posted May 15, 2017 01:08 PM            

When unemployment goes down by a tenth of a percent you bow down to DT's prowess.. but as it dropped from crash heights to basically where it is now you howled in protest at how slow it was. Do you understand what momentum is?

No one needs to go back to the little house on the prairie.. tho if some want to how does it hurt you? Let them! New technologies are taking over; we dont need to die in a sea of oil byproducts and coal slag to have the good life.

posted May 30, 2017 10:10 AM            

May 30, 2017
More bad news for warmists: NASA finds no retreat of polar ice
Thomas Lifson

The notion that the polar ice caps would melt and flood coastal cities was always the best marketing tool for the global warming fraud. After all, some people prefer warm weather, and no part of the United States is in the tropics, where heat per se would be the most bothersome. Until humans develop gills, flooded cities would be a write-off.

But the ice caps just didn't get the message, and, as we reported yesterday, the ice caps are just as thick as they were decades ago. Those poor polar bears stranded on small pieces of ice will be just fine.

Now comes data from NASA, the space folks, who, when they are not touting the achievements of Muslim scientists, study climate change. Their data show that the extent, as well as the thickness, of the polar ice caps is unchanged. James Taylor of Forbes reports:

Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth's polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede. ...

Updated NASA satellite data show the polar ice caps remained at approximately their 1979 extent until the middle of the last decade. Beginning in 2005, however, polar ice modestly receded for several years. By 2012, polar sea ice had receded by approximately 10 percent from 1979 measurements. (Total polar ice area – factoring in both sea and land ice – had receded by much less than 10 percent, but alarmists focused on the sea ice loss as "proof" of a global warming crisis.) ...

In late 2012, however, polar ice dramatically rebounded and quickly surpassed the post-1979 average. Ever since, the polar ice caps have been at a greater average extent than the post-1979 mean.

Now, in May 2015, the updated NASA data show polar sea ice is approximately 5 percent above the post-1979 average.

During the modest decline in 2005 through 2012, the media presented a daily barrage of melting ice cap stories. Since the ice caps rebounded – and then some – how have the media reported the issue?

posted May 30, 2017 02:06 PM            

AG summarily dismissed, rebuked and proved all of your claims wrong so many times I lost count. Yet you continue to post "new" evidence to your theories. Continually trying to prove a lost claim.

Global Climate Change deniers have little reasoning powers, or FACTS, period.

Maybe it is just bait for AG to come back and prove you wrong AGAIN. AG is smarter than I am. He will stay gone.

posted June 02, 2017 07:33 AM            

what I believe is in contamination and air poluttion. no matter if climate change is bogus, pollution is not and using the climate change bogus claim to continue contaminating the planet (producing plastic for example or cosmetic with chemicals that poison the waters) would not solve the problem.

posted June 02, 2017 07:35 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Catalina:
I repeat

Why is adding poisons to the atmosphere better than eliminating them from the environment?

---

posted June 02, 2017 07:37 AM            

however, polution is a real problem regardless of climate change being a scam or not...so a green light to polutter companies to continue contaminating the planet is indeed not the way to go...