posted January 27, 2017 09:45 PM            

And yes, he excluded the Muslim countries where he has hotels and business in his "Muslim ban", right in your face.

Is this constitutional in the US, to persecute a religion and favor another?

I won't even mention, as a baptized Christian myself, that this goes against the message and sacrifice of Christ.

I know this can't last, but I am just very sad today Stay strong!

------------------
I seem to have loved you in numberless forms...

posted January 29, 2017 01:14 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
More nonsense from the left. It doesn't matter where Trump did business. The key is which nations support terrorism. The two are mutually exclusive. These nations that without question support terrorism are: Syria, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen.

---

But it IS a conflict of interest. If this keeps up, the Dems may get congress back in 2018, which would mean Trump could get impeached, and Pence would be president (or Paul Ryan, a known globalist, if Pence gets impeached too). If you don't have a favorable approval rating with independents, the people who vote on ISSUES, you likely won't get elected again, as the people who vote for the other ideology will be against you as well. That's why Clinton was such a successful president... he had a high approval rating with his own party, as well as the independents, because he compromised on certain issues and catered to the middle class rather than the extremists. Bush had a high approval rating throughout his first term, but a low approval rating throughout his second term, when he tried to privatize Social Security and didn't respond quickly to Katrina. Those two things as well as the recession and the Iraq War losing popularity led to Obama getting the presidency. You DON'T want extremism if you want Trump to have a 2nd term, much less finish his first. The independents are what matters, not the voters who only vote for their own party, as you'll have them no matter what.

posted January 29, 2017 03:23 AM            

Trump should have targeted Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait's anachronism and support for ISIS instead of just targeting 5 very weak and poor countries. In Syria, the tormented Yezidis need supprt through immigration.

Iran is fair game, they can deal with this ban, in fact no self-respecting Iranian will ever want to go to the USA as long as Trump is President and I am sure Iranian Americans will plan on moving back to a more enlightened and liberal Iran in the years to come.

Not a single terror attack on US Soil has been committed by citizens of the banned countries. All "Wahabbite" terror brains come from Saudi or Egypt.

Trump should focus more on the economy than waste goodwill by going after this very low hanging fruit. I am hoping he will at least allow those with valid visas to enter for now and create a more rational vetting process in preventing immigrants with criminal records from entering USA.

posted January 29, 2017 04:51 AM            

He's a populist and want to please the people who voted him in. Voters of Trump like Randall can say everything to defend him, but not that he is a wise politician and a world class leader for a world class country, he his a mere voice fir little america. Randall, are you the only supporter of him ? It seems

posted January 29, 2017 05:00 AM            

Have noticed so many in the "Conspiracy Community" support Trump for this sole reason, including enlightened researchers like David Wilcock.

I can guarantee that if Trump passes an executive order that criminalizes LGBTs, Randall will be one of the first to fight that order in Court.

@Pire: I agree with you that Trump has taken the populist route for now but these days it is a winning election strategy worldwide.

posted January 29, 2017 07:26 AM            

Causing destabilization to seize absolute power is a must for any totalitarian.

Pire, I don't know, perhaps those who go to those rally can tell us Maybe IQ frequented them and knows there is no danger.

------------------
I seem to have loved you in numberless forms...

posted January 29, 2017 10:20 AM            

I`ve been thinking that myself. It`s like he is being built up for the fall.

posted January 29, 2017 04:17 PM            

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/08/22/steve-bannon-trum p-s-top-guy-told-me-he-was-a-leninist.html

posted January 29, 2017 05:09 PM            

The actual video is here, min 2 http://video.foxnews.com/v/3179604851001/?#sp=show-clips

Just not the reason people think of when they see Trump as "a savior" who has come to overturn the establishment (eradicate corruption, replace it with something for "the people"). No, it's replacing it with a total, most corrupt oligarchy, and the closest model they are moving towards is Russia now.

The reason they need anarchy is because this is the only way to overthrow a democracy. It works in several steps, first you need to discredit the press, polarize people into two factions, create anarchy in the streets, so that you can call for FBI/police intervention, and ultimately military intervention then dissolve Parliament, other governing organisms, under the pretext that order needs to be established with a new organism, or that only one man can re-establish order (martial law). It's an interesting situation here, since the Republicans are in majority, so it will be interesting how they, along with the Democrats, will react. It has happened countless times around the world, not in the US though. Glad to see US democracy is internalized and civil society is so reactive, I expected that.

I'm sure it won't get that far, don't worry, but I have no doubt at this point that this is the intention.

Trump is indeed extremely easy to manipulate. I would expect to be at least 2-3 factions trying to manipulate him, fighting over power behind the scenes.
Kushner is there too, I am still working on analyzing him, he is a mysterious figure, there are no interviews with him, videos or otherwise, just a few min. Kushner is definitely a mastermind and likely to clash with Bannon at some point. I think Kushner is the one who wrote the speech and masterminded the campaign, so he must approve of all this somehow, since, as family and husband of his fav daughter, it is likely that has more influence on Trump, even over Bannon. Bannon, like Ryan, Pence, Conway, and many others look like people who would be loyal to Trump as long he is riding the wave, and fleeing when the boat is sinking.

In the meantime, while creating and profiting from diversion, I am also sure they are working behind the scenes to expand their control and diminish opposition (restructure power organisms, decrease number of employees, release personnel, eliminate due diligence etc ) to make their power more centralized.

------------------
I seem to have loved you in numberless forms...