Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  what makes this okay?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   what makes this okay?
katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 6967
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 01, 2011 04:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/09/01/310015/banks-still-fabricating-documents/

About a year ago, several of the nation’s biggest banks were caught in scandal over “robo-signing” — approving foreclosures without verifying basic information about the loan and fabricating documents to present to courts. For several months, a group of state attorneys general has been attempting to negotiate a settlement with the banks for their mortgage misdeeds.

However, those talks have broken down (as CAP warned they would), with the AG’s fracturing between those who want to craft a settlement quickly and those, like New York Attorney General Schneiderman, who want a deeper investigation into the banks’ activities. Meanwhile, as American Banker reported today, the banks have not stopped fabricating documentation in order to foreclose on borrowers:

Some of the largest mortgage servicers are still fabricating documents that should have been signed years ago and submitting them as evidence to foreclose on homeowners.

The practice continues nearly a year after the companies were caught cutting corners in the robo-signing scandal and about six months after the industry began negotiating a settlement with state attorneys general investigating loan-servicing abuses.

Several dozen documents reviewed by American Banker show that as recently as August some of the largest U.S. banks, including Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., Ally Financial Inc., and OneWest Financial Inc., were essentially backdating paperwork necessary to support their right to foreclose.

In several instances, banks were signing over documents from lenders that no longer exist. For example, one Bank of America executive “signed a mortgage assignment on July 29 of this year that purported to transfer ownership of a mortgage from New Century Mortgage Corp. to a trustee, Deutsche Bank.” However, “New Century, a subprime lender, went bankrupt in 2007; and the Deutsche Bank trust that purported to hold the loan was created for a securitization completed in 2006 — about five years before Juarez signed it over to the trust.”

Goldman Sachs has reportedly agreed to “compensate some home loan borrowers for wrongful foreclosures,” as well as put an end to robo-signing. Given the way that the banks have handled the fallout from this scandal thus far, that is a promise that should definitely be taken with a grain of salt.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 6967
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 01, 2011 04:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
when this story first broke, the mortgage cos had the sensible rebuttal...

"if you were paying your mortgage your name wouldn't be in the pile of foreclosures to begin with, this is a technical error and the fault of the victims." obviously, i paraphrase.

but they were lying then (too)!

the city of LA has filed suit against deutschbank for the ridiculously inadequate way in which they were dealing with foreclosed properties.

IP: Logged

Node
Knowflake

Posts: 1563
From: 1,981 mi East of Truth or Consequences NM
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 01, 2011 07:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Node     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don't understand why these guys aren't in jail.

GSachs is starting to comply [with this law]
after months of negotiations>?? They were supposed to comply over a year ago.

------------------
"the intersection between super-profits and megadisasters" in which "the preferred method of advancing corporate goals [is] using moments of collective trauma to engage in radical social and economic engineering." Essentially, the process breaks down to two parts: 1. Create or exploit a shock; and 2. Use the confused and chaotic aftermath to push through/assert a corporate and/or political coup with no threat of backlash from a traumatized public. Naomi Klein- The Shock Doctrine 2007

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 11252
From: The Goober Galaxy
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 02, 2011 06:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What's wrong with robots signing stuff? They are going to try to exterminate humans one day and take over the world anyway.

------------------
I have CDO. It's like OCD, but the letters are in alphabetical order, as they should be.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 6967
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 02, 2011 11:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
lol randall...it's the humans who say they don't give the instructions for the robots that are due for their come-back.

this is so reminiscent of those telephone employees who tell you "the computer did it" and when you ask them to tell the computer to stop they protest that that is impossible. where are the jobs? computers don't consider humans cost-efficient!

and it has been proven patently untrue that paying your mortgage will keep you off the foreclosure list, robo or human.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a