you find such exceptionalism with women getting tattoos. Perhaps not all women are ultra feminine, and they don't have to be. Do you take issue with women wearing pants, too? We're (slowly) moving toward a genderless society, and I welcome it. BTW HI!!!! And Vetiver, Richmonds like a mini Portland (the show Portlandia strikes a chord with many Richmonders). I think he's better off in NOVA with all the suits. Nary a tattoo in sight. IP: Logged |
vertiver Knowflake Posts: 2405 From: Portland, OR Registered: May 2009
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:05 AM
quote: Originally posted by amowls**: Do you take issue with women wearing pants, too? We're (slowly) moving toward a genderless society, and I welcome it. BTW HI!!!!
Haha good one! Perhaps strong independant women threaten him? Anyways being ultra feminine can be done up with enough make up and spary on tan... Nothing is natural anymore... IP: Logged |
Scorpionic_Web Knowflake Posts: 55 From: Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:07 AM
Betty Boop, it's true. And like I said in that thread from 5 years ago, "sometimes I think it's my age group". At the time I was involved on and off with two taurus women. They both only wanted sex, and it was the only thing I considered them being worth.I'm still convinced that the two taurus women whom I mentioned in my 2006 post are vacuous sex depots. But luckily, I concede, I have met some amazing Taurus women in the years since. IP: Logged |
amowls** Knowflake Posts: 1948 From: Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:08 AM
I meant wearing pants literally lol, since one puts on pants just like one gets tattooed.IP: Logged |
Scorpionic_Web Knowflake Posts: 55 From: Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:14 AM
Betty Boop, I still stand behind everything I said then, because it was the standard with which I had to work. Those two girls are still today as degenerate as I had described, but luckily I saw them for what they are and have since found better Taurean women with which to conduct my surveys.IP: Logged |
Scorpionic_Web Knowflake Posts: 55 From: Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:20 AM
Amowls:I'm speaking as a matter of preference. Obviously society as a whole loves your septum ring. Keep up the trend. IP: Logged |
Benedict Moon* Knowflake Posts: 2791 From: Avendesora Registered: May 2009
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:23 AM
quote: It's kind of unsettling (or at least I feel unsettled) that you find such exceptionalism with women getting tattoos. Perhaps not all women are ultra feminine, and they don't have to be. Do you take issue with women wearing pants, too?
This made me ROFL. On the subject, I always have this suppressed urge to stuff a sock in the people who say girls should not get tattoos. I don't get the big deal about it as long as they're reasonable. And we all know that people OF BOTH SEXES can get some pretty ridiculous tattoos.
IP: Logged |
Scorpionic_Web Knowflake Posts: 55 From: Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:32 AM
I prefaced my comment about women and tattoos by saying that I find the WHOLE phenomenon of tattoos to be ridiculous. That is to say, men or women. I find tattoos immature, regardless of gender. It's a matter of personal sexual attraction. I feel like taking an otherwise beautiful woman, who is covering herself with cheesey and low-class imagery, is like proverbially punching god in the face. IP: Logged |
Scorpionic_Web Knowflake Posts: 55 From: Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:35 AM
Why is everyone here so p*ssed off?IP: Logged |
Scorpionic_Web Knowflake Posts: 55 From: Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:44 AM
Amowls and Betty, what is your inclination for getting personal here? I thought we were just sharing ideas. Amowls, maybe you're right about me not fitting in Richmond. Maybe I belong back in Philadelphia, a city and culture where I've grown up to find that by large, trashy appearances aren't so glorified. IP: Logged |
Benedict Moon* Knowflake Posts: 2791 From: Avendesora Registered: May 2009
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:45 AM
TBH, (and I'm only speaking of myself here) your original comment kind of reminded me of previous conversations I've had on the subject with males and females. So I didn't mean to single you out, I was really talking in general. I have tattoos, yes, so I do think its narrow as hell when people say those type of things. That is all. *shrugs*IP: Logged |
blugrey Knowflake Posts: 1006 From: Nowhere Registered: Nov 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:51 AM
-IP: Logged |
Benedict Moon* Knowflake Posts: 2791 From: Avendesora Registered: May 2009
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:53 AM
Some of the most proper-uppetty people that I know have tattoos. I agree that its just not good way to generalize anymore. IP: Logged |
Scorpionic_Web Knowflake Posts: 55 From: Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted March 25, 2011 01:55 AM
blugrey, wasn't this whole thread about attractiveness generalizations? I made a short list of my own attraction generalizations, too. Why single me out for wanting to contribute my own blanket statement, when this entire thread is a blanket statement?And at what point did I pass my opinions off as "truth". I speak entirely from my own perspective. IP: Logged |
amowls** Knowflake Posts: 1948 From: Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 02:01 AM
I'm not ****** . My replies were light hearted. It's just kind of eye roll inducing when guys wax poetic on "the ruination of true feminine beauty." IP: Logged |
blugrey Knowflake Posts: 1006 From: Nowhere Registered: Nov 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 02:05 AM
-IP: Logged |
VenusDiSirius Knowflake Posts: 6614 From: Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 02:18 AM
 IP: Logged |
amowls** Knowflake Posts: 1948 From: Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted March 25, 2011 02:46 AM
I think you meant clearer skin, or skin free of marks but that's not necessarily true across all cultures (especially in ones where scarrification is the norm).A lot of what we percieve as beautiful is social. And it's hard to do scientific studies on people who all were born and raised in society so they come out somewhat flawed. IP: Logged |