Author
|
Topic: "I Never Had a Real Job"
|
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2143 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 26, 2010 09:25 AM
So says O'Bomber's income tax evading Sec Treasury Tim Geithner. Of course you haven't Timothy and that's the problem. You are clueless as to how things really work in in the private sector of the business world. Never having had a real job would qualify you for an entry level job in the private sector..business world, say "mail clerk" but, it disqualifies you for the position of Sec Treasury. A bigger problem is that your boss Barack Hussein O'Bomber never had a real job either and neither have most of the Socialist clowns and theorists he's surrounded himself with in his administration. The results of hiring and appointing those with no experience in the private sector..business, at a more than 90% hire rate is the chaos and uncertainty we now see in the private sector which produces the real jobs for Americans. These "theorists" who never held a real job in their lives...jobs where people are judged...retained or fired...on the results they produce are responsible for blowing about 4 Trillion dollars of taxpayer money on TARP, the so called Stimulus bill, the utterly unworkable O'BomberCare bill and they're not finished yet. These theorists also want to grab and nationalize the energy sector of the private economy which will skyrocket electric rates, gasoline prices, food prices and transportation costs for everything real people use in their day to day lives. Real people, those who have real jobs and are the productive members of society as opposed to the drone theorists who have never produced anything of value in their lives. It's long past time to throw all these unproductive theorists...including O'Bomber out of government so they can get some experience in the real world making something of value to society. Rx: Get a real job and call me in about 20 years. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/04/25/geithner_i_never_had_a_real_job.html
IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 4809 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 26, 2010 05:28 PM
interesting. i wonder how many politicians have ever had real jobs. did jefferson? washington? for that matter kennedy? reagan?it would be interesting to see a quick write up of their occupations before being president or cabinet members. but in general the english gentry and other creative men who made up our founding fathers were not in the habit of having "real jobs" either. some of them did.. what job do you think sarah palin ever had? moosehunter? mayor? are these "real" jobs? many would say not. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2143 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 27, 2010 08:26 AM
I suppose you could find out if any of the people you listed ever held a real job...defined as producing something of value for society...if you really wanted to find out.I'll help you out by telling you Washington was a surveyor and that Washington and Jefferson ran large farms which produced food and other commodities for consumption by other citizens. Those are real jobs. As for Sarah Palin, her resume would include stints as a television sports reporter, a sports reporter for the print media and an owner operator..along with her husband...of a commercial fishing business. Real jobs as opposed to being a drone and drag on society as most leftists are. IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 4809 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 27, 2010 10:55 AM
president of bank is not a job? tv personality is? jefferson and washington were lords or their manors and the fact that they were in america not england didn't make much actual difference. if running a farm by the labour of slaves and other underlings is a job, is not running a bank? the federal reserve?? IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2143 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 27, 2010 12:07 PM
A dead horse argument katatonic...since Timothy Geithner himself admitted he's never had a "real job". IP: Logged |
MyVirgoMask Knowflake Posts: 2885 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: May 2009
|
posted April 27, 2010 02:09 PM
Wasn't Obama a lawyer? Isn't that a job? lol. IP: Logged |
Glaucus Knowflake Posts: 4220 From: Sacramento,California Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 27, 2010 03:05 PM
exactly being a lawyer is a jobhe was also a community organizer which I believe is why he gets labeled far left Marxist Socialist ------------------ Raymond Supporting the Neurodiversity Movement A Different Mind Is Not A Deficient Mind. http://people.tribe.net/4b0cf8c4-1fc3-4171-92d3-b0915985bf95/blog IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 4809 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 27, 2010 07:03 PM
my point was that what people define as a "real job" varies from person to person. i don't consider someone who works for themself has a "real job"...they are doing what they want no matter how much "value" they are producing. i think there might have been a little tongue in his cheek when he said that, don't you, if you were to be honest about using his own words to incriminate him? president of the fed res would definitely qualify as a real job in most people's book. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 3548 From: acousticgod@sbcglobal.net Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 27, 2010 07:17 PM
