posted July 28, 2014 08:49 AM            

"Americans are so down on President Obama at the moment that, if they could do the 2012 election all over again, they'd overwhelmingly back the former Massachusetts governor's bid.

That's just one finding in a brutal CNN poll, released Sunday, which shows Romney topping Obama in a re-election rematch by a whopping nine-point margin, 53 percent to 44 percent.

That's an even larger spread than CNN found in November, when a survey had Romney winning a redo 49 percent to 45 percent."

posted July 29, 2014 11:17 AM            

Let's see, John "Traitor" Kerry ran for prez in 2004...and got his ass kicked by Bush.

On what planet did the former Vice President run for President in 2007?

Memo to the O'Bomber Kool-Aid drinkers:

Your little Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber is so bad as president he wouldn't make a pimple on the ass of George W Bush....or even a mediocre US President. He is the undisputed worst president in the last 70 years and if the question were asked....who is the worst president in US history, the Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber would win...hands down!

I know this really stings Kool-Aid drinkers but George W Bush has higher favorability ratings than the Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber.

posted July 29, 2014 05:02 PM            

quote:

---

Let's see, John "Traitor" Kerry ran for prez in 2004...and got his ass kicked by Bush.

On what planet did the former Vice President run for President in 2007?

Memo to the O'Bomber Kool-Aid drinkers:

Your little Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber is so bad as president he wouldn't make a pimple on the ass of George W Bush....or even a mediocre US President. He is the undisputed worst president in the last 70 years and if the question were asked....who is the worst president in US history, the Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber would win...hands down!

I know this really stings Kool-Aid drinkers but George W Bush has higher favorability ratings than the Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber.

As for Romney, he wasn't my guy but I voted for him over the Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber. I would have voted for Daffy Duck over O'Bomber. Daffy Duck is more rational than the Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber who is pure, unadulterated LOONY TUNES.[/B]

---

I think I will go ahead and respond to this one 'jwhop' style.

You honky, slacked jawed, right wing out of touchables, beef eater drinkers are bent over the fact land mark legislation has been passed and will be backed up by go old johnny justice again soon enough (numbers easily show people on the program are happy to have) and the dow is hovering around 17,000, unemployment south of 7.0 after your boy W under D ick Darth Vaders direction tanked it into the 6000's and practically 11.0. If it weren't for boners and tea party pink lemonade drinking, richy rich care only about themselves tea party crashers maybe some kind of border protection or legislation that showed you could do anything but admire all of your fat cat personas in the mirror could be passed. Good luck with Crispy Cream Christie, Elizadeath Warren, Book of Mormon, or D ick Hater Perry in 16. Maybe the 'read my lips' 90+er should go for that second term, he stands a better chance than any other circus elephant animals.

Wow that sounded really trashy, low class, pathetic and really took any and all sting out of any legitimate argument I may be presenting on here, I don't think I will try that again..

Hillary 16, see you there. And oh yeah thanks for ignoring and not responding on your other post about the worst group of law makers ever...your right wing congress. I guess when there's nothing to say to back them up or justify their actions better to just shut your mouth and not respond. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go make myself some paradise Punch Kool-Aid.

posted July 31, 2014 11:11 AM            

No, that sounds about right for a drooling O'Bomber Kool-Aid drinking leftist.

The facts remain:

Your little Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber is so bad as president he wouldn't make a pimple on the ass of George W Bush....or even a mediocre US President. He is the undisputed worst president in the last 70 years and if the question were asked....who is the worst president in US history, the Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber would win...hands down!

I know this really stings Kool-Aid drinkers but George W Bush has higher favorability ratings than the Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber

AND....

posted August 02, 2014 10:15 AM            

Sorry, we don't sue people for ignorance in America. Even if it's terminal ignorance.

posted August 04, 2014 01:47 PM            

Yes in times like these the sitting Prez will take a lot of dissatisfaction in his ratings. About the only worse figures are for the current congress who unlike obama are up for re election in November.

posted August 04, 2014 02:10 PM            

Those tax dollars are going for a very good cause...to prevent the Marxist Messiah from further undermining America...domestically and abroad.

Oh yeah...and Mitt Romney would clean the Marxist Messiah's clock if the election were held today.

posted August 06, 2014 09:14 PM            

^^Good one Cat, but as hard as we try people who make up their own reality and choose what to believe and what not to believe live in their own bubble, kind of like punching a brick wall...not worth a persons time.

