Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  State of the campaigns

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   State of the campaigns
AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 6716
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 26, 2012 06:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Criticism of Romney's Campaign Grows; Six in 10 Rate His Efforts Negatively

By Gary Langer | ABC OTUS News – 12 hrs ago..

Public criticism of Mitt Romney's race for the White House has risen sharply, with six in 10 Americans expressing a negative opinion of how he's handling his campaign and a majority responding unfavorably to his comments on people who don't pay income taxes.

Sixty-one percent in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll hold an unfavorable view of how Romney's handling his presidential campaign, up by 12 percentage points since mid-July. Far fewer, 35 percent, rate Romney's performance positively, essentially unchanged.

Barack Obama's ratings for handling his campaign are substantially better, 54-43 percent, favorable-unfavorable. And while ratings of Romney's campaign have grown more negative, favorable ratings of Obama's campaign efforts have gained 8 points since July.

These ratings follow controversy last week about Romney's remark at a Florida fundraiser that 47 percent of Americans don't pay income taxes, see themselves as "victims" and lack personal responsibility. Fifty-four percent in this survey, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, see his "recent comments about people who don't pay income taxes" negatively; 32 percent respond favorably, with the rest unsure.

There's also an intensity problem for Romney: Americans disproportionately see his handling of his campaign "strongly" unfavorably rather than strongly favorably, 36 percent vs. 10 percent; it's a similar split on his comment on those who don't pay taxes. Strong sentiment on Obama's campaign, by contrast, is evenly balanced.

As damaging as Romney's remark may have been, it appears not to be solely responsible for Romney's weak grade on handling his campaign, since ratings of his campaign performance overall are 7 points more negative than are responses to that comment. Indeed, even among those who see the "47 percent" remark favorably, nearly three in 10 also respond negatively to Romney's handling of his campaign overall.

In a sign of particular trouble for Romney, negative views of his campaign have grown by 18 points since midsummer among independents, who often are swing voters. In July, 46 percent of independents rated Romney's handling of his campaign negatively; it's 64 percent today. Romney's positive score among independents, at 32 percent, far trails Obama's, 50 percent.

Even among Republicans, more than one in four rates Romney's efforts negatively - 27 percent. While essentially unchanged since July, that's substantially more than the share of Democrats who respond negatively to Obama's work on his campaign, 11 percent.

As well as among independents, negative views of Romney's handling of his campaign have grown especially sharply among adults under age 40 - up by 23 points since July, to 69 percent negative - and among women, with negative responses up by 18 points. And there's a large gap among income groups: a 16-point rise in negative ratings of Romney's campaign among people with household incomes less than $100,000 a year, vs. essentially no change among those with incomes of $100,000 or more.

Less than well-off adults also are more critical of Romney's "47 percent" comment, responding negatively rather than positively by 57-28 percent. Those with incomes of $100,000 or more, by contrast, divide evenly - they're 18 points more supportive of the remark.

Obama, for his part, gets especially positive grades for handling his campaign, 60 percent, from people with household incomes of $50,000 or less; that falls to less than half of those who are better off financially. Still his rating is 17 points better than Romney's even in the $50,000-$100,000 range; only among $100,000-plus earners does Romney's campaign rival Obama's.

Among other groups, Obama's campaign efforts are rated positively by majorities of women, adults younger than 40, moderates (as well as liberals) and (especially) nonwhites; those compare with even splits among men and among people 40 and older. Among whites, Obama's 45-51 percent rating, favorable-unfavorable, is not positive - but beats Romney's 39-56 percent.

While these results are among all adults, they're essentially identical among those who report being registered to vote: Negative on Romney's campaign by 61-36 percent; negative on his tax comment by 54-33 percent; and positive on Obama's campaign efforts by 53-45 percent.

METHODOLOGY - This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by landline and cell phone Sept. 19-23, 2012, among a random national sample of 1,012 adults. Results have a margin of sampling error of 4 points, including design effect. The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates of New York, N.Y., with sampling, data collection and tabulation by SSRS/Social Science Research Solutions of Media, Pa.
http://news.yahoo.com/criticism-romneys-campaign-grows-six-10-rate-efforts-100132699--abc-news-politics.html

IP: Logged

juniperb
Moderator

Posts: 4963
From: Blue Star Kachina
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 27, 2012 09:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for juniperb     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
In a sign of particular trouble for Romney, negative views of his campaign have grown by 18 points since midsummer among independents, who often are swing voters. In July, 46 percent of independents rated Romney's handling of his campaign negatively; it's 64 percent today. Romney's positive score among independents, at 32 percent, far trails Obama's, 50 percent.

Sigh, if I vote for Romney, I throw my vote away. If I vote for Ron Paul, another toss away.....

