posted October 24, 2019 01:02 PM            

The White House narrative did not explode with any testimony at House hearings.

No one who has testified has any 1st hand knowledge there was a quid pro quo with aid to Ukraine. NO ONE. All 2nd and third hand conversations with those who also have 2nd and 3rd hand conversations. No one who has testified was in the room when the phone call with Ukraine took place AND their 2nd and 3rd hand sources were not there either. A giant cluster fluk.

posted October 24, 2019 01:51 PM            

There have been 'signs' for a while that he has been "unwittingly" or craftily "wedging" and nudging this nation into a style of government-dictatorship?? {God forbid!}

Maybe, they are afraid of being cast-into his basket of recently named Deplorable-Republicans?

This "collective-behavioral response" at its rawest psychological foundation reveals a fear... of the possible "potential-reprisals" they would suffer in personal-interest of their careers.

Dear "original" Republicans,
We need you. We are a two-party system of government.. that can reach across the aisle.

We need you to re-balance, defend and protect our original form and intention of government.

~ Smell the vodka!!!
# Don't Drink That KoolAid!

posted October 24, 2019 04:15 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by BlueRoamer:
Apparently 12 of them had permission to be in that meeting anyway.

Seems they just wanted to make a childish scene.

---

In America, it's always appropriate to call attention to those denying due process to anyone...let alone the President of the United States.

posted October 25, 2019 12:17 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by BlueRoamer:
Please detail the lack of due process

---

None of these 'due process' provisions are present in the fraudulent Pee-Lousy, Nadler, Schiff hearings. NONE. And they are required 'due process' components for congressional investigative hearings. So says the Supreme Court of the United States.

Due Process rights denied:

Denied the right to see all evidence.

Denied the right to present evidence.

Denied the right to call witnesses.

Denied the right to have counsel present at all hearings.

Denied the right to cross examine all witnesses.

Denied the right to make objections relating to the examination of witnesses.

Denied the right to object to the admissibility of evidence.

Denied the right to respond to evidence and testimony.