On January 26, 2009, the U.S. Senate confirmed Geithner's appointment by a vote of 60–34. Apparently folks in the Senate believed he was appropriate for the job, and that's really all that matters. The person he succeeded, Henry Paulson, described him as a "very unusually talented young man...[who] understands government and understands markets."IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2143 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 28, 2010 08:14 AM
Timothy Geithner recognizes he's never had a real job. I understand leftists are hostile to business and especially hostile to those who, unlike leftists have the drive, focus, guts and intellect to establish their own businesses and produce something of value for the societies in which they live. Anyone who believes..."community organizing", the intent of which is to stir up racial hostility, incite violence, incite the breaking of state and US laws, intimidate businesses and elected officials...IS..a "real job"..holds a viewpoint much closer to Hitler's Nazis and Brown Shirts than the viewpoint of mainstream America. IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 4809 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 28, 2010 10:49 AM
forget mainstream, without "community organizing" there would be no america. the alabama blogger pointed out that the american revolution was carried off by a minute portion of the population it supposedly represented. at LEAST half the people, by this patriot's estimation, really were not interested and tried to stay uninvolved. in arizona they have just implemented the right for the police to stop and search anyone who MIGHT be an illegal alien. why, as in your wall street suggestions jwhop, don't they go after the LEGAL CITIZEN farmers etc who hire illegals??? did you know that while ENTRY without permission is illegal BEING HERE without official permission is not? while WORKING and HIRING illegals is against the law, presence in the country without a written permit is not. "they came for the communists and i said nothing; they came for the jews and i said nothing; they came for the gypsies and i said nothing; and then they came for me, and there was no one left to say anything on my behalf..." community organizing has ALWAYS been a part of this country's life. that's what happens when people involve themselves in how their lives are constructed. brown shirts my arse. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2143 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 28, 2010 11:40 AM
As usual...in fact as almost always, you're wrong again katatonic.The Arizona law does not permit police to stop people at random and question them about their legal status to be in the United States. That's the kind of bullshiiit spread by the George Soros leftist open borders crew...and members of the lame brained leftist press. In fact, the new Arizona law mirrors the Federal law which is applied by the Border Patrol at checkpoints on main route roads and highways used by illegal aliens who have entered the United States. Oh, I don't want anyone to come for the Communists and other Socialists. I just want someone to ferry them back to where ever they came from when we throw O'Bomber and his Socialist comrades out of Congress and the White House....soon. Maybe then, O'Bomber and his comrades can go out and get real jobs producing something useful to society. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 3548 From: acousticgod@sbcglobal.net Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 28, 2010 06:39 PM
I believe Kat has this one right, too. It is Arizona's new law that they can ask anyone to prove their citizenship at any time. If you wish to PROVE otherwise, go ahead, but in the absence of that, the news is reporting that this is how the new law works. quote: Anyone who believes..."community organizing", the intent of which is to stir up racial hostility, incite violence, incite the breaking of state and US laws, intimidate businesses and elected officials...IS..a "real job"..holds a viewpoint much closer to Hitler's Nazis and Brown Shirts than the viewpoint of mainstream America.
I don't believe you have "the intent of which" right. Not only so, but a constitutional legal scholar is a real job. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2143 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 28, 2010 11:39 PM
No, katatonic has it wrong.In order for anyone to be asked to prove they are a US citizen or are in the US legally, they must first have been stopped for some other reason...traffic ticket...involved in a fight...involved in a burglary or some other incident which brings them into contact with Police. If they are unable to produce a drivers license, green card or other ID which would tend to identify them...THEN a police officer could reasonable inquire about their status having formed a reasonable suspicion they might be in the United States illegally. All resident aliens are required by federal law to have their green card on their person whenever they are out and about. All operators of motor vehicles are required to have their valid drivers license on their person or in the vehicle they are driving. Under this law, no one can be singled out for simply standing on a street corner or walking down the street and be asked to prove they are a US citizen or are in the US legally.
