Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Georgia Affidavit On Voter Fraud

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Georgia Affidavit On Voter Fraud
Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 134152
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 19, 2020 10:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This concerns the Georgia recount. In Fulton County Atlanta, a poll manager with 20 years of ballot handling experience, Susan Voyles, (Wood v. Raffensberger, November 17, 2020) swears to the following: “Inside the box were stacks of ballots ... one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a difference in the texture of the paper ... there were ... no markings on the ballots to show where they had come from, or where they had been processed ... by my estimate in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for Joseph Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President Donald J. Trump.” Voyles’ testimony is evidentiary. The problem with the recount is that it was just hand recounting ballots without that could have been fraudulent. There is no way to know.

IP: Logged

SecretGeek
Knowflake

Posts: 2715
From: Dallas
Registered: Nov 2013

posted November 19, 2020 10:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SecretGeek     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Have to have a signature and compare signatures.

Plus, they have to be checked against databases to make sure they're alive.

That's why the Democrats were pushing the mail-ins, because neither of those are required.

Whereas in person, it's a little more difficult to enter 5000 votes.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 134152
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 19, 2020 10:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Another one in Cobb County Marietta from the aforementioned case and date follows. A poll watcher (a registered Democrat), Mayra Romero, said that: [H]undreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made ... only observed sections ... in blank ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden ... no corresponding envelopes seem in site ... I believe there was fraud committed in ... the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process.”

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 134152
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 20, 2020 02:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have more to post later today from other states. President Trump was ahead on election night by hundreds of thousands of votes in some states, so the Dems got desperate. They made mistakes. Three Affidavits swear that truckload of ballots showed up with only Biden chosen and no down ballots selected.

IP: Logged

Dhyana
Knowflake

Posts: 1082
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019

posted November 20, 2020 04:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dhyana     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The recount is worthless because they're not checking for signature matches. Just running the same ballots through the system.

The election in Georgia is FUBAR.

IP: Logged

SecretGeek
Knowflake

Posts: 2715
From: Dallas
Registered: Nov 2013

posted November 20, 2020 04:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SecretGeek     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dhyana:
The recount is worthless because they're not checking for signature matches. Just running the same ballots through the system.

The election in Georgia is FUBAR.


Exactly!

That's why Lindsey Graham called the Georgia scammer with witnesses.

IP: Logged

Dhyana
Knowflake

Posts: 1082
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019

posted November 20, 2020 04:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dhyana     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by SecretGeek:
Have to have a signature and compare signatures.

Plus, they have to be checked against databases to make sure they're alive.

That's why the Democrats were pushing the mail-ins, because neither of those are required.

Whereas in person, it's a little more difficult to enter 5000 votes.


By changing the rules, they removed the safeguards against fraud, setting up for the steal.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 134152
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 20, 2020 11:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bump! I’m about to add one that will blow your mind.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 134152
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 20, 2020 11:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
An Affidavit from Steven Miller came in yesterday. Miller is a Yale trained and Princeton trained mathematician scientist. He participated in a project where he reviewed high risk ballots in Pennsylvania. He states under statistical analysis that there were between 80,000 and 100,000 ballots for President Trump that were either not counted or were requested in the name of another person, meaning the person who voted or got the ballot wasn’t the person who requested it. The spread is about 80,000 votes for Biden. This is called “expert testimony.”

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2020

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a