Author
|
Topic: No Mercy For Illinois
|
juniperb Moderator Posts: 795 From: Blue Star Kachina Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 12, 2011 01:49 PM
A 66% tax increase is over the edge for any state in this economy while denying a lousy $1 tax on a pack tax of cigarettes . **SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – Democratic Illinois lawmakers beat a looming deadline and approved a 66 percent income-tax increase in a desperate bid to end the state's crippling budget crisis. **Lawmakers rejected a $1-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes, which would have provided money for schools. They also blocked a plan to borrow $8.7 billion to pay off overdue bills, which means long-suffering businesses and social-service agencies won't get their money anytime soon. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110112/ap_on_bi_ge/us_illinois_taxesinois ------------------ What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world is immortal"~ - George Eliot IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 4344 From: Pleasanton, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 12, 2011 06:32 PM
The link doesn't work. Booo...and now I can't find the story. I did find out that a new James Bond film is finally in the works (hooray).IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 4344 From: Pleasanton, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 12, 2011 06:39 PM
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0112/Illinois-tax-increase-why-l awmakers-passed-66-percent-income-tax-hike Sounds as if they had no choice. It's only up to 5% overall, and will automatically decrease over time as the state comes out of it's debt. Illinois is one of only a handful of states that still operate with a flat-rate tax standard regardless of income, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Even with the 2011 adjustments, Illinois would have one of the lowest tax rates in the nation, but the rates across the US are hard to pin down because most states, such as Iowa, have up to nine different tax rates for personal income. “In terms of taxable income, it’s not always an easy comparison to make [between states],” says Arturo Pérez, a fiscal analyst with the organization. Republicans criticized the Illinois package, saying that it would force companies to move to neighboring states and that lawmakers would use the tax revenue only to increase spending, thus bankrupting the state. “Here’s an investment tip for you: Put your money in moving vans. They’ll be in high demand,” state Sen. Kyle McCarter (R) said during debate of the package. State Democrats lauded the package for an extra twist: A spending cap would limit state spending through 2015. If lawmakers were caught exceeding the new limits, the new tax rates would revert to their original rates. “This is not a game, not a trick ... we’re really trying to handcuff ourselves and the governor in our spending,” said Illinois Senate president John Cullerton (D), according to the Chicago Tribune. IP: Logged |
juniperb Moderator Posts: 795 From: Blue Star Kachina Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 12, 2011 06:43 PM
Cigarette tax over a 2/3 income tax maybe? I smoke but that`s my issue and I would rather pay a higher cig. tax than see the lower or middle class pay more income taxes at this time in space. So how about splitting the tax? ------------------ What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world is immortal"~ - George Eliot IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 4344 From: Pleasanton, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 12, 2011 07:03 PM
It's not a 2/3 income tax, though. They said that to make the headline more sensational. The income tax used to be 3% and now it's 5% (a 66% percent increase). My state's sales tax is higher than that, so it really is rather small.Personally, I would go for the cigarette tax, but it looks like they did good. They built in spending limits, which -if exceeded- would bring the tax rate back down to it's previous rate. IP: Logged | |