Author
|
Topic: Current IPCC Scientist Refutes That Global Warming Has Effect On Jet Stream
|
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 02, 2014 09:38 AM
I find it interesting that the IPCC relies on an irrefutable hypothesis to make excuses as to why there is no warming. It's hidden deep inside the ocean--where it can never be measured. How convenient.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 02, 2014 10:10 AM
Only 40 percent of manmade CO2 is able to be absorbed by natural means? Then why higher CO2 but no warming? You can't make that statement and then talk about the oceans in the same breath. The ocean isn't natural? There must be a natural mechanism to deal with CO2, manmade or not, or else we would not be seeing this absence of warming.IP: Logged |
Sibyl Knowflake Posts: 319 From: Uranus Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted March 02, 2014 11:34 AM
Again if you would just actually READ the IPCC report you would see that they have gathered data from all scientists in the field and the ones that believe that global warming is not caused by humans are extremely far and few in between. If you want to feel better about yourself by living in denial, please do. But don't try to lay this idiocy on the rest of us. As I said in the other thread the IPCC concludes that global warming is HAPPENING NOW and it is MAN MADE. Sure other stuff can impact and the earth has naturally been through cycles and all that stuff; but NOTHING compared to what we are experiencing now. The developments we are seeing would take the earth several thousands of years to do on its own. Saying that global warming is happening and is because of humans is not an opinion. It is a statement of fact. I would know. I've spent the last 5 years studying this stuff. I really wish people wouldn't be so lazy and ignorant. Maybe then we could actually do something about it. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 02, 2014 12:37 PM
No warming for almost two decades. Why such an alarmist attitude?IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8579 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 02, 2014 12:58 PM
quote: It's hidden deep inside the ocean--where it can never be measured. How convenient.
That's stupid. I just posted for you how it IS measured. Nothing convenient about it. quote: There must be a natural mechanism to deal with CO2, manmade or not, or else we would not be seeing this absence of warming.
There's not an absence of warming. Number one, there's no recession in the temperatures we've warmed to, and number two, the ocean is now taking the brunt of the warming (as evidenced by ice melt and rising oceans). quote: If you want to feel better about yourself by living in denial, please do. But don't try to lay this idiocy on the rest of us.
Exactly IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 02, 2014 01:40 PM
You've been duped. Many thousands of scientists have not fallen for this manufactured "consensus." Stop believing what the IPCC tells you and unquestioningly taking it as gospel, and expand your awareness. Check out the link below: http://www.petitionproject.org/ IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 02, 2014 01:48 PM
There's no recession in temps. But there has been no increase in temps either--not for years. Is that correct, AG?IP: Logged |
Sibyl Knowflake Posts: 319 From: Uranus Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted March 02, 2014 02:05 PM
quote: Originally posted by Randall: You've been duped. Many thousands of scientists have not fallen for this manufactured "consensus." Stop believing what the IPCC tells you and unquestioningly taking it as gospel, and expand your awareness. Check out the link below: http://www.petitionproject.org/
I'm not taking what they are saying unquestioningly Randall. As I said, I've been studying this at University but I'm not going to go through all my sources and post them here. Most (just about all) scientists accept the IPCCs conclusions because of their thorough and widely accepted research methods. They are not politicians and don't cater to motivated reasoning. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 02, 2014 06:45 PM
The IPCC is a UN organization. Scientists, they may be...but politics are the motivation. Just because something is taught at a university or found in a textbook doesn't make it true. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8579 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 03, 2014 01:05 PM
Sibyl is right.Petition project isn't a scientific endeavor. It proves nothing. Further, there is no "manufactured" consensus. There is only consensus, which is real and measured as we've discussed several times. quote: There's no recession in temps. But there has been no increase in temps either--not for years. Is that correct, AG?
There has been a variable temperature plateau, yes. I don't know why you're asking. We've been over this. quote: The IPCC is a UN organization. Scientists, they may be...but politics are the motivation. Just because something is taught at a university or found in a textbook doesn't make it true.
