Author
|
Topic: No Government Shutdown: Officials Agree to Deadline Deal
|
T Knowflake Posts: 3299 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 09, 2011 01:30 AM
Yeah great, youre all adorable. Had us on the edge of our seats'n sh!t . Phew, thank god. Bunch of a-holes. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/government-shutdown-officials-agree-deadline- deal/story?id=13333717 IP: Logged |
T Knowflake Posts: 3299 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 09, 2011 01:31 AM
worse than a mother effin' soap opera.IP: Logged |
T Knowflake Posts: 3299 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 09, 2011 01:31 AM
effin clowns.Who's extremely tired of the B.S.? IP: Logged |
Node Knowflake Posts: 1198 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 09, 2011 08:33 AM
More than tired, Mz T.....I spent a good part of the day [I was off] listening either to C-Span or other media, and talking to people about their opinions. Every-one in my private poll said Gov would shut down. Everyone! And even the strangers said it in serious tones, with semi disgusted looks on their faces. I moved recently, still in MD- closer to D.C..... ALL of the GOP Congresswomen were trotted out to say [that] they were totally behind the attack on Planned Parenthood. Then all of the DEM ladies rebutted...and they were stoked with a hard line in the sand. The riders that were attached to the bill had nothing to do with the budget, most of them were either societal, idealogical, or environmental. and included budget cuts that would undermine the economy, decreasing key investments and causing significant job loss. Wankers the lot of them. My OP? If the right wing extremists were truly interested in the budget they would go after the Military Industrial Complex. and energy. The original House R proposal called for about $30 billion in spending cuts from the 2010 level. But the Tea Bagger-inspired revolt forced the Pubs to increase that total to $61 billion. Harry Reid agreed to $38 billion, Which was more than the original proposal! But no, they are doing everything in their power to pave the way for the end of social services, health and Human services, and to reinstate the polluter-friendly rules set up by the Bush admin. all with the corporate tax break cherry on top.
IP: Logged |
juniperb Moderator Posts: 1543 From: Blue Star Kachina Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 09, 2011 09:32 AM
The budget mess showed how government isn't supposed to operate. No matter who's pointed out to blame, all will be and ARE Yep, this is getting old. ------------------ ~The Earth Laughs In Flowers~ ... Emerson IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 3159 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 09, 2011 10:05 AM
What total crap!Leftist screeching, howling, whining and shrieking has reached new levels. One brain dead moron congresswoman said Republicans were trying to kill women by cutting off funds to murder incorporated, Planned Parenthood which receives about $360,000,000 per year in federal taxpayer funds. Gee, who knew Planned Parenthood is the only place in the United States where women can receive cancer screenings. I sure didn't know that. So, all those poor women would have to go without if Republicans got their way. Who knew? We always thought poor women were on Medicare and or Medicade and could go to most any doctor they choose. But no, we now have it on good authority that Planned Parenthood is the only provider in America and Republicans want to kill women by cutting off federal funding for murder incorporated. Who knew? Some have suggested that federal funding isn't really a "budget issue". I don't know where they're from but $360,000,000 in the federal budget qualifies as a budget item.
IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 6218 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 09, 2011 02:39 PM
you don't seem to realize that a great many women who don't qualify for medical "aid" programs cannot afford the high cost of the tests you are talking about.nor that the fed money is not allowed to go to abortions... nor that in every instance lately the republican idea of "saving" money is to GIVE money to the wealthiest and take it out of the hides of the poorest. charming i'm sure.. IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 6218 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 09, 2011 02:40 PM
but i think T was referring basically to the melodramatic aspect of all this theatre in DC...and the fact that so many people were baying for the shutdown that would have cost more than all the cuts put together would save! IP: Logged |
T Knowflake Posts: 3299 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 09, 2011 05:32 PM
Great responses guys. Sorry, i'm tired today, so reply will be short.Thumbsup to what you wrote, Node. Kat, yes i was referring to all of that. And the mainstream media in general. Can't even watch or read it anymore. I don't get sucked into it really, but they are playing on people's fears and trying to take everyone for a ride. Like juni said, all of this has gotten very old. They're like a bunch of children. jwhop, quote: Gee, who knew Planned Parenthood is the only place in the United States where women can receive cancer screenings. I sure didn't know that.
