posted May 27, 2009 10:35 AM         

Remember the old adage acousitc.

"When you find yourself in a hole, guit digging".

posted May 27, 2009 02:33 PM         

Btw, that picture was not posted as an argument. That picture was posted as a preview of things to come and those billboards are going to go up all across America...well, perhaps not in LeftistLand California

Speaking of LeftistLand California acoustic, how the farthermost western Soviet state working out for Californians?

posted May 27, 2009 02:58 PM         

But don't you think it's dishonest to suggest everyone agrees with you...or sees things your way.

My goal acoustic, as I've told you before is to get people to talk, not shut them up. I learn the most interesting things about people's political views by encouraging them to speak up.

Take you for instance acoustic. The more you talk the more of your radical leftist leanings come gushing out.

posted May 27, 2009 03:10 PM         

quote:

---

But don't you think it's dishonest to suggest everyone agrees with you...or sees things your way.

---

Questions should end with a question mark.

I think that if people were interested in following this argument they'd find the more compelling points to be the ones I've made. You never did find where pedophilia has ever fallen under the umbrella of "sexual orientation." You never did establish the reason opposing the myriad of confirmations that Obama is American born. You never proved the Uighurs were actually associated with Al Qaeda. That's a fail, fail, fail. In the meantime, I've provided links to all kinds of information regarding these things. How do you suppose people would line up behind your unsupported positions?

quote:

---

The more you talk the more of your radical leftist leanings come gushing out.

---

There has never been anything radical about what I've said. That's a straight up projection from the local radical.

quote:

---

Keep myself on equal footing with you acoustic? You must be nuts; I would never aim that low.

---

posted May 27, 2009 04:32 PM         

Never tried to shoo anyone away. People are free to agree with your nonsense if they wish. But making disingenuous arguments will draw rebuttals as always.

quote:

---

There has never been anything radical about what I've said...acoustic

---

Nothing radical about calling Bush a murderer acoustic?

Nothing radical about saying the American people repressed/oppressed the Iraqi people acoustic?

Nothing radical about saying the US oppressed/repressed the Iraqi people acoustic?

Nothing radical about calling Bush a liar...Bush lied, people died...without a shred of proof and with 3 US bipartisan commissions and a British inquiry saying just the opposite.

All that's radical Loony Tunes nonsense aligned with the radical Loony Tunes crowds at move on, daily kos and demoscat underground.

posted May 27, 2009 05:00 PM         

quote:

---

No acoustic, you called on people to agree with you. It's pretty weak when you can't stand on your own two feet...and your own arguments.

---

WHAT?!? Since when don't I stand on my own argument? What fantasy land are we living at today, Jwhop?

quote:

---

Nothing radical about calling Bush a murderer acoustic?

Nothing radical about saying the American people repressed/oppressed the Iraqi people acoustic?

Nothing radical about saying the US oppressed/repressed the Iraqi people acoustic?

Nothing radical about calling Bush a liar...Bush lied, people died...without a shred of proof and with 3 US bipartisan commissions and a British inquiry saying just the opposite.

---

Has anyone else ever expressed their opinion of me as being that of a radical on this site in all these years? No

Conversely, what are the opinions we've heard about you from people over the years?

You see what I'm getting at? You can keep posting any list of what you deem to be markers of radicalism all you like. It's not going to change ANYONE'S opinion of who I am, and who I present myself as. To the average, normal person I'm as far from radical as can be. To a person living in an alternate universe of unreality, where untrue is true, I can get why such a rational person might be seen as "radical".

Bringing up the Daily Kos and Democrat Underground is folly. I've never had to visit or quote from either. You, on the other hand, only post stuff you find from Conservative websites. Can't you see the projection? I mean really... Why can't you understand yourself? Is the fog really that dense?

posted May 28, 2009 11:46 AM         

Nothing radical about calling Bush a murderer acoustic?

Nothing radical about saying the American people repressed/oppressed the Iraqi people acoustic?

Nothing radical about saying the US oppressed/repressed the Iraqi people acoustic?

posted May 28, 2009 07:14 PM         

quote:

---

I'm not so weak that I need others to validate my positions or validate anything else about me.

