posted January 30, 2010 11:57 AM
>>>I guess you are frustrated with me because my reason for being interested in this man is not what society did to him or how he was treated for who and what he was, but merely the man himself. Um... NO.
>>>I find his studies and philosopies of interest, and although it is sad the way things were for him because of society, I don't think that stopped him from accomlishing what he wanted on his terms.
I'm glad you found his studies
and philosophies interesting, too.
That was a big part of why I posted,
and of what fascinates me about him.
Yes, it is sad, and its nice to hear
you agreeing with that position now.
I agree, he never stopped negotiating
for terms he could live with.
>>>I don't need a reminder of my chart to know that I don't look at things from an emotional level at all times. If I did, I couldn't bear it. You have said it yourself, I am very Cancerian in nature on a whole.
I probably should have left your chart out of it,
despite the fact that few things could be more
relevant; since we see the world, not just as it is,
but, primarily, as we are.
I know you have that Moon/Mars opposition
(I have the sextile myself, along with a
conjunction to the Ascendant, and aspects to
Mercury, Jupiter, and Neptune; in Placidus,
the Moon is located in the first house),
but I dont think that opposition makes you
any more Cancerian than the average person.
What do you have in Cancer, or the 4th?
>>>Bless you for being able to live in a world with your emotions being what they are, I dare not allow myslef to.
"Allow"? LOL! Whatever.
Since I have no choice --
no choice but suicide, --
I have dared to "allow" myself
to live in this world, with my
emotions being what they are,
and me being who I am.
Nice almost communicating with you.
Peace