Author
|
Topic: American Election: A Scorpian / Pluto sun woman, or a Gemini / Mercurial man ?
|
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 68269 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:09 PM
Juni I have additional sources which say the same thing. I have provided them for you, per your request, my Friend ------------------ Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE. http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 68269 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:11 PM
The issue of whether we should stop Muslim immigration into America has become a contentious one, but knowing how many Muslim Americans already want sharia law in the United States just might make up your mind about it. According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”
Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/youll-be-shocked-with-how- many-american-muslims-want-sharia-law/#ixzz4GE9ZzzNm ------------------ Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.
http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 68269 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:12 PM
Two more sources, Juni.Nice to have a respectful and meaningful dialogue with you, too and take care! Shock Poll: 51% of U.S. Muslims Want Sharia; 25% Okay with Violence Against Americans http://www.breitbart.com/national- security/2015/06/24/shock-poll-51-of-american-muslims-want-sharia-25-okay-with-violence-against-americans/
Poll: Most U.S. Muslims would trade Constitution for Shariah Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/poll-most-u-s-muslims-would-trade-constitution-for-shariah/#QrTGogcE38BPCbJF.99 ------------------ Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.
http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 68269 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:15 PM
Back to HilaryIt is sooo obvious that she is guilty of a plethora of crimes. Where is the genuine concern and anger over this?
------------------ Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE. http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 980 From: right by vancouver, bc, canada Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:17 PM
The Center for Security Policy conducted those "The Center for Security Policy (CSP) is a "not very highly respected"[1] Washington, D.C.-based national security think tank that has been widely accused of engaging in conspiracy theorizing by a range of individuals, media outlets and organizations. Its activities are focused on exposing and researching perceived jihadist threats to the United States. The Center has been described as "disreputable" by Salon and the Southern Poverty Law Center designated the CSP as a hate group in 2016." -wiki IP: Logged |
bluestskies88 Knowflake Posts: 521 From: Registered: May 2011
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:21 PM
lol Ami. what are those media outlets you are sharing? looks like a conservative bias, BS conspiracy theories blogs. IP: Logged |
bluestskies88 Knowflake Posts: 521 From: Registered: May 2011
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:22 PM
quote: Originally posted by soren: The Center for Security Policy conducted those "The Center for Security Policy (CSP) is a "not very highly respected"[1] Washington, D.C.-based national security think tank that has been widely accused of engaging in conspiracy theorizing by a range of individuals, media outlets and organizations. Its activities are focused on exposing and researching perceived jihadist threats to the United States. The Center has been described as "disreputable" by Salon and the Southern Poverty Law Center designated the CSP as a hate group in 2016." -wiki
ah yeah soren, you beat me to it!
IP: Logged |
bluestskies88 Knowflake Posts: 521 From: Registered: May 2011
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:26 PM
quote: Originally posted by Randall: I never said Hillary lied to the FBI. She lied to all of us. She told the FBI the truth, because to lie to a federal agent is a felony. But all of her public statements were lies, which she starkly contradicted when speaking to the FBI. Perhaps, she learned much from when her husband committed perjury and was almost impeached.
