Author
|
Topic: oil or something more?
|
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 2304 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 21, 2009 03:37 PM
it struck me early on when i heard about the looting of iraq's antiquities that the war is NOT really about oil, though the money is obviously a big motivator for some. http://slewsgranger.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/third-fragment-of-hidden-sumerian-tablets-leaked/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jx4MGjI4m-k "they" are trying to prevent our real history coming out? too late, one could say.. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 986 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 21, 2009 04:09 PM
You still on that kick that Bush started a war with Saddam to steal Iraq's oil katatonic?If so, please show where the US has benefited from Iraq's oil. Show all the oil companies of the world who now have contracts with the Iraqi Oil Ministry. We don't even use Iraq's oil for our military equipment there. Gasoline, Diesel, jet fuel and lubricating products are trucked in from Kuwait. Another thing katatonic. I did a study and posted it here which showed that if every drop of Iraq's annual production of oil was taken...for nothing, from Iraq every year and sold on the open market it would take the US almost 20 years just to cover the costs of liberating those 25,000,000 Iraqi citizens. To conspiracy theorists there always has to be a different reason for something happening than the stated reason. You could read all about the stated reason by reading the Joint Resolution of Congress authorizing the use of military force to remove Saddam. Btw, most of those artifacts which were thought to have been looted...were found in a vault under the museum locked safely away from looters. Did your story happen to mention that?
IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 2304 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 21, 2009 07:21 PM
if you're going to join the conversation i suggest you READ the story FIRST jwhop! and not everything i talk about is written in blood either, in case you haven't noticed. this is a discussion board not congress...i find this an interesting side effect of our current military projects. in fact you might try reading the opening post before you go off into tiradeland. i'm not talking about oil at all! i don't think i mentioned conspiracy anywhere...but since those tablets talk about ET's coming down and giving us civilization, well i CAN think of some reasons those in power would not want the general public to know about them, can't you? and before you start on conspiracy theorists, please look in the mirror. you are the one who is convinced that obama is part of the SOCIALIST PLAN to destroy america and enslave us all... once again i find myself wondering why do i bother? IP: Logged |
koiflower Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Australia Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 21, 2009 11:42 PM
Please do bother, katatonic.We may not know everything, but we do think about things. We only get told enough to satisfy the mediocre monkeys. IP: Logged |
koiflower Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Australia Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 21, 2009 11:44 PM
As far as preventing real history coming out, this practice even takes place in a country called God's Own, that is, New Zealand, where political correctness rules, and environmental issues are high priority!Ancient artefacts that pre-date the Indigenous people have been found and destroyed!!! There are hidden agendas everywhere!!! IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 59 From: Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted October 22, 2009 11:54 AM
Kat, you're a reasonable lady so I've chosen your brain to pick for this one. Lucky! I ask this in all sincerity ... why take the leap from "heaven" and "divine" to ET's? IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 2304 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 22, 2009 06:42 PM
most of the ancient cultures have artifacts depicting helicopters, space ships, ets or SOME beings not human, who came with those vehicles... maybe the passengers WERE gods, or maybe that was the way they were seen by primitive peoples and they were just members of races advanced beyond the imagination of the observers. in any case it seems pretty apparent that at some time in the past SOMEONE or THING came out of the sky and taught humans things...the bible talks about them too. i don't have any real coherent theory about this. but it does pique my interest. once again i am not interested in getting into any discussions about the "oil motive" for iraq. and of course it's possible that it was complete coincidence that we chose to invade and desecrate the "cradle of civilization". that doesn't mean it's not interesting or possible. doesn't anyone wonder why buzz aldrin has been talking about seeing ets and their craft for 40 years? IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 59 From: Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted October 22, 2009 08:10 PM
i don't have any real coherent theory about this. aww man. i was counting on you! but it does pique my interest. that's understandable. it's a fun topic. the biblical stories ... yes, i think i know what you mean. it's a matter of orientation maybe. i think it's somewhat how the fundementalist Christians read about Jesus coming 'from the clouds' and so figure he's going to float gently to the earth out of the nearest nimbostratus. it's just too literal an interpretation for me. i do think we're being prepped to believe in aliens, which, to me, is worrisome. i never appreciate being prepped. ) anyway, i'm not looking to argue. just wanted your thoughts.
IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 2304 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 22, 2009 10:24 PM
yes there is a paranoid sector in my mind too that says why is this coming out now? i have a friend who worked as a remote viewer out of washington who swears that many people there have known at least since the first moonwalk that the astronauts DID encounter at least ET craft on that first visit. i do find it almost impossible to believe the official line that HAS been in place that no known intelligent life has been here so far... IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 2304 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 22, 2009 10:24 PM
i'm not thinking of jesus, but of the "nefilim" who bred with the daughters of men and the indigenous peoples who talk about visitors from the sky...and why would infinity have only US in it? and i am also highly suspicious of the david icke line, though a lot of his research makes sense it is all a little too pat and paranoid for me. so i guess what i'm saying is i find it very believable that we are descended in some way from creatures from somewhere else. and that history is older than the official version yet knows (or admits). i also believe that any REALLY advanced race has probably advanced beyond the need for flying machines ... though that doesn't mean they're not more advanced than we are. IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 59 From: Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted October 22, 2009 11:07 PM
Actually, I thought you might be refering to the famous Ezekial wheels within wheels passage, but I didn't have the gumption to go looking for an exact quote. quote: i have a friend who worked as a remote viewer out of washington who swears that many people there have known at least since the first moonwalk that the astronauts DID encounter at least ET craft on that first visit.