'Good use of taxpayers money' what a flying f*cking joke, even D*ck Cheney and your own speaker Boenhner said it was off the table and a waste of time (and won't happen anyway). Why don't you go run off to recess all the while acknowledging a humanitarian crisis and doing nothing viable to combat the problem except passing some kind of puppet 1/4 effort bill that doesn't provide enough funding and attempts to rollback that Obama immigration law passed in 08...oh yeah that was your boy W that passed that one, not the present who led the country out of the worst economy since the 30's, slashed unemployment by multiple % points and led the DOW back from the W days of 6000 to recently 17,000, the stuff that really matters in America.

Funny how multiple right wingers go on record saying Obama isn't using enough of his own power to combat the immigration problem...hello isn't that the same reason tea partiers and others in the party want to Waste taxpayer money and sue in the first place? What's next, we want to invade Russia and start up those Haliburton blank checks again, no guessing there, they do have WMD? What happen to the Iraq criticism dominating right wingers agendas that just disappeared into the mist from weeks back. Desperate measures for desperate times...

posted August 07, 2014 09:19 AM            

None of the distractions leftists are attempting to trot out to confuse issues are going to work. You can screech and shriek about providing birth control for Sandra Fluke and all the wannabe Sandra Flukes; you can screech and howl about a war on women, social justice and all the other leftist talking points. Americans aren't listening to you, aren't listening to Nancy Pee-Lousy, aren't listening to Hairy Reid and aren't listening to the Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber.

Here's a clue for you clueless O'Bomber Kool-Aid drinkers.

IT'S THE ECONOMY STUPID!

The Insiders: The Democrats want a smokescreen to hide the economy
Ed Rogers
August 4

With the frightening calamities overseas growing with menacing momentum and all the shallow and cynical talk about gridlock and impeachment here at home, it is easy to get distracted from what will really matter to voters less than 100 days from now, when they go to the polls for the 2014 midterm elections.

There is no chance the economy will be strong by November, even if we see some improvements between now and then. The real questions are how weak it will still be and to what degree voters will want to send a message that they are unhappy with the Democrats’ stewardship of the economy.

Obama apologists will point to the most recent quarter of gross domestic product growth as evidence that the economy is improving. Well, even the boost from this one quarter of good growth under President Obama – which is still subject to revision – means that GDP growth for the year is now an anemic 0.9 percent.

One lesson to derive from the Obama administration is that not all growth represents good policy. To achieve the paltry growth we have seen in the past five years, Obama has resorted to economic steroids in the form of federal bond-buying programs and worse, economic meth in the form of debt. Obama has increased our country’s debt by more than any other president in history. Think about that. Since he was first elected, Obama has overspent by more than $1 trillion per year (on average), resulting in a total of $7.1 trillion added to the national debt under his watch so far.

In other words, thus far the Obama administration has added over $61,000 per American household to our national debt.

In a campaign, it is difficult to talk about abstract “trillion dollar deficits” and dollars per household, but there is an easy question Republican candidates should pose to voters. They should ask, “Do you think you’re getting your money’s worth from the government?” That is, do voters feel that the extra $61,000 the Obama administration has spent above and beyond the federal budget has resulted in additional, tangible benefits for their families?

These numbers are so frightening it’s no wonder the Democrats want to talk about anything else. And if they are backed into a corner, they inevitably resort to blaming President George W. Bush. But at some point, Democrats will be forced to admit that the colossal Obama debt makes the debt added under Bush look tiny.

Here are the facts:

From 1776 to 2001, we accumulated approximately $5.7 trillion in debt. During the eight years of George W. Bush’s presidency, the debt increased by about $4.9 trillion to $10.7 trillion. Under Obama so far, the debt has escalated by over $7 trillion to $17.7 trillion.

The Democrats’ overspending is indefensible, so they mostly don’t even try to defend it. Instead, they change the subject – or worse, they suggest our increasing debt is not a problem. This is worse than irresponsible; it is sinister to try to convince voters that the bills won’t ever have to be paid and that future generations won’t pay a price for the debt we are incurring.

Democrats would have you believe that the top issues for voters ahead of the midterm elections are global warming and social issues, such as abortion. But recent Gallup polling makes plain that economic issues are No. 1 in voters’ minds. In a poll from July 7-10, 2014, 41 percent of voters said they believe our net economic problems are “the most important problem facing this country today.” Among the non-economic problems facing our country, the environment/pollution is seventeenth on the list, with less than one percent of voters listing it as the most important issue. And, oh by the way, abortion is 25th on that list. So in fact, Democrats are speaking to a very narrow audience.