huh? how can she lie to us and not lie to the fbi? i am very curious where your thought of logic, rational thinking came to this presumption? btw, i showed you in bullet points which facts the FBI found in Hillary's email servers .. point by point. i guess still not getting it huh? IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 69076 From: Saturn next to Charmaine Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:35 PM
In several public instances she denied the allegations. But when speaking with the director, she told the truth. Hence, she did not lie to the FBI, but she lied to everyone else, in particular, denying all of the allegations. What is so difficult to understand about that? Here is the director confirming several things she lied about. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=opPh9uG29cQ IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 69076 From: Saturn next to Charmaine Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:44 PM
Hillary denied everything. In every public questioning about the emails since the scandal broke, she lied. But when questioned by the FBI, she did not lie.IP: Logged |
bluestskies88 Knowflake Posts: 521 From: Registered: May 2011
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:44 PM
quote: Originally posted by Randall: In several public instances she denied the allegations. But when speaking with the director, she told the truth. Hence, she did not lie to the FBI, but she lied to everyone else, in particular, denying all of the allegations. What is so difficult to understand about that? Here is the director confirming several things she lied about. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=opPh9uG29cQ
yes randall. i heard and aware of what the director said. i also expressed my rational points to you earlier today in a few responses on pages 10-11. it's hard to follow you because your perspectives are not rational at all...you just consistently accuse her of lying, like she killed or stole from you or something. it's very personal to you lol if you missed, here it is again. i added / the last couple of sentences as marked. this is only regarding her email scandal. i cannot 100% say Hillary never lied on other things. And if she did, who cares? have you not lied in all of you life? Trump? Obama? Bush?? ETC ETC the point is, why does people keep constantly accuse her of being a liar. all these anger projected onto her? just because comey said she sent and received classified emails... you and the Trump supporters / conservatives quickly jump and says AHA, SHE LIED. when it CLEARLY is explain WHAT THOSE CLASSIFIED EMAILS ARE! They were incorrectly labeled. LOL it's like taking a quote of something, and not reading the WHOLE STORY and calling it a FACT/TRUTH! posted August 02, 2016 01:35 PM Click Here to See the Profile for bluestskies88 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote quote:Originally posted by Randall: No, read your own quote. Or listen to the video you posted. Yes, 8 were of the lowest classified, AND another 8 were top secret at the time they were sent. The 3 you reference were of those that were not produced to State. lmao.. those 8 are not individual emails, but chains! yes, they contained top secret / classified information, but those 8 email CHAINS were NOT marked classified (had no classified markings on them) EDIT: 7:15pm EST the only classified emails in question here are those 3 incorrectly marked emails. which i highlighted to you on my previous post. here is a quote from the house oversight committee and from director comey: the July 7 House Oversight Committee hearing shows, Comey was asked by Rep. Trey Gowdy whether it was true, as Clinton said, that there was “nothing marked classified” in her emails. Comey responded, “That’s not true.” He went on to say that “there were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents.” In that hearing, Comey also said that those three emails weren’t properly marked and could have been missed by Clinton. State Department spokesman John Kirby said in press briefings on July 6 and 7 that the department believes two of the emails were wrongly marked as confidential. Kirby said that the emails were “call sheets” — information to be used when talking to foreign leaders — and a portion of those are marked as “confidential” until a secretary of state decides whether or not to call the leaders in question. Kirby said that it appears Clinton had made the decision to place those two calls, so the “confidential” markings should have been removed. SO, the point here is. Did Hillary lie when she said: "there was nothing marked classified in my emails either sent or receive"? No, she didn't lie... because of the FACT most of those emails were either NOT marked classified or incorrectly marked classified. the FBI could not find an INTENT that she sent classified emails. Yes, she was and i quote the director 'careless' in handling her email server. That's it. Period. End of story. Let's sing KUMBAYA. Let.it.Go. If you and or anyone else REALLY want to see the facts, and the concise explanations from Director Comey as to how he came to the conclusion to not prosecute Hillary Clinton. Watch the 6 hours hearing committee here: http://www.c-span.org/video/?412315-1/fbi-director-james-comey- testifies-hillary-clinton-email-probe&start=1420 I wanted to see and hear for myself, and totally get a clear understanding with proven facts. so I took my time to watch all 6 hours (when i had the time) because I am not one to ASSUME and blame people. I want my facts straight, and real. I value not coming to the conclusion and accusing a person a liar so lightly, without the facts. it's much easier to not jump to conclusion and not disassociate from what's real.
IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 980 From: right by vancouver, bc, canada Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:51 PM
"Hillary Clinton is sticking to her story. The Democratic presidential nominee Sunday repeated her claim that she never sent or received classified information on her private email as secretary of state, directly contradicting what FBI Director James B. Comey said the agency found in its investigation. “I was communicating with over 300 people in my emails. They certainly did not believe and had no reason to believe what they were sending was classified,” Mrs. Clinton said on “Fox News Sunday.” “I take classification seriously,” she said, repeating her frequent assertion that she made a mistake in using a private email account hosted on a private server kept at her home in Chappaqua, New York. On July 5, Mr. Comey said 110 of Mrs. Clinton’s email messages contained information that was classified at the time she sent or received them, and a small number of them included markings that identified them as classified."So she unintendedly sent 110 classified, but intentionally sent 3 that she marked as classified. Even if those 3 weren't actually considered classified, she thought they were and sent them. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 69076 From: Saturn next to Charmaine Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:52 PM
You asked me how can she lie to us and not the FBI. I was trying to respond to your query. Do you now understand how Hillary lied to us yet told the truth to the FBI?IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 69076 From: Saturn next to Charmaine Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:54 PM
Wow, she must think the public are total idiots! Here is director confirming she lied: http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=opPh9uG29cQ IP: Logged |
bluestskies88 Knowflake Posts: 521 From: Registered: May 2011
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:54 PM
quote: Originally posted by Randall: You asked me how can she lie to us and not the FBI. I was trying to respond to your query. Do you now understand how Hillary lied to us yet told the truth to the FBI?
