posted August 28, 2016 04:24 PM            

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/07/usa-today-trumps-involvement-3500-legal-actions-30-years-unprecedented/

And "our" news source:

posted September 02, 2016 05:16 PM            

quote:

---

However, even by those measures, the number of cases in which Trump is involved is extraordinary. For comparison, USA TODAY analyzed the legal involvement for five top real-estate business executives: Edward DeBartolo, shopping-center developer and former San Francisco 49ers owner; Donald Bren, Irvine Company chairman and owner; Stephen Ross, Time Warner Center developer; Sam Zell, Chicago real-estate magnate; and Larry Silverstein, a New York developer famous for his involvement in the World Trade Center properties.

To maintain an apples-to-apples comparison, only actions that used the developers’ names were included. The analysis found Trump has been involved in more legal skirmishes than all five of the others — combined.

---

Yet, supporters will have an explaination for about 3,495 of them

posted September 03, 2016 12:04 PM            

Yes, we do but we're not going to tell you what those explanations are!

Instead, we're going to refer you to the list of pending and settled lawsuits against:

posted September 12, 2016 09:53 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
"Yet, supporters will have an explaination for about 3,495 of them"

Yes, we do but we're not going to tell you what those explanations are!

---

Maybe because they're nonexistent?

Btw consumers purchasing products from those companies have nothing to do with the lawsuits. Having been involved in that many lawsuits, he's a liability to this country. It's his default position when things don't go his way.

posted September 13, 2016 11:03 AM            

Surely, you must be either joking or you don't get out much.

10 Ridiculously Frivolous Lawsuits Against Big Businesses
Staff Writer

posted September 13, 2016 08:04 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
And what will Hillary do? Pay for play.

---

Show me one piece of evidence that she's been involved in even HALF that number of lawsuits. Seriously, I want to see it.

posted September 13, 2016 08:09 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
Nonexistent?

Surely, you must be either joking or you don't get out much.

[b]10 Ridiculously Frivolous Lawsuits Against Big Businesses
Staff Writer

1. Liebeck v. McDonald's
2. Overton v. Anheuser-Busch
3. Norman v. Honda
4. Aitken v. NBC
5. Peters v. Universal Studios
6. Chiscolm v. Bank of America
7. Rosenberg v. Google
8. Roller v. Blaine & Copperfield
9. PETA v. Division of Fish and Wildlife
10. Kellogg v. Exxon
http://www.businessinsurance.org/10-ridiculously-frivolous-lawsuits-against-big-bus inesses/ [/B]

---

I was referring to your rationalization for the many lawsuits involving Trump. I'm well aware of the fact that frivolous lawsuits occur between big companies, but we're not talking about big companies here. We're talking about Trump and his liability as a president.

posted September 14, 2016 08:25 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
Trump won't have any civil liability as President of the United States.

---

Another valid reason he is not elected.

Impeachment probably takes as much time as a lawsuit anyhow.

posted September 14, 2016 05:09 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by juniperb:
Another valid reason he is not elected.

Impeachment probably takes as much time as a lawsuit anyhow.

---

Unfortunately, it would never happen because he would pay everyone off to keep himself in office.

Besides, we already know that we can't rely on Republican politicians to make sound judgments about their own party or candidate. Under his threats and bribery, nothing would become of a suggestion for impeachment.

posted September 15, 2016 10:46 AM            

Like I said, you don't get out much.
The so called bright lights of the so called Republican party refuse to endorse Trump. They represent the establishment, Globalist, New World Order lunatics.

The truth is that you don't have a clue what's going on in the Republican Party...or the democrat party for that matter.
Millions of democrats, independents and millions more who haven't voted in the last 4 elections are going to vote for Trump.

posted September 15, 2016 01:09 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
Unhinged?

---

posted September 15, 2016 01:42 PM            

Perhaps it's not occurred to you this is a political forum. There will be consequences for interjecting blithering blather into discussions here.

posted September 15, 2016 05:03 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
Yeah, Trump is for the people--not the elitists' aristocracy. And that means that the fringe on both sides of the fence will be against him. Globalism ends with Trump. America first! Hillary wants the same ol', same ol'. And that includes pandering for the African-American vote and doing absolutely nothing to help them like it has been going on for her 30+ years in office. Her and Obama don't even care about their hometown of Chicago. Their axiom is: "Ride by and wave, get the Black vote, leave, and then let them kill each other."

---

I appreciate your reasonable and measured response, Randall.

I still don't care for the fact that his slogan "America First" harkens back to Nazi sympathizers in the 1930s. Hopefully he's unaware of it, because I can't fathom that he would be aware of the connections and continue to use that phrase.

posted September 15, 2016 06:52 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by StubbornVirgo:
I appreciate your reasonable and measured response, Randall.

I still don't care for the fact that his slogan "America First" harkens back to Nazi sympathizers in the 1930s. Hopefully he's unaware of it, because I can't fathom that he would be aware of the connections and continue to use that phrase.

https://www.washingtonpost.co m/posteverything/wp/2016/06/14/donald-trumps-new-favorite-slogan-has-a-nazi-friendly-history/?utm_term=.7159c6249650

---

This article was hysterical.

Comparing a two word slogan to Nazi sympathizers...really? "America First", "Make America Great Again", slogans like these have been used repetitively throughout history. What is this statement trying to imply? That Trump is a Nazi sympathizer? Well then Reagan and Bill Clinton would be too since they too have used the same slogan used 80 something years ago.

quote:

---

"Trump wants his exclusionary America to cower behind walls."

---

A few parts that stood out:

quote:

---

""This is what Trump’s “America First” means: a white America" "

"Lindbergh wasn’t against wars per se; he could support fighting if it came to “a question of banding together to defend the white race against foreign invasion.”"

"— just as Trump would presumably allow Muslims who could pass a perfect and proper screen. "

---

It's disturbing that someone would even compare this to what Trump is ACTUALLY saying. This is in no way about defending the white race. What?? Foreign individuals don't have a 'right' to live here. That's not how it works. There is a system to be followed. No race is excluded in this.

quote:

---

"Then, as now, the phrase offered strength through cowardice. "

---

OK.