Author
|
Topic: Five facts about Fox News (by Pew)
|
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8310 From: Pleasanton, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 14, 2014 01:46 PM
January 14, 2014By Jesse HolcombLeave a comment One of the most closely observed—and powerful—figures in the news business, Fox News Channel President Roger Ailes, is the subject of a 560-page biography being released today. Even before its publication, “The Loudest Voice in the Room” by journalist Gabriel Sherman has triggered jousting matches between Ailes’ legions of critics and defenders. Whatever one’s view of Ailes, it is undeniable that he has turned the 17-year-old Fox News Channel into a powerhouse that dominates the cable news ratings and wields substantial power in the world of conservative politics. Below are five facts about the organization that changed the face of cable news: 1 Fox News was very tough on the last Democratic candidate for president. (But MSNBC was even tougher on the Republican). During the late stages of the 2012 presidential campaign, a Pew Research analysis found that Barack Obama received far more negative coverage than positive on the Fox News Channel. Yet Fox found its ideological mirror image in MSNBC. In the final stretch of the campaign, nearly half (46%) of Obama’s coverage on Fox was negative, while just 6% was positive in tone. But MSNBC produced an even harsher narrative about the Republican in the race: 71% of Romney’s coverage was negative, versus 3% positive. 2 The Fox News audience skews more ideological than that of its two main competitors. Fully, 60% of Fox News viewers describe themselves as conservative, compared with 23% who say they are moderate and 10% who are liberal, according to a 2012 survey by the Pew Research Center. By contrast, the ideological makeup of CNN viewers (32% conservative, 30% moderate, 30% liberal) and MSNBC viewers (32% conservative, 23% moderate, 36% liberal) is far more mixed. 3 Fox News is expensive. If you’re a cable subscriber, you pay roughly 89 cents per month for the Fox News Channel, based on 2012 estimates provided by the industry research firm SNL Kagan. Cable channels generate much of their revenue from “license fees” they receive from cable companies in exchange for carriage in households. Those fees are passed along in subscribers’ monthly cable bills. Fox has aggressively negotiated its license fees, and now claims one of the highest average rates per subscriber. Only six non-premium cable channels command higher fees than Fox. CNN, by contrast, is estimated to average 57 cents per subscriber per month and MSNBC, 18 cents. 4 Fox still leads in audience, but that audience is smaller than it used to be. In 2013, Fox’s prime-time viewership declined 6% from the previous year, according to median monthly viewership data provided by Nielsen Media Research. But with 1.7 million viewers each evening, the channel still drew a bigger audience than CNN, MSNBC and HLN combined. Fox surpassed then-leader CNN in prime-time viewership in 2002, and has never looked back. However, there is some evidence of a ceiling for audience growth. Fox has not increased its median evening viewership since 2009. 5 Fox outspends its rivals. In 2009, Fox surpassed CNN as the cable news outlet that spends the most money each year. In 2012, the channel was estimated by SNL Kagan to spend $820 million—on everything from salaries for on-air talent to maintaining bureaus and keeping the lights on. That spending was up 11% from 2011 levels, according to Kagan data. CNN was estimated to spend $682 million on news gathering in 2012, and MSNBC, which draws partially upon the resources of parent NBC News, $240 million. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/14/five-facts-about-fox-news/ Too bad we can't remove Fox News from our cable packages, huh? Save that ninety cents. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 36399 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 14, 2014 01:48 PM
CNN is slanted and clearly biased. FOX shows both sides. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8310 From: Pleasanton, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 14, 2014 03:09 PM
Fox doesn't show both sides more than CNN does. I mean, I haven't watched either recently, but last I checked CNN would go out of their way to offer the other side a voice...even if that voice was making statements in obvious opposition to the facts. Because I follow CNN on Facebook, I also know that they brought Crossfire back, which wouldn't work as a show if it didn't incorporate the other side.IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 898 From: Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted January 14, 2014 03:48 PM
It's mass media. Bought and paid for. Some watch Fox for the same reason others watch CNN. They tell you what you want to hear. ie None of that pain in the arse critical thinking required.Go team! IP: Logged |
juniperb Moderator Posts: 7939 From: Blue Star Kachina Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 14, 2014 07:28 PM
quote: Some watch Fox for the same reason others watch CNN. They tell you what you want to hear. ie None of that pain in the arse critical thinking required.
