Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Sarah Palin Scares Leftists

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Sarah Palin Scares Leftists
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 1759
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 26, 2009 10:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
June 26, 2009
Sarah Palin: Revenge of the Vagina (Monologues)
By Stuart Schwartz
Sarah Palin is Eve Ensler's worst nightmare.

That's all you need to know to understand the dramatic impact of the individual who continues to be the target of a cultural and political elite that looks for "anything that will criminalize and/or humiliate Palin and her family." Sarah Palin, of course, is the charismatic, conservative Alaska governor who is unapologetically traditional and Christian in her politics and values. And Eve Ensler is the feminist who wrote the play The Vagina Monologues and has been enshrined by our cultural elite for her bizarre, sometimes depraved, and often just plain silly promotion of a sexual organ as the font of all wisdom.

To understand the Palin hatred, almost always expressed in sexual terms (the David Letterman assessment of her as "slutty" is fairly mild in the Palin-hater scheme of misogynistic insults), you have to understand the profound absurdity of our leftist culture. Ensler's play has been arguably the most visible part of the elite arts scene for more than a decade, performed by adoring feminists at more than 4,000 campuses and college communities in the United States in the past year alone. Her vagina-as-god message has attracted more than twenty awards and a flock of celebrities and politicians anxious to be associated with the playwright who "invented the vagina."

Her original off-Broadway play featured the "good rape" of a 13-year old girl by a lesbian woman who abuses the girl after getting her drunk in order to cure her of the aftereffects of a rape by an adult male some years before. Why is it "good"? Because lesbian abuse of a minor strikes a blow against an established worldview that, according to Ensler and her supporters, must be replaced with...Ensler and her supporters.

The Ensler worldview has become a dominant part of a culture -- most evident on university campuses and in trendy, upscale urban areas -- that promotes spiritual transformation through gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender sex -- not even relationships, just sex. In this, the world's brutality comes from traditional relationships, which lead to the kind of abuse that Ensler has raised more than $50 million to combat. How dominant is this view? The New York Times put its cultural stamp of approval on the world according to Ensler, describing her as "brilliant," a "messiah heralding the second wave of feminism."

Into all of this strides Sarah Palin, who is refreshingly and wonderfully normal, appealing to the vast majority of Americans who don't read The New York Times (303,062,059 at last count) and shake their heads in dismay at the almost endless lineup of celebrities rhapsodizing over the opportunity, like actress Glen Close, to get "2,500 people to stand and chant the word c**t." Or who, unlike the educators bringing culture to their children, don't think that expanding "the identity category of ‘woman'" to "male-to-female trans individuals" will bring peace on earth and goodwill toward...well, all politically sanctioned victims.

Palin is enormously attractive to a majority that has found itself increasingly scorned for middle class values that emphasize morality, tradition and civility (see Bruce Walker's "The Murder of Civil Life" in American Thinker for insight on this). This wide swath of traditional America has found its "proud sense of respectability and family commitment," conservative critic Michael Medved writes, threatened by a cultural avalanche of sex-as-wisdom media and a political class that encourages government dependency by culturally-appointed victims in both public and private life.

Enter the Alaska governor on the national stage. Just when the average American thinks all is lost and Washington is Mordor-on-the-Potomac, Sarah Palin does the unthinkable in a politician: she serves, she works, she makes sense, and she is unapologetically a mother, a wife, and a Christian. She battled corrupt politicians of both parties in Alaska and won, prompting Fred Barnes of The Weekly Standard to describe her, a year before she became the running mate of John McCain, as a politician of "eye-popping integrity." No victim, she: Sarah Palin absorbs the shocks of life the way a ShamWow absorbs water.

Her stewardship of Alaska government has broken the logjam of corruption created by decades of Republican and Democratic politicians, including the incumbent she defeated, and reversed the rating of the governor's office by Alaskans from last to leading all states. Her leadership has enticed Canada and major oil producers to join her in putting together a gas pipeline deal that will do more for U.S. energy self-sufficiency than all the czars and czardines of the Obama administration put together. "By defying naysayers," Investors Business Daily editorialized this month, "Sarah Palin is now vindicated."

Ordinary Americans are responding. Jay Valentine writes in American Thinker that she would "fill a stadium if she were reciting a cookbook." She has been glowingly compared with Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy and -- worst of all, in the eyes of liberals -- Franklin D. Roosevelt (her connection with the average person is a "rare talent" shared by the iconic originator of the New Deal).

And so, too, is the Ensler left. Just as rape is "good" when done for politically correct purposes, so is demonizing an accomplished woman when she threatens the liberal culture that has dominated the past decade. The media establishment has been particularly vicious in its attempt to trivialize her by reducing her to a sexual object. The Associated Press, for example, routinely photographed her as a vice presidential candidate from an angle that emphasized her calves, deliberately playing on images of strippers; Reuters had a more Ensler-like body part in mind when it paired her with a "jacuzzi (sic) floozy"; Yahoo focused on her breasts; Slate, owned by the Washington Post, was reliably Ensler-like when it tagged her as a pornography archetype, the "Sexy Puritan"; and entertainer Sandra Bernhard won applause and laughs from theatergoers and mainstream Washington D.C. media when she warned that Palin would be "gang-raped by my big black brothers" in retaliation for her conservative views.

