posted July 28, 2015 01:11 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aquacheeka:
Why are you stupid? Alphabetically or by category? Here, let me just grab my scroll.

Let's start with "calls anyone who references modern astrology in explaining why this does not resonate with them dumb" and just go on down the list.

You can't just post something, say all modern western astrology lacks credibility and only "ancient" astrology is credible, not cite any sources, and then snap at anyone whose experiences do not conform to your little theory or who asks where you read or saw this. It just makes you look stupid. But your hypocrisy in calling someone dumb and then whining when you're called dumb already accomplished that so you may as well just delete the whole thread since it was basically a 0/10 fail.

---

So I'm stupid for calling someone "dumb"? I'm stupid for clarifying? Okay...

I clearly stated that the concept of magnetic attraction had nothing to do with triplicates, modalities, etc. I explained that this concept's logic came from another point of view than the popular modern way of looking at signs that "get along". (Which @reachingforthestars confirmed for me that is was from Vedic concept of vasya signs).

Despite, people started applying the "modern astrology" logic.

I never said that modern astrology is wrong. It has its truth. But it had obviously nothing to do with the "magnetic attraction" concept.

Yet people still made some ridiculous assumptions about it using their "modern astrology" logic. And if that's not overwhelmingly ignorant then I don't know what it is.

Can you make a reference to where I said anything like "modern astrology lacks credibility and that only ancient astrology works"?

"Not cite any sources" Umm I replied to people like 10 times telling them where I got the info. But for your sake, I'll do it again; the interview of astroloada on YouTube, where she speaks about "magnetic attraction". It's not hard to type "astrolada interview magnetic attraction" on YouTube to find the video.

"And then snap at anyone who does not confirm o your little theory"

Please. I kept repeating that they never had to agree with this "theory". They can have their own opinions. And it's not MY theory. That's why I cited them to the source of this info so that they can argue with astrolada rather than me. "I'm just the messenger. So don't shoot the messenger." That's all I was telling them. Is that unreasonable?

posted July 28, 2015 01:23 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aquacheeka:
In any case, I agree with those who said the sign on your fifth house cusp would be another indicator of signs one is "magnetically attracted" to. It's of course individual and dependent on one's natal and cannot be considered uniform for an entire sun sign. That concept is laughable and ridiculous.

---

Bullshīt. My fifth house cusp falls in cancer and I don't ever remember being "magnetically attracted" to a cancer. Or even a Leo, which kinda falls in my fifth house too. So I could say the same about your concept of "magnetic attraction", it's bullshīt.

I'm magnetically attracted to many Sagittarius people, since my ASC is in Pisces.

posted July 28, 2015 06:37 AM            

I am Scorpio stellium with a Taurus ASC and although we're not compatible, I find Taurus men utterly irresistible.

With Taurus men, I have met my match in every aspect AND more. They're a lot more stubborn, strong-willed, and spiteful if he has hard pluto aspects!

posted July 28, 2015 06:52 AM            

I once dated a Taurus and the attraction was not magnetic in any way. It was strong, but not "magnetic".

I am attracted to Geminis but they are major players. They're too superficial for my taste.

Pisces are also in my top 3 although their personality isn't for someone like me. They're too flaky, wishy-washy and have an annoying "martyr" syndrome.

They're womanizers just like Geminis. That's probably because of their "mutable" aspect.

posted July 28, 2015 02:45 PM            

I'd say this is quite true. I've been attracted to quite a bunch of Aries before and they to me. I'd say Aquarians like me too, but I friendzone the ones that do. There's just no spark, I guess.

posted July 28, 2015 03:49 PM            

These Sun signs have a higher chance of getting with me: Virgo, Capricorn, and Scorpio.

These Sun signs are better as friends: Aries, Leo, Libra, and Aquarius.

posted July 28, 2015 05:36 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Soltze:
Geminis attracted to Virgo? Excuse me!
Virgos annoy the f*** out of me. LOL They have qualities but I can't get pass the OCD like behaviour.

I like other Geminis,Cancer,Libras and Scorpios. And that's it. :-D

---