Six in one a half dozen in the other.It doesn`t matter because the bias of self will interpret to suit themself. ------------------ Christian, Jew, Muslim, Shaman, Zoroastrian, stone, ground, mountain, river, each has a secret way of being with the Mystery, unique and not to be judged. Rumi IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8310 From: Pleasanton, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 14, 2014 07:29 PM
Go team!IP: Logged |
juniperb Moderator Posts: 7939 From: Blue Star Kachina Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 17, 2014 11:31 AM
I don`t watch Fox so wondered if it has a point/counterpoint type interviews?------------------ Christian, Jew, Muslim, Shaman, Zoroastrian, stone, ground, mountain, river, each has a secret way of being with the Mystery, unique and not to be judged. Rumi IP: Logged |
Faith Moderator Posts: 6690 From: Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted January 17, 2014 12:06 PM
quote: Originally posted by shura: It's mass media. Bought and paid for. Some watch Fox for the same reason others watch CNN. They tell you what you want to hear. ie None of that pain in the arse critical thinking required.Go team!
I don't know why it's taking some people forever to realize this. IP: Logged |
Faith Moderator Posts: 6690 From: Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted January 17, 2014 12:40 PM
More about Fox News:1) quote: The channel was created by Australian-American media mogul Rupert Murdoch.
2) quote: In 1995, Murdoch's Fox Network became the object of scrutiny from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), when it was alleged that News Ltd.'s Australian base made Murdoch's ownership of Fox illegal. However, the FCC ruled in Murdoch's favour, stating that his ownership of Fox was in the best interests of the public. That same year, Murdoch announced a deal with MCI Communications to develop a major news website and magazine, The Weekly Standard.
Link 3) quote: The Weekly Standard is an American neoconservative[2][3][4][5][6] opinion magazine[7] published 48 times per year. Its founding publisher, News Corporation, debuted the title September 18, 1995. Currently edited by founder William Kristol and Fred Barnes, the Standard has been described as a "redoubt of neoconservatism" and as "the neo-con bible"[/b]
4) quote: Kristol is associated with a number of prominent conservative think tanks. He was chairman of the New Citizenship Project from 1997 to 2005. In 1997, he co-founded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) with Rober Kagan.[/URL]
(Robert Kagan is father of Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan.) 5) quote: The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was an American think tank based in Washington, D.C. established in 1997 as a non-profit educational organization founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The PNAC's stated goal is "to promote American global leadership."[1] Fundamental to the PNAC were the view that "American leadership is both good for America and good for the world" and support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity."[2] With its members in numerous key administrative positions, the PNAC exerted influence on high-level U.S. government officials in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush and affected the Bush Administration's development of military and foreign policies, especially involving national security and the Iraq War.[3][4]
6) Most of the members of PNAC are dual US-Isreali citizens. MANY government leaders are dual US-Israeli citizens. See list. Disclaimer: "Many people read articles against Zionism and inaccurately consider it against Jewish people. Zionists are an elite group, aligned with one world government agendas, who even treat other Jewish people who are not elite as inferior." 7) Is Rupert Murdoch Jewish at all? quote: In 2006, he was awarded the Simon Wiesenthal Center's Humanitarian Laureate Award. In 2009, he opened his acceptance speech for an American Jewish Committee award by saying, "over the years, some of my wildest critics seem to have assumed I am Jewish. At the same time, some of my closest friends wish I were. So tonight, let me set the record straight: I live in New York. I have a wife who craves Chinese food. And people I trust tell me I practically invented the word "chutzpah."
Israel Without Rupert Murdoch edited...still researching...
