posted May 22, 2012 11:57 AM            

Nope, can't say anything bad about O'Bomber. That's out of bounds...cause he's the prez. But, you can say anything you want about Romney because he's only running to be prez.

Where in the hell do they find these shiiit for brains morons to teach our kids. I swear, it should be a state crime for parents to send their kids to a public school. Call it child abuse.

(Audio embedded in article on site) http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/21/nc-teacher-threatens-arrest-for-students-who-disrespect-president-obama-audio/

NC teacher threatens arrest for students who ‘disrespect’ President Obama [AUDIO]

After a debate about presidential hopeful Mitt Romney and President Obama got personal, a teacher at North Rowan High School in Spencer, N.C. warned a student that speaking ill of Obama could lead to his arrest.

On Monday, Rowan-Salisbusy school officials suspended Tanya Dixon-Neely, with pay, for making that comment and others in her social studies class.

The Salisbury Post first reported that Dixon-Neely told the student that he could be jailed for slandering the president, and that several people were arrested for talking negatively about President Bush.

According to Michael Bitzer, a political science professor at Catawba College, no one was ever arrested for speaking poorly of President Bush, and you cannot be arrested for simply disrespecting the president.

“Her point about not being able to say anything ‘disrespectful’ about the president does fly in the face of the First Amendment,” he told the Post.

The student asked about President Obama’s bullying in grade school, and the teacher began defending the president, saying that there is no comparison between Romney, who is running for president, and Obama, the current occupant of the White House.

Because Romney is just running for president, he is not afforded the same respect as Obama, the teacher said, and the class should give President Obama the same respect as others before him have been given. The teacher is still employed with the school district and has not commented on the controversy.

“… you will not disrespect the president of the United States in this classroom,” Dixon-Neely said.

A video taken by a student captures the argument, but neither the teacher nor students can be seen. The Rowan-Salisbury School System released a statement saying that the incident should be used a learning experience.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/21/nc-teacher-threatens-arrest-for-students-who-disrespect-president-obama-audio/

posted May 22, 2012 12:20 PM            

That's outright thuggery acoustic.

posted May 22, 2012 12:25 PM            

quote:

---

... warned a student that speaking ill of Obama could lead to his arrest

---

posted May 22, 2012 02:49 PM            

plenty of thugs against obama too, you gonna take credit for them?

i don't think by any stretch of the imagination a child would be arrested for "dissing" the president. plenty of stupid teachers out there, for sure.

posted May 22, 2012 03:27 PM            

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal

posted May 22, 2012 03:28 PM            

I just have to wonder what nation these people think they're living in. Well, they were all for O'Bomber transforming America...but into what? Cuba? North Korea? Venezuela? The old Soviet Union?

I'll bet these very same people would have be overjoyed to have lived in the era when the Socialist Woodrow Wilson jailed more than 70,000 Americans for badmouthing him.

Or

When the Socialist Franklin Roosevelt interred untold thousands of Japanese Americans for nothing more than being ethnic Japanese.

Leftists talk a good civil rights game but it's all bullshiiit! Civil rights for them..YES! For everyone else..HELL NO!

Jail Time for Insulting Obama? Student Who Stood Up to Outrageous Teacher Speaks for First Time
May 22, 2012 at 10:21am
Erica Ritz

Over the weekend, the tape of a North Carolina teacher telling a student he could be put in jail for insulting the president swept the news.

Obtained by a student with his cellphone, it remained a mystery who the student that challenged the teacher was, though many were impressed that he held his own against the teacher, and without losing his temper like she did.

(Related: N.C. Teacher Suspended For Telling Student He Could Be Arrested for Talking Badly About Obama)

Now, Fox News has tracked down the individual in question, a long-haired boy by the name of Hunter Rogers.

Watch Fox’s interview with the Rogers and his mother, Gina, below:

(Embedded video on site) http://www.theblaze.com/stories/jail-time-for-i nsulting-obama-student-who-stood-up-to-outrageous-teacher-speaks-for-first-time/

“[The teacher] always has open discussions about the presidents and candidates, and she doesn’t want to hear anything but what she believes, and if you disagree you get berated and put down, and I just decided to finally get some proof of it,” he explained.

Rogers’ mother remarked: “My biggest concern is that this ‘teacher’ is responsible for teaching my child and hundreds of others, and she is not teaching them factual information.”

posted May 22, 2012 04:38 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by katatonic:
but you know, jwhop, you and those who continue to caricature obama absurdly while not addressing the real issues, just make him more famous. you are doing him a FAVOUR.

there's no such thing as bad publicity, remember? every performer knows this...

---

That's ridiculous

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal

posted May 22, 2012 05:08 PM            

quote:

---

I'll bet these very same people would have be overjoyed to have lived in the era when the Socialist Woodrow Wilson jailed more than 70,000 Americans for badmouthing him.