IP: Logged |
MyVirgoMask Knowflake Posts: 2885 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: May 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 12:34 AM
"Under this law, no one can be singled out for simply standing on a street corner or walking down the street and be asked to prove they are a US citizen or are in the US legally."Yeah, right. That would just NEVER happen IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 3548 From: acousticgod@sbcglobal.net Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 01:56 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100428/ts_ynews/ynews_ts1840_4 IP: Logged |
Node Knowflake Posts: 882 From: Nov. 11 2005 Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 08:41 AM
Obviously JW is reading the Palin Playbook. Even Karl Rove thinks AZ is out of bounds. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20003631-503544.html IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2143 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 09:33 AM
Illegal aliens have no business being in the United States in the first place.The citizens of Arizona support this new law at a 70% approval rate. Across America, citizens support what Arizona has done at a 60% approval rate. O'Bomber, Bush and both Houses of Congress are guilty of "Dereliction of Duty" and violation of their "Oaths of Office". With some exceptions, those in office, should be removed from office. The number one job...and oath of office of the Prez and members of Congress is to.. Protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I (insert name) do solemnly swear, that I will faithfully execute the office of (insert office) of the United States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" So, now we have foreign nationals challenging the sovereignty of the United States to establish and maintain the borders of the United States....AND leftists cheer. Arizona...and soon Texas...move to regain their territorial sovereignty, identify those in the United States illegally AND leftists Boo. I will not support any president or candidate or any Senator or House member or candidate for those offices who is so stupid or so corrupt they will not secure the borders of the United States and eject those in the United States illegally. Nor will I support any candidate for a national or state office who proposes to grant "Amnesty" to illegal aliens...in any form. Let all foreign nationals who wish to come to the United States get in line, wait their turn...AND enter the United States LEGALLY, respecting the laws and sovereignty of the United States. Otherwise, stay the hell out of the United States. Of course, I realize that "accidental Americans"...those who think of themselves as "citizens of the world" would screech, scream, whine, shriek and stamp their feet in impotent rage...that anyone would think of the United States as a "Sovereign Nation" with the right to establish, maintain and protect the borders of the United States. Up theirs.
IP: Logged |
Eleanore Moderator Posts: 105 From: Okinawa, Japan Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 09:51 AM
I don't see what the uproar is about. We have social security cards and other forms of ID/citizenship. When you apply for a job, you need proof of citizenship. There are so many things that require proof of citizenship that this is just a joke.I can't buy anything on base without showing my military ID and I haven't done anything wrong. Heck, I can't even go to my house if I've left the base without showing my ID to get on base first. But my being here is a privilege. Any Japanese police officer can ask me about my SOFA status if I'm off base for any reason, but especially if I'm doing something wrong. Why? Oh yeah, I'm not a Japanese citizen so I need PERMISSION to be here. I carry my ID with me at all times. I have nothing to hide. You can't argue a point ONLY on the assumption of possible wrongdoings by the cops. There are standards prohibiting them from simply questioning someone's citizenship for no reason. Is there a proven history of corruption by Arizona police? The problem is not that people will be profiled. The problem is that people will now be caught and deported. Anyone who has a problem with immigration laws that require permission to be in the US (or all the other countries that require it in the world) needs to address the larger issue. And, at the core, the issue is that people are fleeing from hell in their home countries. Instead of pretending America should be the saviour of the world, and accept and foot the bill for everyone else's problems, how about we demand that those countries be responsible for their own problems and deal with their own crap so we don't have to be overloaded by people fleeing in the first place? But, oh no. That sounds like a practical, real solution that might at some point sound like we're telling others what to do. Heaven forbid we even consider clout or force. No, no. Nevermind the state of our own nation. We can pay for all the poor people south of the border to have everything their countries aren't willing to provide for them. Break out your money trees, folks. IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 4809 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 11:59 AM
1. the checkpoints you talk about, jwhop, are already in place. bearsarcher mentioned the numerous stopping points on a trip thru arizona to california. they didn't pass a new law just to provide for more checkpoints! driven through arizona lately?2. eleanore, you are talking about military property which is generally under different regulations than civilian territory. i am glad you don't mind the regulations, and given the nature of military sites extra security IS WARRANTED there. but soldiers sign up for that kind of life. 3. it's not about racial profiling. that goes on already. a birth certificate does not prove anything since it shows no picture, fingerprint or ANYTHING that would identify an adult. easily stolen or forged. 4. already in arizona natives and hispanics are treated to some pretty heavy-handed treatment by the authorities. 5. this law makes stop and search legal. the officer only needs to say he has "reason to suspect" the person of being an illegal alien 6. once more i say, why not go the already obvious way and prosecute the slave-renters who hire illegal aliens? because deporting them just leaves a gap for the next batch to work on his farm or whatever the enterprise is. 7. yes it is true the feds are not doing a good enough job of securing the borders. never mind that it is now illegal to cross those bordeers either direction without a passport. 8. this situation arises with every new bunch of immigrants. ever see the gangs of new york? the natives may have resented the irish because they priced themselves lower and worked harder than any other more assimilated group - including blacks - but they were VALUABLE AS CANNON FODDER because the civil war was going on! so admit them we did, and most of the men first had to go to fight before they got to live anywhere at all. 9. this is going to hurt arizona financially in a myriad of ways. tourists who don't want to go where they might be harassed LEGALLY. california is talking about boycotting az, not my idea, but it's on the table...etc 10. this sort of pointing the finger at outsiders is EXACTLY the way the nazis operated. a rancher got killed, that is bad. but seriously, crime is not the exclusive property of illegal aliens is it? how does imprisoning all these people at the taxpayers expense prevent the next wave from coming to work on the ranches?
IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2143 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 12:21 PM
"5. this law makes stop and search legal. the officer only needs to say he has "reason to suspect" the person of being an illegal alien"This is simply not true and it's not found in federal or state law...including the new Arizona law. There must be probable cause to stop anyone and that probable cause cannot be based on race, gender, ethnicity or color of skin. Those citing this nonsense would do well to read the Arizona law...which mirrors federal law as it applies to this subject. If it's not racism, not illegal, not immoral and not fattening for the Border Patrol to set up checkpoints to check immigration status...then, it sure as hell isn't when Arizona police stop someone for an actual infraction of the law, become suspicious when they can't produce a valid drivers license, valid green card, can't speak English, etc...and decide to question them about their immigration status. It's just more blither, blather, bloviation and bullshiiit from the "open borders" crowd.
IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 4809 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 01:45 PM
once more it is the feds job to secure the borders. they are obviously not succeeding. i don't argue with that. california has plenty of under the table workers too.did you read the new law then? http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf [edit: an officer is allowed to claim under this bill that he observed a person making a gesture or nod that indicated he was available for work, and presumably his own discretion as to whether that person is doing so illegally. kind of like the "swerve" justification i describe below] probable cause and suspicion of wrongdoing are easily enough provided by any "peace" officer who wants to stop you. if in a car "you swerved" is a favoured one in cali...whether you did or not....and whether you did because they were tailgating you or not!! once they have stopped you they can often come up with OTHER reasons to search your vehicle or person. are we going to pretend this doesn't go on in a state riddled with immigrants and hyped up about it? edit: this bill does lay out terms for prosecuting those who employ illegal aliens. but sorry, weren't those ALSO already in place? IP: Logged |
MyVirgoMask Knowflake Posts: 2885 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: May 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 02:18 PM
Why is it always the people who never leave their little bubble who are always sooooooooooo concerned about those terrible illegal aliens? IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 4809 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 02:29 PM
in times when people are concerned about their prosperity and survival the "outsider" is ALWAYS a convenient scapegoat. of course the bill doesn't come out and say, stop anyone who looks native/hispanic for no reason at all. it does say that a verbal or NONVERBAL NOD OR GESTURE indicating a willingness to work is enough cause for them to be interrogated. that is pretty wide open to interpretation don't you think? IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2143 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2010 03:36 PM
You're making unwarranted assumptions. I've lived all over the United States so I don't live in any bubble. I do happen to like it here but Florida has it's own problems with illegal aliens. We just don't share a border with Mexico.Phoenix, Arizona is the kidnap capital of the United States and 2nd only to Mexico City in the entire world. Arizona citizens are fed up with the destruction of their private property, the cost of medical care and education for illegal aliens but most of all, Arizona citizens are fed up with the crime illegal aliens bring to their state and they've done something about it. The fact immigration is a federal issue cuts no ice. The feds have given up any jurisdiction they had over immigration by failing to carry out their oaths of office and their dereliction of the duty they had to citizens of border states. demoscats think this is going to be a wedge issue in the fall elections. It is going to be an issue and the American people are lining up against demoscats on the issue of illegal immigration. Further, last I heard 8 states are considering the very same legislation passed by Arizona and signed into law by the Governor. I understand Ohio is one of those states. If demoscats thought they were going to pass an Amnesty Bill for illegal aliens to secure their vote in the fall elections, they're even more brain dead than I imagined. If the RINOs, enablers and facilitators of leftist causes in the Republican Party believe they can get away with voting for Amnesty for illegal aliens, we're already quite prepared to boot their sorry a$$es out of office in the coming primary races.
IP: Logged |