You know, I'm convinced that certain powers that be believe wholeheartedly that they're in contact with advanced alien races. quote: i do find it almost impossible to believe the official line that HAS been in place that no known intelligent life has been here so far...
yeah. I always work under the assumption that there's the "official" line meant for, as they sometimes say, the sheeple. And then there's the "officially unofficial" line given to the alternative nation. IP: Logged |
koiflower Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Australia Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 23, 2009 07:35 AM
This is about oil, so I'll post this first.... quote:
Hunt Oil KurdistanA Congressional committee concluded in early July, 2008, that Hunt Oil, an oil company with close ties to President Bush, was encouraged by the State Department to sign deals with the government of Kurdistan, despite strong opposition from Iraq's central government. Hunt Oil was the first company to sign a deal with Kurdistan, and did so before a comprehensive oil plan for Iraq had been decided upon in Baghdad.The New York Times: Panel Questions State Dept. Role in Iraq Oil Deal (July 3, 2008)1 Fast Facts *** Hunt Oil CEO: Ray L. Hunt *** Ray L. Hunt also on board of HalliburtonThe Washington Post: Bush Officials Condoned Regional Iraqi Oil Deal (July 3, 2008)2 *** Kurdistan passed oil and gas law in August, 2008 *** Date deal signed: September, 2008 *** U.S. State Department claims it tried to discourage dealThe Washington Post: Bush Officials Condoned Regional Iraqi Oil Deal (July 3, 2008)2 *** After deal completed, other oil companies signed deals with Kurdish governmentThe Washington Post: Bush Officials Condoned Regional Iraqi Oil Deal (July 3, 2008)2 *** President Bush denies knowing anything about dealThe Washington Post: Bush Officials Condoned Regional Iraqi Oil Deal (July 3, 2008)2 Hunt Oil's Deal According to House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, led by Henry Waxman, the Bush administration allowed the oil deal to proceed despite concerns that it could undermine efforts by the Iraqi government to craft a comprehensive oil resources plan for the struggling nation.The New York Times: Panel Questions State Dept. Role in Iraq Oil Deal (July 3, 2008)1 Ray L. Hunt, Hunt Oil's chief executive, is a member of President Bush's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and a key fundraiser for the Republican Party.The Washington Post: Bush Officials Condoned Regional Iraqi Oil Deal (July 3, 2008)2
http://www.mahalo.com/hunt-oil-kurdistan Another reference: http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=bush+oil+companies+iraq&meta=&aq=f&o q= IP: Logged |
koiflower Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Australia Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 23, 2009 07:48 AM
Investigating one's own curiosity is a good virtue, when it comes to matters of spirituality (imho).I am spiritual, yet I love science. I read the Bible years ago, but felt more spiritual in prayer, meditation and reflection. Living in an age of technology and education, has thrown all possibilities and probabilities my way, in terms of searching for the Truth. If I lived 100 years ago, I would never have thought of anything like television, computers or mobile phones, let alone the idea of a living entity walking on the moon. I feel open enough to 'take on' any information on evidence on space travellers. I wonder if Tom Cruise is onto something about aliens IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 986 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 26, 2009 12:10 PM
What bullshiiit.The Kurds...in northern Iraq have every right to sign oil deals...exploration, drilling, pumping, distribution and oil sales to any company they decide to do business with. The fact the Iraqi Constitution leaves large parts of Iraq under LOCAL control..federalism.. makes that possible. The fact the central government wanted the oil fields of northern Iraq as part of a central government scheme and control is irrelevant. Now, here's the truth. Neither Bush or Cheney have any financial interest in Hunt Oil company or Haliburton. None whatsoever. It's a natural occurrence that oil company executives sit on boards of other oil companies or oil service companies...to give advice and counsel. The same is true in other parts of the private sector. Of course, you could read the Joint Resolution of Congress which authorized the use of military force against Saddam Hussein. In that Joint Resolution of Congress the reasons for doing so are laid out clearly. We had the same crappy misinformation spewed about removing the Taliban...which gave shelter to al-Qaeda. al-Qaeda, the terrorist group which killed about 3,000 civilians, mostly Americans on 9/11. The drivel floated by leftists then was that Bush wanted war with Afghanistan...on behalf of Atlantic Richfield Oil company which wanted to build an oil pipeline across Afghanistan. The problem with leftist drivel is that they never think it through. No oil company executive, not even the dimmest dimwit would commit hundreds of billions of dollars to build a pipeline where any terrorist with nothing but grenades, RPGs or even a case of Dynamite could destroy large sections of the pipeline and keep doing it indefinitely.
IP: Logged |