posted January 30, 2012 10:15 AM            

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal

posted January 30, 2012 04:36 PM            

Well, I'm not a Google fan nor am I a Google member. I also don't want my search patterns scanned by Google so they can offer me a list of search hits they think I would be interested in.

"The other is U Tube doing the same"

I didn't know about this but then, I don't spend any time to speak about on YouTube.

"Worse is Monsanto and genetically modified food Oy Vey"

posted January 30, 2012 11:48 PM            

monsanto's roundup is apparently responsible for new superweeds that outstrip anything they can come up with. and side by side with killer weeds will be the insects who adapt, licketysplit, to whatever the mad doctors come up with!

posted January 30, 2012 11:50 PM            

Fact, we have been eating Genetically modified foods for.. well, forever. Corn is genetically modified in that it is "sexed" and pollinated manually. We use genetics in order to keep specific veges from being attacked by various parasites and insects. Each time a gene is inserted in order to allow that to happen. That means it is genetically modified.

I believe in 100% reporting and that we should know when it happens. I also believe (which as not happened) that all meat sold in the US should have the country of Orgin and not the country of "slaughter" which happens now (meaning... Mexican and Canadian beef, which is not to our standards, only has to reside here for 60 to 90 days before being declared "American".

posted January 31, 2012 09:00 AM            

quote:

---

Okay.. I am now totally confused.. at first it seemed that the Mods addition was at the bottom of the page. Weird.

---

Mods addition? Now I`m totally corn-fused

posted January 31, 2012 10:19 AM            

We've had this same discussion here years ago about genetically modified foods and you and I agreed vegetable foods and fruit have been modified for thousands of years...by selective breeding..cross pollination or grafting in the case of fruit.

For the last 40 years...or so, table vegetable hybrids have been available which are more resistant to pests, fungus, wilts and nematodes...and/or taste better, or hold their flavor longer or ship better.

I don't know any more than I did when this subject came up here in the past. But, the concerns I have about modifying food crops at the cellular level centers more on how much of the pesticide and/or herbicide being inserted into these GM food crops finds it's way into the actual produce...if any.

It bothers me that I can't get this information from reliable sources. Perhaps you can..or already have!

posted January 31, 2012 11:24 AM            

no one is happy about the chinese imports either, but that is a separate matter from monsanto, who do everything they can to sew up the food supply - moving ever closer to "owning" all seed and patenting their "progeny".

then there is the major conflict of interest having michael taylor seesawing back and forth between monsanto and the FDA, who have given the okay to products with little to no testing, created labelling to negate the labels consumers insisted on regarding gmos in their food, etc etc etc. mr taylor has been doing the revolving door act for several years now.

rats are not people. however trials of several gmos on rats have shown results of deformities, organ failures, and reproductive failure over a period of a couple of generations. BECAUSE rats are not people, though genetically they are quite similar! we need to see some longer testing periods before we know what the effect of these new species are...and by the time a couple of HUMAN generations have passed there may be no turning back at the rate monsanto is pushing its creations.

posted February 09, 2012 02:40 PM            

The False Illusion Of Facebook http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/42201-the-false-illusion-of-facebook-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilT8YI6zPvQ
http://www.facebook.com/pages/David-Icke/147823328841

posted February 09, 2012 11:19 PM            

The poll done by Republican polling firm Wenzel Strategies for World Net Daily found something similar to my own recent analysis of state polling data that the 2012 election is beginning to look like a replay of 2008. The Wenzel/WND poll turned up the surprising statistic that no matter who the Republican nominee is, one fifth of the Republican voters surveyed are leaning towards voting for President Obama.

The only Republican candidate who doesn’t lose at least 20% of GOP voters to Obama is Ron Paul, and he loses 19%. The poll found that 54% of those surveyed believed that Obama had exceeded or lived up to their expectations, and 47% said that he had not. Sixty percent of Independents thought Obama has met or exceeded their expectations as did 52% of moderates. In the head to head match ups with all voters polled Obama leads Romney, 48%-41%, Gingrich, 50%-36%, and Santorum, 49%-34%. Ron Paul fares best against Obama and he trails the president, 44%-40%.

The truth is that the far right is freaking out because they don’t understand how so many of their fellow Republicans could consider voting for a president that they can only see through their Marxist/Socialist delusions about him. The reality is that the imaginary Obama they see isn’t the same as what the rest of America sees.
http://www.politicususa.com/en/republicans-support-obama

i think the last line really says it all!