A lack of real evidence to the contrary suggests that it is. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 03, 2014 03:55 PM
I ask for the sake of our newbie, whom you praise, yet you don't see her denials regarding the pause. Selective reading? IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8579 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 03, 2014 04:09 PM
Some people don't consider it a pause, because the measured temps aren't very far out of line with the trend line. But, this is interesting: Sun-dimming volcanoes partly explain global warming hiatus-study BY ALISTER DOYLE, ENVIRONMENT CORRESPONDENT OSLO Sun Feb 23, 2014 1:06pm EST (Reuters) - Small volcanic eruptions help explain a hiatus in global warming this century by dimming sunlight and offsetting a rise in emissions of heat-trapping gases to record highs, a study showed on Sunday. Eruptions of at least 17 volcanoes since 2000, including Nabro in Eritrea, Kasatochi in Alaska and Merapi in Indonesia, ejected sulfur whose sun-blocking effect had been largely ignored until now by climate scientists, it said. The pace of rising world surface temperatures has slowed since an exceptionally warm 1998, heartening those who doubt that an urgent, trillion-dollar shift to renewable energies from fossil fuels is needed to counter global warming. Explaining the hiatus could bolster support for a U.N. climate deal, due to be agreed by almost 200 governments at a summit in Paris in late 2015 to avert ever more floods, droughts, heatwaves and rising sea levels. "This is a complex detective story," said Benjamin Santer of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, lead author of the study in the journal Nature Geoscience that gives the most detailed account yet of the cooling impact of volcanoes. "Volcanoes are part of the answer but there's no factor that is solely responsible for the hiatus," he told Reuters of the study by a team of U.S. and Canadian experts. Volcanoes are a wild card for climate change - they cannot be predicted and big eruptions, most recently of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991, can dim global sunshine for years. Santer said other factors such as a decline in the sun's output, linked to a natural cycle of sunspots, or rising Chinese emissions of sun-blocking pollution could also help explain the recent slowdown in warming. The study suggested that volcanoes accounted for up to 15 percent of the difference between predicted and observed warming this century. All things being equal, temperatures should rise because greenhouse gas emissions have hit repeated highs. TEMPORARY RESPITE "Volcanoes give us only a temporary respite from the relentless warming pressure of continued increases in carbon dioxide," said Piers Forster, Professor of Climate Change at the University of Leeds. A study by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change last year suggested that natural variations in the climate, such as an extra uptake of heat by the oceans, could help explain the warming slowdown at the planet's surface. The IPCC projected a resumption of warming in coming years and said that "substantial and sustained" cuts in greenhouse gas emissions were needed to counter climate change. It also raised the probability that human activities were the main cause of warming since 1950 to at least 95 percent from 90 in 2007. Despite the hiatus, temperatures have continued to rise - 13 of the 14 warmest years on record have been this century, according to the World Meteorological Organisation. For the study, click on: dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2098 IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 03, 2014 04:47 PM
It's a pause, because there has been no appreciable warming for 17.5 years. Volcanoes cause cooling if in large number, but generally, they can't be behind a pause, because they spew out a lot of CO2.IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8579 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 03, 2014 05:43 PM
I think it's saying that actual pollution, sulfur in the air from volcanoes as well as industry, is blocking some radiation from the Sun.IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 1436 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted March 03, 2014 06:53 PM
The article i posted about China talks about the"nuclear winter"effect of extreme pollution...dimming the sunlight enough to damage crop growth...nor to mention the lung and other diseases the Chinese are suffering. Part of the "natural" check&balance of CO2 is vehetation, like the rainforests andothers which we are decimating, mountaintop mining is another nasty one. Fossil fuels have got to go for soooo many reasons...or at least be relegated toreasonable limits. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 03, 2014 07:08 PM
Interesting as to how the alarmists include the sun in their analyses when it suits them.The nuclear winter hypothesis was based upon a flawed computer model. I've posted quite a bit on it here in the past. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 03, 2014 07:24 PM
Despite the hiatus, temps have continued to rise? Doesn't the very definition of a hiatus mean there is no rise?IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8579 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2014 12:08 PM
I keep answering this question for you. The "hiatus" would be surface temperatures. The continued warming would be the ocean temperatures. quote: Interesting as to how the alarmists include the sun in their analyses when it suits them.
Climate scientists have always included the Sun. You're making up a false narrative here. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2014 12:11 PM
The hottest years are surface temps, are they not?IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8579 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2014 12:20 PM
Yes.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2014 01:09 PM
Then how can there be a pause in surface warming for 17.5 years and still have years that are the warmest on record?IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8579 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2014 02:58 PM
The temperature doesn't recede from its high. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2014 03:36 PM
You have multiple record highs within that same 17 year period of no rising temps. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 8579 From: Dublin, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2014 04:33 PM
Right.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 38250 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2014 05:13 PM
How is that possible? Am I missing something? If there has been no increase in temps, how can there be surface temp record highs? Once you have two (or more) such records within that 17-year pause period, is that not an impossibility? If not, why not? IP: Logged |