Author
|
Topic: I Guess Obama Didn't Get The Memo: No Warming For 17 Years!
|
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 6981 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 26, 2014 02:13 PM
Not trying to convince you acoustic. You're beyond help.Just for your information...in case you missed this in your vast legal background; the intelligence communities don't bring criminal charges in any court of law..or in military courts of justice. Just so you know acoustic..which you obviously didn't know. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8529 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 26, 2014 04:11 PM
The FBI does, and it was the FBI following Kerry. Sorry to burst your bubble.IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 6981 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 26, 2014 06:33 PM
Wrong again acoustic.The FBI is an investigative agency. They bring NO CHARGES, they pursue NO INDICTMENTS, they CONDUCT NO TRIALS. Period. Charges, indictments and trials of federal crimes are carried out by the US Justice Dept. Hey acoustic, you're still meeting my every expectation for you. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8529 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 26, 2014 07:42 PM
What authority do FBI special agents have to make arrests in the United States, its territories, or on foreign soil?In the U.S. and its territories, FBI special agents may make arrests for any federal offense committed in their presence or when they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed, or is committing, a felony violation of U.S. laws. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/faqs Try again, Jwhop. This time with feeling!
IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 6981 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 28, 2014 08:46 AM
"I don't think you're convincing anyone; certainly not a person that knows the intelligence community was scrutinizing his every move"...acousticYOU don't know any such thing acoustic. You're bloviating again or more accurately STILL. Intelligence agencies have no powers to prosecute anyone. The FBI has no power to prosecute anyone...for treason or anything else. Federal crimes are prosecuted by the US Justice Dept. Got that irrelevant one? Your little whacko leftist icon committed treason against the United States. The fact he wasn't prosecuted doesn't mean he didn't. Got that irrelevant one? Another little leftist twit committed treason against the United States...and more recently. His name is John Walker Lindh. He was caught making war against the United States in Afghanistan. Another crime defined by the Constitution. Lindh was not charged with treason. Lindh was not prosecuted by any intelligence agency, not prosecuted by the FBI. He was prosecuted by the US Justice Dept, the federal agency which prosecutes federal crimes. You're still meeting my every expectation for you acoustic. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8529 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 28, 2014 01:22 PM
What's wrong, Jwhop. Was it too much for you that I knew what I was talking about? quote: YOU don't know any such thing acoustic. You're bloviating again or more accurately STILL. Intelligence agencies have no powers to prosecute anyone.The FBI has no power to prosecute anyone...for treason or anything else. Federal crimes are prosecuted by the US Justice Dept. Got that irrelevant one?
Classic. Trying to create a hair to split in order to save face. I love it. Yes, the FBI, like any law enforcement agency, must work through the system. However, they most certainly have jurisdiction to arrest a person for committing the crime of treason. In fact, they are the best agency to pursue such an action against an individual. quote: Another little leftist twit committed treason against the United States...and more recently. His name is John Walker Lindh. He was caught making war against the United States in Afghanistan. Another crime defined by the Constitution. Lindh was not charged with treason. Lindh was not prosecuted by any intelligence agency, not prosecuted by the FBI. He was prosecuted by the US Justice Dept, the federal agency which prosecutes federal crimes.
The FBI belongs to the Department of Justice. The FBI interrogated Lindh before handing him over to prosecution. Any questions? If you're having trouble, the line was President ->DoJ ->FBI ->Kerry. Understand? IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 6981 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 28, 2014 04:07 PM
Listen dense one.The FBI would not arrest anyone for treason or any other major crime...without an arrest warrant issued by a federal judge, applied for by a Justice Dept attorney OR pursuant to a criminal indictment by a grand jury presided over by a Justice Dept prosecutor. The FBI is just the investigative arm and the arresting agent. The Justice Dept calls the shots on whom will be arrested and prosecuted and for what charge. This is not rocket science acoustic. Why don't you know this. Average citizens of the US know this. The FBI is not a criminal prosecuting agency. John Traitor Kerry committed treason against the United States according to Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 of the US Constitution. “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them...John Walker Lindh, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort..John Traitor Kerry....." You prattle like a school girl acoustic. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8529 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 28, 2014 06:22 PM
You are very basically attempting to get off on a technicality, and you're still wrong. 18 U.S.C. § 3052 : US Code - Section 3052: Powers of Federal Bureau of Investigation
The Director, Associate Director, Assistant to the Director, Assistant Directors, inspectors, and agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the Department of Justice may carry firearms, serve warrants and subpoenas issued under the authority of the United States and make arrests without warrant for any offense against the United States committed in their presence, or for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing such felony. - See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/II/203/3052#sthash.9dk2PyPT.dpuf I don't think it's me that prattles, dear Jwhop. You've been pursuing this flawed line of thinking for four posts despite having been wrong from the start. I know, in the last few you tried a bit of hair-splitting to improve your odds, but you were still intractably wrong. IP: Logged | |