---- The puzzle pieces all come together quite well when one actually follows the whole story instead of gobbling up the media's own fairytale about itself. IP: Logged |
Faith Moderator Posts: 6690 From: Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted January 17, 2014 12:45 PM
Before Ami goes ballistic, I repeat: quote: "Many people read articles against Zionism and inaccurately consider it against Jewish people. Zionists are an elite group, aligned with one world government agendas, who even treat other Jewish people who are not elite as inferior."
Learn the difference. IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 898 From: Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted January 17, 2014 12:49 PM
Faith to everythingIP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 898 From: Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted January 17, 2014 12:50 PM
For distinguished service http://www.jinsa.org/events-programs/jackson-award-dinners/all?page=2 guess I can't argue with that. they certainly weren't serving US interests. IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 1183 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted January 17, 2014 12:55 PM
Murdoch may be a Zionist but like quite a few of them, that does not make him Jewish. I don't recall any whisper that he is. He is just Rupert Murdoch, and power thru media and money is his game . He went to an elite English university but returned to take up the family business when his father died. He has been dumbing down good news outlets ever since, unless they were already tabloids like the now defunct News of the World... It is a fairly recent (20 year) development that he has had the power to operate at the level of Fox, the London Times and now the WSJ Of course there is the argument that a Jewish parent makes one Jewish. This is highly debatable and as the child of the child of a Jewish family, being rekated does not make one a Jew or a Zionist. IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 1183 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted January 17, 2014 12:59 PM
Israel is a pawn, as Ariel Sharon hinted many years ago, in the wider power game. He recognized the price to autonomy that came with US aid. IP: Logged |
Faith Moderator Posts: 6690 From: Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted January 17, 2014 01:03 PM
Right, Cata. Though I think that the power elite will just spy out opportunities to suck the lifeblood out of any country whose strengths they can leverage on their behalf, without any respect for the actual country, its laws, or traditions.
IP: Logged |
Faith Moderator Posts: 6690 From: Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted January 17, 2014 01:06 PM
quote: Originally posted by shura: For distinguished service http://www.jinsa.org/events-programs/jackson-award-dinners/all?page=2 guess I can't argue with that. they certainly weren't serving US interests.
War profiteering neocons and their lackeys, all of them. IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 1183 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted January 17, 2014 01:09 PM
There are divisions within divisions, that is our greatest hope, and the fact that total control will never succeed except veey briefly.No, power is its own family, though they do tend to keep it in the family because it creates more "cords"... I believe Rupert is a tool who fell into the web thru his own vengeful desire to TOPPLE the closed-shop "establishment" IP: Logged |
Faith Moderator Posts: 6690 From: Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted January 17, 2014 01:23 PM
I think the social dynamic of these elites has a life of its own, where power-lust itself is the common denominator bringing them all together, and power-lust is the hallmark of most of the changes their pooled efforts bring about.
IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 898 From: Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted January 17, 2014 01:34 PM
I'd add traitors to the list, Faith.No unity in evil. The factions fight amongst themselves. That's our best hope imo. But it's failing, I think. IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 1183 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted January 17, 2014 02:11 PM
I know some people from this class, though I would call most of them black sheep. It is necessary to realize that many of these people not only want power, but believe they are better at deciding how the world will run best than the rest of us...peasants...for the good of "all". I recently stumbled across Downton Abbey which is another version of this same rift...the noblesse oblige versus the people's rights...which started picking up steam just after WWI when the series takes place.This is their greatest strength, and gives them the justification for being ruthless in carrying out their plans. IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 898 From: Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted January 17, 2014 03:02 PM
yes some of the 'good' bad guys genuinely believe they are doing the right thing. They believe the best of the peasants will chose correctly and thereby save themselves. The others are responsible for their own demise. Prince Charles just flashed across the screen. He's as decent an example as any. Beneficent tyrants these types are. In the minority though imo.IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 1183 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted January 17, 2014 03:22 PM
Murdoch was looked down on by the British Establishment and they did their best to lock him out. That only made him work harder to bring them down to his level, or himself up to theirs. And so he became more like them than they themselves in some ways,while thumbing his nose at their idea of taste and business ethics..which is why they jumped on the chance to scandalize him out of business when the opportunity arose. This is one portion of the infighting laid open for all who look IP: Logged |
juniperb Moderator Posts: 7939 From: Blue Star Kachina Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 18, 2014 10:48 AM
From Faiths link to 6) Most of the members of PNAC are dual US-Isreali citizens. MANY government leaders are dual US-Israeli citizens. See list. quote: If you think we’re being unfair here, ask yourself: How you would react to the Head of Homeland Security if he or she were a dual national with citizenship in Iran, Lebanon or Saudi Arabia? Ask yourself why you don’t feel the same about Israeli dual citizenship. Then you will understand how powerful the Israeli lobby has been in “adjusting” your acceptance of their special status.