---

You're right. You're so weak that you have to block out other people's opinions, because their opinions might make your opinion altogether invalid, and hold your personality to some standards of accountability. I would love to see you in a scientific setting. Oh the squirming and the temper tantrums as your peers invalidate your crazy notions. That would be a blast!

quote:

---

You are of course lying straight through your teeth with your statement you proved Bush lied about anything at all acoustic.

---

posted May 28, 2009 11:06 PM         

You proved no such thing and weren't even close. Tell you what acoustic, this is your chance to prove I'm wrong.

Now acoustic, state the lie Bush told...as you said long ago and got your a$s kicked...which Bush used to lead America to war.

posted May 29, 2009 07:47 PM         

Show me the definitions of lie.

This will be a walk in the park.

quote:

---

Block out others opinions acoustic? I think you may be ascribing powers to me I don't have.

---

posted May 29, 2009 08:16 PM         

"I did prove it, and it came down to definitions"...acoustic

"Now acoustic, state the lie Bush told...as you said long ago and got your a$s kicked...which Bush used to lead America to war."

Note acoustic, you're no longer on deck. You're at bat now...so prove Bush lied or go suck an exhaust pipe.

posted May 30, 2009 12:19 AM         

quote:

---

Show me the definitions of lie.

---

What? Every time you're asked to confront the truth, you turn away? What's the deal? It was a simple request, and one which loses your argument in two seconds. Why couldn't you do it?

lie  /laɪ/ Show Spelled [lahy] Show IPA noun, verb, lied, ly⋅ing.
–noun
1.a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.

2.something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture: His flashy car was a lie that deceived no one.

3.an inaccurate or false statement.

4.the charge or accusation of lying: He flung the lie back at his accusers.
–verb (used without object)

5.to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with intent to deceive.

6.to express what is false; convey a false impression.
–verb (used with object)

7.to bring about or affect by lying (often used reflexively): to lie oneself out of a difficulty; accustomed to lying his way out of difficulties.
—Idioms

8.give the lie to,
a.to accuse of lying; contradict.
b.to prove or imply the falsity of; belie: His poor work gives the lie to his claims of experience.

9.lie in one's throat/teeth, to lie grossly or maliciously: If she told you exactly the opposite of what she told me, she must be lying in her teeth. Also, lie through one's teeth.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lie

posted May 30, 2009 09:34 AM         

The entire thrust of the definition of lie is that the utterance, speech, writing be a deliberate attempt to deceive the reader or listener and that the person attempting the deception knows what they're communicating isn't true and that in fact, it's false. One cannot lie acoustic...without the intent to lie, without the intent to deceive.

So, when the Director of Central Intelligence slams his hand down on the desk and says..."It's a slam dunk Mr. President, Saddam has WMD" and when every other intelligence agency with whom the US shares intelligence...and many we don't share with...believes Saddam has WMD and when Saddam's own Generals believe Saddam has WMD and have battle plans to use WMD and when Blix The Blind files a UN Security Council Report showing Saddam has not accounted for up to 20,000 tons of chemicals used to make VX nerve agent and one small droplet of VX on the exposed skin is a fatal dose and when British Intelligence tells Bush Saddam has sent a weapons/trade delegation to Africa..Niger to buy uranium yellow cake and when US satellite pictures show conveys of heavy trucks removing materials from a known chemical weapons production plant and when the soil around that plant is removed to a depth of about 3 feet and new soil brought in to deceive UN WMD weapons inspectors and when the entire world knows Saddam has used WMD against his own citizens, the Kurds and against the Iranians and when Saddam has been in material breach of his "cease fire" agreement with the UN for 12 years and in the face of at least 15 additional UN Security Council Resolutions demanding Saddam live up to his "cease fire" agreement, part of which is a total restriction on Saddam to not produce and/or stockpile ANY WMD or WMD components, THEN acoustic, when Bush tells Americans Saddam is in material breach of UN Security Council Resolutions, has WMD and recently sought Uranium from Africa, THEN acoustic, THAT'S NOT AN F-ING LIE

In fact, THE F-ING LIE IS.."BUSH LIED, PEOPLE DIED" AND EVERY DERIVATIVE THEREOF. Those are lies acoustic because the people making those statements know they're F-ING lying through their teeth.

posted May 30, 2009 02:19 PM         

quote:

---

One cannot lie acoustic...without the intent to lie, without the intent to deceive.

---