to be fair yes, some of the things she lied and was proven by comey. example, when she said she only used one server, when in fact there were numbers of others used. but i seriously don't think she intently and purposely lied about sharing classified informations!! lol
IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 68269 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:55 PM
How ANYONE can defend Hilary leaves me dumbfounded! ------------------ Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE. http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
bluestskies88 Knowflake Posts: 521 From: Registered: May 2011
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:57 PM
quote: Originally posted by soren: "Hillary Clinton is sticking to her story. The Democratic presidential nominee Sunday repeated her claim that she never sent or received classified information on her private email as secretary of state, directly contradicting what FBI Director James B. Comey said the agency found in its investigation. “I was communicating with over 300 people in my emails. They certainly did not believe and had no reason to believe what they were sending was classified,” Mrs. Clinton said on “Fox News Sunday.” “I take classification seriously,” she said, repeating her frequent assertion that she made a mistake in using a private email account hosted on a private server kept at her home in Chappaqua, New York. On July 5, Mr. Comey said 110 of Mrs. Clinton’s email messages contained information that was classified at the time she sent or received them, and a small number of them included markings that identified them as classified."So she unintendedly sent 110 classified, but intentionally sent 3 that she marked as classified. Even if those 3 weren't actually considered classified, she thought they were and sent them.
for clarity's sake--- lol no those 3 were not sent, but found by the FBI. they probably were not sent because those 3 were marked incorrectly. IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 68269 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:58 PM
quote: Originally posted by Randall: Wow, she must think the public are total idiots! Here is director confirming she lied: http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=opPh9uG29cQ
She has no respect for the people
------------------ Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.
http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 980 From: right by vancouver, bc, canada Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 02, 2016 09:58 PM
It's not like she had malicious intentions as far as I can see. She was just doing her business. IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 980 From: right by vancouver, bc, canada Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 02, 2016 10:00 PM
quote: Originally posted by bluestskies88: for clarity's sake---lol no those 3 were not sent, but found by the FBI. they probably were not sent because those 3 were marked incorrectly.
what do you mean they weren't sent? so they were saved as draft? IP: Logged |
bluestskies88 Knowflake Posts: 521 From: Registered: May 2011
|
posted August 02, 2016 10:01 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ami Anne:
How ANYONE can defend Hilary leaves me dumbfounded!
yeah, dumb-founded literally it's not being idiotic to look further from assumptions. looking pass an emotional reaction, and sticking to the facts. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 69076 From: Saturn next to Charmaine Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 02, 2016 10:02 PM
To clarify, whether top secret, secret, or confidential, State Dept business should not have been on a public server. That was grossly negligent and a violation of the law. IP: Logged |
bluestskies88 Knowflake Posts: 521 From: Registered: May 2011
|
posted August 02, 2016 10:04 PM
quote: Originally posted by soren: what do you mean they weren't sent? so they were saved as draft?
no, not as draft. not sent to the State department when they asked Hillary to transfer all her emails to them for investigaton.
IP: Logged |
bluestskies88 Knowflake Posts: 521 From: Registered: May 2011
|
posted August 02, 2016 10:05 PM
quote: Originally posted by Randall: To clarify, whether top secret, secret, or confidential, State Dept business should not have been on a public server. That was grossly negligent and a violation of the law.
OH WELL! the FBI did not find her to be a criminal. Tough luck! LIFE GOES ON!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_b5cyt89NGg
IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 980 From: right by vancouver, bc, canada Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 02, 2016 10:05 PM
so the state department wasn't allowed to have access to them because they were marked classified? IP: Logged |