keep in mind this list was 2OO8. Dual Citizenship — Loyal to Whom? American / Isreali Dual Citizens Running the American Government Attorney General – Michael Mukasey Head of Homeland Security – Michael Chertoff Chairman Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board – Richard Perle Deputy Defense Secretary (Former) – Paul Wolfowitz Under Secretary of Defense – Douglas Feith National Security Council Advisor – Elliott Abrams Vice President Dick Cheney’s Chief of Staff (Former) – “Scooter” Libby White House Deputy Chief of Staff – Joshua Bolten Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs – Marc Grossman Director of Policy Planning at the State Department – Richard Haass U.S. Trade Representative (Cabinet-level Position) – Robert Zoellick Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board – James Schlesinger UN Representative (Former) – John Bolton Under Secretary for Arms Control – David Wurmser Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board – Eliot Cohen Senior Advisor to the President – Steve Goldsmith Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary – Christopher Gersten Assistant Secretary of State – Lincoln Bloomfield Deputy Assistant to the President – Jay Lefkowitz White House Political Director – Ken Melman National Security Study Group – Edward Luttwak Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board – Kenneth Adelman Defense Intelligence Agency Analyst (Former) – Lawrence (Larry) Franklin National Security Council Advisor – Robert Satloff President Export-Import Bank U.S. – Mel Sembler Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families – Christopher Gersten Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Public Affairs – Mark Weinberger White House Speechwriter – David Frum White House Spokesman (Former) – Ari Fleischer Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board – Henry Kissinger Deputy Secretary of Commerce – Samuel Bodman Under Secretary of State for Management – Bonnie Cohen Director of Foreign Service Institute – Ruth Davis http://salonesoterica.wordpress.com/2008/04/03/dual-us-israeli-citizens-running-american-government/
------------------ Christian, Jew, Muslim, Shaman, Zoroastrian, stone, ground, mountain, river, each has a secret way of being with the Mystery, unique and not to be judged. Rumi
IP: Logged |
juniperb Moderator Posts: 7939 From: Blue Star Kachina Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 18, 2014 11:06 AM
I got carried away on Faiths link This mind control quote struck me as all too real , effective and we see it applied daily . quote: Joseph Stalin“More than half a century ago Hitler said the masses take a long time to understand and remember, thus it is necessary to repeat the message time and time and time again. The public must be conditioned to accept the claims that are made…no matter how outrageous or false those claims might be.”
- Carl Jensen-Mind Control Quotes ------------------ Christian, Jew, Muslim, Shaman, Zoroastrian, stone, ground, mountain, river, each has a secret way of being with the Mystery, unique and not to be judged. Rumi IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 1183 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted January 18, 2014 11:33 AM
Yes Perhaps all the MeinKampfs being read will show people what the tactics are? It is a hopeful trend that viewers bwtween 25-54 are walking away from Fox, but are they understanding it is all the media...and anything being a "talking point" is either propaganda or filler designed to numb the mind?Just had an image of a nation of braindead folk hooked up to (micro)life support systems too look alive so their "votes" will be counted and no one be the wiser? The addictive nature of portable media is chilling... I di recommend MeinMein kampf...as a famous performer once half-joked, it is a great primer in audience control and in the techniques used against publics everywhere. IP: Logged |