posted January 29, 2014 11:32 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by I'm so cappy:
-_-

Some of you take it too seriously.

---

Preach!

quote:

---

Originally posted by next to neptune:
Why do you want the ruler of virgo to change then? I think it's provocative, that's all. I don't see any reason why you would do that besides the fact that you don't think mercury fit, because you think gemini is the only sign who can be ruled by mercury. Why does it have to be virgo who gets a new ruler? Why not gemini then?

---

I don't... and I never said I did. I said TAURUS doesn't quite fit with Venus IMO. And I didn't invent the idea that Taurus could be ruled by Earth. It's an idea that was out there way before.

Anyway, rulerships have changed from the traditional astrology. So it's not a new concept either.

posted January 29, 2014 12:19 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by I'm so cappy:
-_-

Some of you take it too seriously.

---

posted January 30, 2014 02:31 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by I'm so cappy:
-_-

Some of you take it too seriously.

---

Yeah I'm so damn serious. I was also thinking about changing the ruler of capricorn. What about some meaningless moon to jupiter or any asteroid floating around in the orbit of jupiters ring? I think that fit's capricorn a lot.

Of course you say I'm too serious, cause you're not even involved.
But I guess you don't care cause you're a capricorn.