Palin does not only threaten liberals; she also threatens culturally elite conservatives, who unashamedly savaged a woman who is so...so...well, gauche that she actually admits to praying. Town Hall (by way of the San Francisco Chronical) columnist Debra J. Saunders spoke for a conservative establishment that resented Palin's extraordinary effect on voters when she wrote, "I wish Sarah Palin would just go away." Columnist Kathleen Parker of the Washington Post and National Review attracted cheers from the elite right when she spat, "If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself."

The Washington Post, which has devoted much of the past decade celebrating the Ensler culture, nastily declared that her "greatest hypocrisy is in her pretense that she is a woman." Those were among the kinder words written by one of its showcased writers on faith, a University of Chicago divinity school professor who also derisively noted that someone who "has a womb and makes lots and lots of babies (and drives them to school! wow!)" does not a woman make.

So what does make a woman...politically, that is? Hate and cultural conformity, to judge by the venom spilling from the nation's elite. Ensler promotes this, exhorting women to "vote with your vaginas" and put Democrats in office. She has urged them "to get our vaginas to the polls", in this last election warning that a vote for Palin is the equivalent of a vote for rape...the bad kind. Women -- and those non-traditional men who have escaped gender stereotypes to embrace a walk down the "vagina trail" -- should ask themselves: what would your vagina do?

However, judging by the sea of women in the enthusiastic crowds Palin continues to attract, Eve Ensler is not getting the answer she prefers.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/sarah_palin_revenge_of_the_vag.html

So, after absorbing everything leftists had to throw at Palin, which included distortions, rumors and outright lies Palin still has the highest job approval ratings of any Governor in the United States. They failed in their attempts to destroy her reputation and destroy her politically.

Palin backed David Letterman down and made him apologize for characterizing her as a "slutty flight attendant" and for saying her daughter was raped during the 7th inning in Yankee Stadium by a Yankee baseball player.

Still, the American Traitor John Kerry pressed on. In a recent interview, Kerry was commenting on the 4-5 day disappearance of the Governor of South Carolina and said...paraphrasing...too bad it wasn't Sarah Palin.

What scares the hell out of the American left is that Sarah Palin is a real American woman and totally unlike the poor imitations on the left.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 3965
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 26, 2009 11:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
i had no idea the vagina diaries was such a cultural signpost. i thought it was a comedy but it never made any impression in my neck of the woods... and i certainly have never heard of spiritual attainment through lesbianism!

as for sarah palin republicans voted for obama because of her...VERY scary! but not to the left...

if only the world were as black and white as some think!

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 1759
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 26, 2009 01:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
If Palin had been the Presidential candidate she would be President today and O'Bomber would be warming his seat in the Senate.

Republicans didn't vote against Palin; they voted against John McCain...for a variety of reasons.

The fact leftists continue to attack Palin is the best indicator they fear her politically and socially.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 3965
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 26, 2009 02:57 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
it's starting to sound like you are the only member of the republican party! you speak as if you at least know each and every member personally....i know, and have heard on the radio of, plenty of republicans who were swayed by palin's presence on the ticket to jump the fence. in fact i've heard the opinion expressed that palin's inclusion was deliberate sabotage on the part of the puppetmasters...to sway the election to the democrats. go figure!

of course there were plenty of other reasons republicans voted democrat, just like the once-socialists who voted conservative in europe because they were convinced the problem belonged to the party in power...typical swings and roundabouts - in the 80's it went the other way. and in the 90's another about-face by the voters. starts to look pretty predictable after awhile, eh?

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 1759
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 26, 2009 03:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
No one who IS a Republican would have considered voting for O'Bomber. That includes Colin Powell who showed he was a RINO.."Republican in name only" and as Dick Cheney said..."I thought Colin Powell left the Republican Party".

In fact, many Republicans didn't vote at all because they didn't support McCain and sure as hell wouldn't vote for O'Bomber.

It was Palin who filled up seats at campaign stops..not McCain. When separate campaign stops were scheduled Palin drew bigger audiences than McCain.

Now, in spite of your arguments, polls show Palin to have the highest approval ratings among Republicans.
http://people-press.org/report/524/republican-favorability

So while there may be some elitist Washington crowd republicans who don't like Palin it's plain that Republicans in general and conservatives in particular do.

Don't forget, Palin declared war on the Washington elitist set and did so in a very public way at the Republican Convention.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 3965
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 27, 2009 04:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
oh i forgot there's the republican cookie-cutter, and the democrat cookie-cutter, and never the twain shall be confused. line up to the right, folks, oops, how did that guy with the big D on his forehead get in?