---

Wow! That's really a terrible adaptation of history. The Sedition act was aimed primarily at Socialists. The higest profile conviction was of a Socialist. 70,000 is an exaggeration unsupported by anything I can dig up on it (which is weird because I've seen higher numbers, and yet can't find any confirmation that there were even 70,000). Wilson shortened the sentence for hundreds arrested under the act.
That's a poor re-writing of history.

posted May 22, 2012 06:10 PM            

All liberals/leftists need to memorize are the words...right wing...fundamentalist...homophobic..racist...bigot...fascist...Nazi.

posted May 22, 2012 06:16 PM            

You just gave us a list of labels as if liberals are just like you in their throwing around of labels, and then you went further and attributed liberals with the same lack of concern over the meaning of the words.

posted May 22, 2012 07:44 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
Ami is right, in that it's easier to be a liberal/leftist in America. Liberals/leftists don't need to know much of anything at all.

All liberals/leftists need to memorize are the words...right wing...fundamentalist...homophobic..racist...bigot...fascist...Nazi.

Hell, leftists don't even need to know what those words even mean..and most don't know!

---

How hard is it to be for abortion? How hard is it to be for gay rights? Try being a Christian and accepted with people who believe these things. That is an accomplishment

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal

posted May 22, 2012 09:57 PM            

shura, are you telling me you don't think Woodrow Wilson was a Socialist Progressive? Sometimes you startle me. OK, we can dig Wilson up. I'll sharpen us a stake and hold it while you power the hammer. Who knows, Wilson, like Dracula might arise from the dead!

Eugene Debs was certainly a Socialist, but Socialism is not a one size fits all monolithic belief system.

You might be interested in reading this book on "Liberal Fascism". All the pieces fit perfectly.

"The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning
Written by Jonah Goldberg"

Excerpt

"Liberal Fascism offers a startling new perspective on the theories and practices that define fascist politics. Replacing conveniently manufactured myths with surprising and enlightening research, Jonah Goldberg reminds us that the original fascists were really on the left, and that liberals from Woodrow Wilson to FDR to Hillary Clinton have advocated policies and principles remarkably similar to those of Hitler's National Socialism and Mussolini's Fascism.

Contrary to what most people think, the Nazis were ardent socialists (hence the term “National socialism”). They believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free market, provided generous pensions for the elderly, and maintained a strict racial quota system in their universities—where campus speech codes were all the rage. The Nazis led the world in organic farming and alternative medicine. Hitler was a strict vegetarian, and Himmler was an animal rights activist.

Do these striking parallels mean that today’s liberals are genocidal maniacs, intent on conquering the world and imposing a new racial order? Not at all. Yet it is hard to deny that modern progressivism and classical fascism shared the same intellectual roots. We often forget, for example, that Mussolini and Hitler had many admirers in the United States. W.E.B. Du Bois was inspired by Hitler's Germany, and Irving Berlin praised Mussolini in song. Many fascist tenets were espoused by American progressives like John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson, and FDR incorporated fascist policies in the New Deal.

Fascism was an international movement that appeared in different forms in different countries, depending on the vagaries of national culture and temperament. In Germany, fascism appeared as genocidal racist nationalism. In America, it took a “friendlier,” more liberal form. The modern heirs of this “friendly fascist” tradition include the New York Times, the Democratic Party, the Ivy League professoriate, and the liberals of Hollywood. The quintessential Liberal Fascist isn't an SS storm trooper; it is a female grade school teacher with an education degree from Brown or Swarthmore.

posted May 22, 2012 11:43 PM            

I don't know a single "leftist" that believes everyone believes the same way about things. Smart "leftists" such as myself don't even believe it to be a matter of "belief." There is reality, and there are distortions of reality, and people fall all over the spectrum of being able to comprehend reality.

Obama isn't a far left radical socialist. No part of that adequately describes him. By his voting record, that site where people found out where they were on the political spectrum (remember? http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum26/HTML/001121.html) made him out to be an authoritarian "rightist," like yourself. http://www.politicalcompass.org/uselection2012

posted May 23, 2012 09:16 AM            

The 3 glaring examples of Socialist Fascist presidents in American history are Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Barack Hussein O'Bomber. Hillary Clinton would have been but the DNC snatched the crown out of her hand in the primary before she could be nominated and handed it to O'Bomber.

posted May 23, 2012 11:49 AM            

So you say acoustic. But as usual, you're just f@rting into the wind with nothing whatsoever to back up what you say!

posted May 23, 2012 11:54 AM            

quote:

---

But as usual, you're just f@rting into the wind with nothing whatsoever to back up what you say!

---

posted May 23, 2012 12:06 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
I've told you before acoustic...and I'll tell you again; I'm not going to resurrect Hitler so he can whisper in your ear..."I'm a Socialist, I've always been a Socialist. My pal Mussolini was also a Socialist."

The 3 glaring examples of Socialist Fascist presidents in American history are Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Barack Hussein O'Bomber. Hillary Clinton would have been but the DNC snatched the crown out of her hand in the primary before she could be nominated and handed it to O'Bomber.

Jonah Goldberg has it right acoustic..and you continue your unbroken string of always getting it wrong. That takes real talent acoustic...in a world where a broken clock is right twice a day!

---

Since I am too busy to write my own post *cough*. I agree with EVERYTHING in this one

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal