posted December 13, 2009 08:09 PM         

If the election were held today, 43 percent of American voters would back Barack Obama for president, according to a new Fox News poll.

In what may be the ultimate job rating, 43 percent of voters say that they would vote to re-elect President Obama if the 2012 election were held today, down from 52 percent six months ago, from April 22-23, 2009.

Obama's job approval rating comes in at 49 percent this week. That's down just one percentage point from late September, but it marks a new low approval for the president --and the first time the Fox News poll has measured his approval below 50 percent.

Moreover, the number of Americans saying they would vote to re-elect President Obama has dropped. If the election were held today the poll finds more voters say they would back someone else in the 2012 election than would back the president...........
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-percent-vote-elect-president-obama/

posted December 14, 2009 07:12 PM         

Well katatonic, we've found something else you know nothing about.

I am in no way a "passive aggressive" personality.

This also calls into question your astrological skill.

posted December 14, 2009 10:36 PM         

and if you don't think scorp rising has the same tendencies i suggest you go back to the drawing board. vengeance and spite go right with that placement too.

and how pray tell does your late leo sun, early virgo merc and EARLY leo pluto all manifest at the midheaven?

posted December 16, 2009 06:36 PM         

But I just don't like Obama.
I've been keeping an eye on him and his actions so far are...scarey.

posted December 16, 2009 06:57 PM         

quote:

---

when the leo sun, the virgo merc are BOTH squared by saturn in taurus...passive agressive is never far behind...katatonic

---

That may be your opinion but it's just that...your opinion.

Saturn squaring my Sun and Mercury causes me not the least problem. Transiting Saturn squaring/opposing my Uranus or Neptune are big time trouble.

There's nothing "passive" about opposing a twit like O'Bomber. Nothing at all passive about that.

WinkAway, I agree with you...except for this..."Too bad Palin has been bashed by the media to the point of no return..."

Sarah Palin is now in a position to fire back on the media at will...and that's what she's doing...with devastating effect.

The fact is, the news media in general are not trusted by the American people and they're trusted less every day.

posted December 17, 2009 11:47 PM         

the opinion polls go up and down and are very little indication of anything. the flipflop in regards to bush will not last either.

posted December 28, 2009 08:52 PM         

which shows just how genuine the protesters at town hall meetings were, and their agenda. complete with a few people's reactions to the info...

it's just propaganda pure and simple, like your friggin daily polls, quoted only when they say what you want to hear...

posted May 12, 2010 09:59 AM         

Going Down!

In December 2009 only 43 percent would vote to reelect O'Bomber.

Now, in May 2010 only 39 percent would vote to reelect O'Bomber.

Confidence Improves, But Trust Hurts Obama
May 6, 2010 6:30 PM
By Reid Wilson

"Only 39% of voters said they would vote to re-elect Pres. Obama if the election were held today, while 50% say they would vote for someone else. A quarter of voters would definitely vote to re-elect Obama, while 37% would definitely vote for someone else."

posted May 12, 2010 12:30 PM         

So far, they've elected the Governor of Virgina. Elected the Governor of New Jersey. Elected the Senator from Massachusetts. Bounced a long term republican Senator in Utah. Bounced a long term congressman in West Virginia and they're just getting warmed up.

November 2, 2010 looms for the loons who voted for O'BomberCare, voted for the $860 Billion Porkulus Bill, voted to bail out the Banks...and AIG, voted to bail out and take over Government Motors and Chrysler, voted for the scam and hoax of man made global warming...Cap and Tax and have shown themselves to be the most brain dead group of leftists ever elected to Congress.

O'Bomber is next on the agenda. In the meantime, O'Bomber is about to get his wings clipped in November when newly elected and responsible Congressional members say...NO MORE.

posted May 12, 2010 02:10 PM         

Get a life. It's President Teleprompter who can't focus his mind long enough to even introduce his cabinet members...let alone make a speech.

President Teleprompter even takes his Teleprompter along when he's speaking..strike that..when his Teleprompter is speaking to school students.

Oh, and who is the clown they found to ridicule Palin? I've never seen or heard of him. Does just anyone get to bloviate on you tube and be taken seriously, by say,...YOU?

Palin is effective...as her support for candidates who won against the odds shows. There's going to be a lot of other demoscats going home in November...and some of their republican enablers of the worst political agenda in American history.

posted May 12, 2010 05:26 PM         

and goodness, man, whatever makes you think i take your opinion of obama or palin seriously? you had your mind made up the minute you saw them both. true depth there, true depth.

posted May 13, 2010 08:25 AM         

O'Bomber has proved I was right about him.

The problem for O'Bomber is that entirely too many Americans have caught on to the fact he's in way over his head in a job for which he is totally unprepared and unqualified. After lying his way into office, he's a miserable flop as president.

39% would vote to reelect O'Bomber...and that's going down.

posted May 13, 2010 12:23 PM         

as is usually the case i would think a certain number of chronic malcontents will be voting AGAINST the administration. another predictable lot will choose between the lesser of two evils as they see it. so who runs against obama will be a strong factor in who gets elected in '12. while it is likely that a conservative woman will be more likely to get to the white house before a "radical" one, i would not bet on ms palin doing any more to beat obama next time than last, when she was a deciding factor for many who had considered voting for mccain!!

posted May 13, 2010 01:58 PM         

I'd be careful about labeling the majority of American voters...malcontents. They're going to take care of O'Bomber's Socialist buds in congress on November 2nd.

posted May 13, 2010 05:16 PM         

i don't care whether you know who john cleese is or not really. he was commenting as an actor on palin's presentation which he saw straight through as parrotting. no biggie. he also made the point, from the perspective of some distance from the subject, that obama's election altered america's image in the eyes of the rest of the world - from joke to not. and that ms palin's election would return us to the comedy channel.

posted May 13, 2010 09:00 PM         

Exactly. It doesn't make a person stupid nor being a traitor,Anti-American for expressing his/her opinion.

I hope she runs too. It would make it easier for Obama to get re-elected. She was factor in why he got elected.

I think that we have Katie Couric to thank too!

------------------
Raymond

Supporting the Neurodiversity Movement