I seriously wonder how many Independents feel squeezed out.

------------------
We dance around the ring and suppose, but the secret sits in the middle and Knows
Robert Frost

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 6716
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 27, 2012 12:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Fewer Satisfied with Candidates than in Any Campaign Since 1992
Republicans Less Satisfied than Democrats

You're not alone.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 6716
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 27, 2012 05:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Obama has more campaign money to spend than Romney

Latest fundraising reports show Obama has more campaign money to spend than Romney

By Julie Pace, Associated Press | Associated Press – Fri, Sep 21, 2012 11:20 AM EDT..

..

WASHINGTON (AP) -- At the end of August, President Barack Obama had about $88.8 million to spend on the final months of the campaign, nearly twice as much as Republican rival Mitt Romney, according to campaign fundraising reports released Thursday.

While Romney's report showed he had $50.4 million to spend as of Aug. 31, he also owed $15 million on a $20 million loan taken that month.

The loan helped Romney pay for mailings, staff salaries and TV advertising — and it helped his finances appear healthier on paper. It also boosted his cash-on-hand total from $35.4 million — a number that's closer to a third of Obama's haul.

While Romney raised about $66.6 million in August to Obama's $84.7 million, the $20 million loan boosts Romney's total receipts to $86.6 million, slightly higher than his Democratic opponent's take.

Both Romney and Obama spent about as much as they raised during the month of August. Romney spent about $66.4 million, while Obama spent about $83.7 million.

Romney and the Republican Party raised more than $111 million combined. That was less than Obama and the Democrats, who raised more than $114 million.

Romney took out a $20 million loan in late August, in the days before his campaign had access to funds they had raised for the general election because he was not yet the official nominee. He used general election money as collateral for the loan.

The new report shows he paid back $5 million before the end of August. The campaign said it had paid back an additional $4 million in September, although that data won't be publicly recorded until next month.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-more-campaign-money-spend-152041599.html

Ironic, right? The "businessman" Romney is managing money worse than the guy who supposedly has no private sector experience. Hmmm... are Republicans good with money, or are they crap with it?

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 8968
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 27, 2012 06:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
we should take a leaf from karl rove's book and concentrate on the houses. it won't matter who is president if congress continues to act the way they have been...

and we need a reasonable, intelligent congress who do not obey the likes of karl rove and grover norquist, but represent their constituents as is their actual job.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 6716
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 28, 2012 07:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 5951
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 28, 2012 10:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yeah, we've seen how the O'Bomber feel good crowd loads their polls...with demoscats.

Not working though acoustic. But hey, if mental masturbation makes you feel good..go for it.

Just don't whine, screech, howl and shriek if O'Bomber loses in November...that the election was stolen. That's what idiot leftist polling organizations are trying to do now. Steal an election by discouraging Republicans and Independents into staying home on election day.

It's not working.

O'Bomber would be a lot better off hiring some ballot box stuffers in Florida and Ohio.

IP: Logged

Node
Knowflake

Posts: 2047
From: 1,981 mi East of Truth or Consequences NM
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 29, 2012 08:31 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Node     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
we should take a leaf from karl rove's book and concentrate on the houses. it won't matter who is president if congress continues to act the way they have been...
and we need a reasonable, intelligent congress who do not obey the likes of karl rove and grover norquist, but represent their constituents as is their actual job.

Compromise has become a dirty word.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 6716
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 29, 2012 05:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Jwhop, I'm not known for being delusional, nor choosing poor sources.

quote:
Steal an election by discouraging Republicans and Independents into staying home on election day.

I thought Republicans, particularly in your state, were trying to steal this election.

You and Ami are ample evidence that Republicans don't follow good polls, so the likelihood of these poll affecting the outcome is probably nil.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 8968
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 29, 2012 08:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
getting ready to justify your losses, jwhop? that's what rush has been doing lately...trying to cover his bets both ways. if the republicans do well he will pat himself, and if they lose he will say "i told you so, those nasty dems psyched people out.."

if anyone who sees the polls going in the opposite direction and decides not to vote because his side can't win, it's not the fault of either party for looking better...its the fault of the no-hope attitude of such voters.

seeing my candidates losing would make it MORE important to me to vote, not a signal to stay home.

you must have so much faith in your fellow travellers~

i never heard anyone blame a party for pointing out how well it is doing in the polls. until rush. but he will stop at nothing to look smarter than everyone else.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 6716
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 30, 2012 07:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I learned this morning that FoxNews has been on a campaign to try to denigrate the polls. That's where all this stuff comes from.

You're right, though. If Conservatives don't like the polls they're seeing, it's highly doubtful that they're just going to submit to their accuracy by not going to polls to vote.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2012

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a