Have to admit, I said the same thing. Let's get real. But, like kat said, many can't afford other options. & I don't think we've heard the end of this possible government shutdown ... IP: Logged |
SunGlas$Hole Newflake Posts: 12 From: Texas Registered: Apr 2011
|
posted April 10, 2011 06:04 AM
I wasn't even paying attention. haha. So things worked out? I don't even know what was going on. I will use my instincts to survive whatever happens, so I'm god.err good.IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 3159 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 10, 2011 12:17 PM
Sorry, the Planned Parenthood pinball machine goes...tilt!Further, the women's health care issue as it relates to Planned Parenthood goes tilt too. PP does no Mammograms, simply refers to other providers AND out of the more than 11,000,000 primary health cases for women annually, PP provided primary services for fewer than 20,000. Further, there are city, county and state run health clinics across the country. Further still, there are around 1,000 federally funded clinics around the country. Anyone care to argue with me that those city, county, state and federally funded health clinics DON'T provide no cost or low cost health care for women? April 10, 2011 Things Planned Parenthood's 'Truth Team' Forgot to Mention By Susan E. Wills Claim: "This is about women's health more than abortion" (Cecile Richards, PPFA President) This was quoted by Jonathan Alter in a March 14 opinion piece posted on Bloomberg Opinion. But Congress already spends billions every year for women's health care, through Medicaid, Medicare and other programs. Defunding PPFA is about no longer coercing taxpayers to contribute to the nation's largest abortion chain. In its last reported fiscal year (2008-2009), PPFA clinics aborted 332,278 children, a number equal to the entire population of Cincinnati. Since 1970, PPFA has aborted an estimated 5,300,000 children, equivalent to the entire population of Colorado. Claim: Without funding for PPFA, women will lack access to mammograms, primary health care, and other necessary services In truth, Planned Parenthood clinics provide no mammograms. They offer only referrals to health centers, doctors, hospitals and labs for mammograms. PPFA breast exams are done by manual palpation, similar to a breast self-exam. But as a National Institutes of Health MedlinePlus fact sheet states: "There is no evidence that doing breast self exams saves lives from breast cancer." For that, mammography is needed. As for primary health care services, PPFA clinics performed fewer than 20,000 such services in its last reporting year, an insignificant part of the total of 11.4 million services nationwide. Through state and federal Medicaid programs, low-income women already have access to contraception, as well as needed health care services-including testing and treatment for sexually-transmitted diseases (STDs), Pap tests for cervical cancer, and mammograms-at countless hospitals, doctors' offices, and over 1,000 federally-funded community health centers. IP: Logged |
T Knowflake Posts: 3299 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 10, 2011 12:42 PM
Thanks for the info. IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 6218 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 10, 2011 03:21 PM
but the cuts to PP are just the beginning, followed by massive cuts in the works to ALL lowcost medical aid including the services jwhop says we don't need PP for.as to mammograms they are less and less considered reliable or even safe in the cancer prevention stakes. and while you rale about "socialist" programs the top 1% of the world are sucking up all the "savings" these bills are supposed to provide. do you think they are going to turn around and donate to the health of the other 99% of us? or are we going back to debtors prisons, street beggars and almshouses? IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 6218 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 10, 2011 03:24 PM
if only, T, it were only the mainstream media pulling rabbits out of hats to create "ratings"...the entire "us against them" divide and conquer game is running rampant and we, the suckers, are expected to just roll with it. that includes you, jwhop...while both sides fork over our taxpayer money to the richest of the rich (and no, i don't mean those who earn $300K, though they are making 10 times the "average" income) it doesn't really make sense to focus on obama, who has been turned into a puppet or any other 'leader" - even if your sarah palin is honest now, which i doubt, IF she were elected she would be in the same leaking boat...IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 3159 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 10, 2011 07:17 PM
What I had to say about "crap" wasn't aimed at T..or anything T said.I actually agree with T that most elected officials are A-holes. However, I do disagree with you katatonic that O'Bomber has been captured by the rich. It's true O'Bomber was supported by the rich and powerful...heads of corporations and coupon clipper heirs to fortunes. It's also true O'Bomber has paid off like a slot machine for Goldman Sachs, some other banking interests and GE...for instance. But O'Bomber is anti-capitalist and anti-business...unless one of his army of czars is calling the shots. O'Bomber and the rest of the Socialist Comrades crew don't understand exactly who creates the wealth in America which O'Bomber and other Socialists are forever attempting to plunder. We are staring the collapse of the dollar in the face; along with the collapse of the US government bond market from which we have been borrowing 41 cents out of every dollar spent on all those programs. It's insane and the insanity has to stop. It's insane to believe government bond buyers and foreign governments will continue to fund the excesses of O'Bomber and the Socialist Comrade Clowns. The adults are going to win this argument over government excesses. IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 6218 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 11, 2011 08:27 PM
adults? such as? oh you mean those guys who refused to take one penny from those with millions to spare, but insist on taking school lunches out of the overweight budget?we had school lunches under ike, jwhop, and before and after too. was it socialist then?taking away the budget for that means kids drinking coke for lunch or whatever is in the vending machines..again, charmed, i'm sure! IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 3159 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 11, 2011 10:32 PM
Adults....as in those people, including the majority of American voters....who understand the US government cannot continue to spend vastly more money than the income stream that's coming in the door.Adults....as in those people, including the majority of American voters...who understand O'Bomber's recipe of raising taxes on anyone in a severe recession is the fastest way to kill any hopes of an economic recovery. I don't know where in the hell you were when Eisenhower was President but I don't recall any federally funded "school lunch" program. I was in California. Perhaps it existed, but I never saw it in any of the schools I attended. IP: Logged |
katatonic Knowflake Posts: 6218 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 13, 2011 12:35 PM
i was in public elementary school eating the free school lunches! maybe high school didn't have them but i wouldn't know about that. they were crap, mind you, one of the best was the "pizza toast", a smear of tomato paste and cheese on white toast...and the veg were almost rotten from sitting in hot trays, but they were free for everyone. of course in those days the tax on the highest bracket was around 90% ... but that couldn't be how we afforded it, could it? and, by the way, my father was in that top bracket and if it cramped his style i fail to see where! IP: Logged | |