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 1759
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted June 03, 2010 09:02 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
The lying leftist droolers in the so called main stream media wonder why Americans no longer trust them to report the truth.

After promoting themselves to the 4th branch of government and self proclaiming themselves to be the watchdogs of America's right to know; they lie, twist, distort, report rumor as truth, report innuendo as truth, report supposition as truth and shill for the most radical far left Congress and White House in the history of the United States.

They're no longer reporters and journalists.

They've become political activists and the propaganda arm of the Marxist Socialist Comrades in Congress and the White House.

These useful idiots have been fired and layed off in droves as their publications go under, get consolidated and downsized, yet they still don't get it.

A "Free Press, YES.

A "Lying Political Activist Press, NO

Is It Any Wonder Why We Call Them “Lame”?
Tuesday at 11:42am
Sarah Palin

It may seem like a small thing, considering the state of the union and international issues of the day, but let me share some facts surrounding a most recent illustration of the untrustworthiness of America’s mainstream media.

Yesterday, Todd and I spent our Memorial Day evening exchanging emails with NBC in regards to the interview they conducted this morning with our new neighbor. As you’ll recall, the “journalist” Joe McGinniss moved all the way from Massachusetts to Wasilla – literally right next door to our home – after tracking us down in various forums this past year, so that he could be close to his “subject matter” while he writes his book about me.

When NBC asked to interview me for this story, I politely declined. NBC then asked for a statement from us and promised to run it as a full screen graphic during their interview with McGinniss. We were glad to provide a statement and appreciated NBC’s promise to run it. Todd and I both crafted the statement very carefully because our new neighbor has taken to accusing us of “inciting hatred” – a charge which we obviously take very seriously. We knew that he would make more accusations like this, and we felt very strongly that such comments should not go unanswered. So, we emailed NBC the following statements:

“McGinniss has followed us for some time now, from showing up on our doorstep last winter, bidding over $60,000 for a military charity auction dinner with me, writing the hit pieces, attending at least one Outside book event, etc. He has a right to pursue his subject, I suppose, and certainly has a right to live wherever he wants, but my family also has a right to expect privacy, and hopefully to enjoy peace this summer. Good fences do make for good neighbors. The fence is now up, and I hope that we can enjoy peace. The media sensationalizes the recent McGinniss’ tactic so the public will tune in to whatever the latest episode is, always with ratings in mind, and that’s unfortunate.” - Sarah Palin

“What’s also unfortunate is journalists’ tactics like this, because it keeps good people from wanting to get involved in public service.” - Todd Palin

NBC responded to thank us for our statements and again promised that they would “make sure” that the Today Show aired both of our statements “as a fullscreen graphic during the segment tomorrow.” We were grateful because we knew that our statements would counter any accusation of “inciting hatred.” And boy was it necessary because in his interview on NBC this morning McGinniss doubled down on his accusation to actually compare us to the Nazis!

But there was just one problem: NBC broke their promise and didn’t run our statements after all. So, the “journalist’s” sensational claims about us being Nazis went unchallenged. We emailed NBC this morning to ask why our statement wasn’t aired. We were given a lame excuse and told that they would run it tomorrow (after the damage had been done) and that they would be happy to interview me about it (which was their aim all along because journalism today is all about ratings and not about truth).

The interview itself was quite an eye-opener. I’m not sure what “ugly innuendo” was in my Facebook post or why it is so controversial to suggest that the presence of a hostile “journalist” writing a hostile book about me is an imposition on my children who simply want to enjoy their summer outside. When I say or write “leave my kids alone,” it means simply that: let my kids have a fun summer without having a “journalist” 15 ft from their play area. How that equates me with the Nazis is quite beyond me. If receiving nasty emails and even death threats is the standard by which we judge “inciting hatred,” then the left in this country has been “inciting hatred” on my family for almost two years now. We don’t complain about this or call people “Nazis” because we value freedom of speech enough to believe that even ignorant and hateful people have a right to it. It’s a shame that a self-proclaimed “journalist” doesn’t understand this.

And it’s a shame that Todd and I had another disappointing encounter with the media on Memorial Day of all days. It was time that we could have spent with our kids and on a day when we honor those who have died in defense of our Constitution, including our freedom of the press.

Freedom of the press is integral to our democracy, but reporters must be held accountable because with power comes responsibility. A corrupt, deceptive, and manipulative media can ruin the lives of good people, disrupt families, destroy reputations, and ultimately hurt our country.

I’d like to believe that it’s not too late to demand integrity from our media. Thank goodness for social networking sites like this and new media sites which have allowed us to get around the “lamestream” media and present the facts. But let this story be another example of why you must seek out facts and truth about anything and everything you see reported today.

- Sarah Palin
http://www.facebook.com/notes.php?id=24718773587

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2010

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a