posted May 22, 2012 10:29 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:
Not trying to interject debate and controversy. No interest in debating the three wise men or anything else.

Merely stating who I am and what I believe. It's not my place to question.

I know I would be kicking the hornet's nest, but a question was asked, and I answered the question.

It's cool to hang out here, but it doesn't mean I subscribe to everything that is said in here, or anything at all.

But like I said, there are certain things in life that I hold sacred. Belief is one of them, and it's non-negotiable. Marriage is another. There are others as well.

---

posted May 22, 2012 10:31 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Faith:
Reading Rosalind's original comments, I get the impression she is talking about tendencies and vulnerabilities within the marriage.

But people can live a long time even with weak organs; a marriage can last forever even with flaws.

Now the psychic vision is a whole other matter, and I agree with ariesdragon that if we are going to take that
into consideration, it'd be nice to know more details.

But still, since no one really knows Rosalind well enough to test her psychic ability, let's just take everything with a grain of salt.

'Not trying to criticize you, Rosalind, just saying, we
cannot know how reliable you are without knowing you better.

---

posted May 22, 2012 10:42 AM            

I married an American Southerner with Anglo-Franco-Spaniard roots who is also a Southern Baptist.

If that isn't unconventional, then I don't know what is.

Isn't that another explanation for Uranus in 7th House?

Sorry I just saw amowls posted this.

quote:

---

Uranus in house 7 is considered a "divorce aspect" but most modern astrologers would say that it can also mean an unconventional marriage or being drawn to unconventional people. It doesn't always spell divorce. 50% of all marriages end in divorce anyway, and not all of those people have Uranus in the 7th. Not only that, but you'd have to look at the couple's composite to REALLY see about longevity.

---

posted May 22, 2012 03:02 PM            

quote:

---

. My "Zuckerberg" moment hasn't arrived yet

---

posted May 22, 2012 03:16 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Capriquarius:
[QUOTE] . My "Zuckerberg" moment hasn't arrived yet

---

It's awesome how he doesn't flaunt his wealth and blab about it to impress complete strangers, ain't it.[/QUOTE]

I didn't say I will become a billionaire. I have found career success beyond the hope of most people, and I am in that 1% as well. As far as I remember, I'm the one here with the lasting long term relationship, and many who talk about being relationship experts have nothing to show for it.

It's funny how people who choose to be caustic don't have much of their own to talk about, isn't it?

It's also funny how a mere illustration evokes such emotions, especially given how his IPO has flopped on his face and his post-IPO performance is down 17.7% as of May 22nd close of market, as opposed to the usual IPO achievement of up 15% to 20%. His market value is flopping faster than his business concept, or lack thereof.

Empty vessels make the most noise.

Until such time you have something of substance to add or a noteworthy level of achievement we can all celebrate, kindly direct your caustic remarks elsewhere.

I remind you once again, you are legally liable in any civil jurisdiction across the US for your remarks on the internet, and if you are a minor, your parents are legally liable, with no limitation on said liability.

posted May 22, 2012 05:44 PM            

quote:

---

It's funny how people who choose to be caustic don't have much of their own to talk about, isn't it?

---

posted May 22, 2012 10:43 PM            

It can also mean a non-traditional type of marriage... That could be anything..
I was also married to someone with a different nationality...

As long as it remains non traditional, things would should be ok... Its not like anyones nationality will change

posted May 23, 2012 08:43 AM            

I'm saddenned to hear what happenned in your instance. However, it's impossible not to get personal when discussing personal matters. I would be much obliged if you could share further, if you care to. Otherwise, just please ignore me.

My analysis of the situation based upon what information I have is either: (1) he walked out on you for someone else, (2) you walked out on him for someone else, (3) there was a temporary fling by one party, perhaps he engaging a "professional," or (4) there was a sudden devastating financial or social crisis.

I have had my share of crap hitting the ceiling fan throughout my marriage. I lost two daughters, I lost my job seven times, I declared bankruptcy to save my son's life, we lost our home to medical bills and I came back strong, she gave her kidney to my son, I'm supposed to give my kidney and a liver lobe, etc. etc. None of this crap mattered because we emerged even stronger. Look at this nation right now: all divided. Harken back to when this nation was under adversity: after 9/11, after Pearl Harbor, etc. We are strong under adversity.

Anyway, in my case, it's not just about some social union called marriage. Its about saving my son's life. The boy wasn't supposed to survive birth. He's now 16. I intend for him to live longer than myself.

posted May 23, 2012 08:55 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:

Perhaps Rosaland is reticent to discuss her vision because she thinks one of us will die. But the thing is that we are different. Death isn't just an end but also a new beginning. Death takes on a whole new dimension for us Christians. Death is the only thing I can think of that will break this marriage, and even then the marriage would not be terminated.

---

You are wrong. Death is out of the question. And please, stop assuming things I didnt say. There are other reasons why I refuse to talk about the vision. Since refuse to believe what I said you may simply forget and move on. If you think your marriage is gonna resist endlessly its OK. But again, please, stop assuming thigs I didnt say.

posted May 23, 2012 11:01 AM            

There is a concept called professional ettiquette, regardless of what industry we operate in. When making jaw dropping, eye opening assertions, professionals are morally obligated to provide corroborative evidence. It's up to the recipient to sift through and conclude. This is particularly true if what is said is injurious, regardless of how pure, helpful and good intentioned the professional is. What I have seen thus far is hypotheses with no analysis.

I approached my line of questioning with no preconceived notions. I have never questioned your credibility. I didn't even request anything further: that came from others. We all just want some corroborative analyses.

posted May 23, 2012 11:11 AM            

I will share what happen, but I need a lil time.. I'm at work right.now.. I think I'll start another thread on it..
Since it was sooooo unexpected...