Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  There's a law against that

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   There's a law against that
Catalina
Knowflake

Posts: 3874
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013

posted April 03, 2017 02:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Catalina     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Why is this being allowed?

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3110

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 9627
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 03, 2017 03:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here's the answer to your question..though I wonder why it's necessary to point this out to you.

"(c) An individual appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in violation of this section is not entitled to pay, and money may not be paid from the Treasury as pay to an individual so appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced.

IP: Logged

Catalina
Knowflake

Posts: 3874
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013

posted April 03, 2017 08:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Catalina     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Kushner is supposedly not taking a salary.. nor Ivanka.. but who pays for them to travel to meetings etc? Who pays for their office maintenance? I think these waters are very murky. And who gains from business accrued thru their positions?

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 9627
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 04, 2017 11:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
All activity was cleared through the White House Counsel's office.

There's nothing there to whine about.

IP: Logged

Catalina
Knowflake

Posts: 3874
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013

posted April 04, 2017 07:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Catalina     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well that's reassuring innit? I thought Don Boy didn't like losers!

From 1999 to 2008, McGahn was chief counsel for the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC).[4] During the early 2000s, he defended House Majority Leader Tom DeLay for his actions during the controversial 2003 Texas redistricting plan. McGahn also represented DeLay in 2005 during a Federal Election Commission audit of the records of Americans for a Republican Majority, DeLay's political action committee.[5]

In 2005, when DeLay was indicted for funneling campaign contributions into the Texans for a Republican Majority PAC (TRMPAC), McGahn said that "money gets transferred all the time".[6] McGahn also defended DeLay regarding contributions made by Russian oil tycoons to the U.S. Family Network.[7] During McGahn's tenure as in-house counsel for the NRCC, it was investigated by the FBI and its treasurer was convicted of embezzlement.[8]

Following the 2004 elections, McGahn established a legal practice, McGahn & Associates PLLC. He has represented the Koch brothers-funded Freedom Partners.[9]
Wiki

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2017

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a