Author
|
Topic: Brave New World
|
shura Knowflake Posts: 2899 From: kamaloka Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted February 25, 2021 10:50 PM
aka A time machine peek into US style socialism circa 2035 http://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/25/fashion/norwegian-wool-coats.html?auth=login -email&login=email This feel good story is chock full of dystopian goodies, just dog whistles galore, but this one is my fav ... Richard Sharp, the chairman of the BBC and a former Goldman Sachs banker, bought two for his sons, now 28 and 26, and invested in the company after he tried on his first coat. “My son who is in New York City wore it all winter, even though he is very antimaterialistic, anticapitalist,” he said. “It is discreet enough.”
IP: Logged |
Chanterelle Knowflake Posts: 609 From: USA Registered: Sep 2020
|
posted February 26, 2021 06:56 AM
🤑🤮 Your quote says it all.IP: Logged |
Chanterelle Knowflake Posts: 609 From: USA Registered: Sep 2020
|
posted February 28, 2021 12:50 PM
Clarifying in a better tone... sorry, this is the kind of thing that exemplifies one of my personal pet peeves regarding the whole movement toward ethical sourcing— when things get overhyped and commodified to that extent, it creates a cultural backlash where, on the other side, it’s all dismissed as elitist... where some cashiers give me dirty looks for buying organic vegetables with food stamps, and some of my neighbors imply that I’m a snob for not buying clothes from WalMart. IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 2899 From: kamaloka Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted February 28, 2021 01:11 PM
several yrs ago I noticed a burgeoning trend among a handful of extreme far left groups of highlighting various domestic agricultural policies of the Nazi party. Generally, most of us associate vegetarianism, organic food, etc with the Left. That was true for a time, but the hippies are no more and the modern Left is driven almost exclusively by urban forces. Hence, their disdain for anything "rural." How to condemn family farmers and healthy living? Well, call it white supremacy ofc!Anyway, here we are .... http://humanities.wustl.edu/features/Corinna-Treitel-Eating-Nature http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-14/natural-food-and-nazis-fascism/10236768 http://www.fastcompany.com/90593995/theres-a-disturbing-nexus-of-orgasupre macistsnic-food-and-white- Interesting huh? Some fine pivoting there. IP: Logged |
Belage Knowflake Posts: 3987 From: USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 28, 2021 01:25 PM
quote: Originally posted by shura: aka A time machine peek into US style socialism circa 2035 http://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/25/fashion/norwegian-wool-coats.html?auth=login -email&login=email This feel good story is chock full of dystopian goodies, just dog whistles galore, but this one is my fav ... Richard Sharp, the chairman of the BBC and a former Goldman Sachs banker, bought two for his sons, now 28 and 26, and invested in the company after he tried on his first coat. “My son who is in New York City wore it all winter, even though he is very antimaterialistic, anticapitalist,” he said. “It is discreet enough.”
I find the coat interesting and I wouldn't mind buying it but that quote is pure BS. IP: Logged |
Chanterelle Knowflake Posts: 609 From: USA Registered: Sep 2020
|
posted February 28, 2021 01:58 PM
Wow, nice lineup! (Referring to Shura’s most recent post — this is what happens when I try to write more than 2 sentences.) I’ve never actually heard the term ‘biopolitics’ before, though I am familiar with the historical background. For contrast, here’s something more along the lines of what most small farmers I know actually believe, regardless of where they land on the political spectrum. “(But) the food chain we have now is not designed to feed people. In line with the modern cure-all—the allegedly free global market—it is designed to produce the maximum amount of cash in the shortest time. Stated thus, our approach to our most important material endeavour seems unbelievably crass—but that is how things are nonetheless. The global free market might be good for some things (perhaps we get better computers and warships that way) but for farming, and hence for humanity as a whole, it is disastrous. The simplistic business rules that may (or may not) apply to other enterprises are fatal to Enlightened Agriculture and so, since we depend on agriculture absolutely, they are proving fatal for us.” http://www.colintudge.com/articles/article12.php IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 17787 From: http://forum.astro.com/cgi/forum.cgi?action=viewprofile;username=u36170365 Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 28, 2021 02:54 PM
quote: Originally posted by shura: several yrs ago I noticed a burgeoning trend among a handful of extreme far left groups of highlighting various domestic agricultural policies of the Nazi party. Generally, most of us associate vegetarianism, organic food, etc with the Left. That was true for a time, but the hippies are no more and the modern Left is driven almost exclusively by urban forces. Hence, their disdain for anything "rural." How to condemn family farmers and healthy living? Well, call it white supremacy ofc!Anyway, here we are .... http://humanities.wustl.edu/features/Corinna-Treitel-Eating-Nature http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-14/natural-food-and-nazis-fascism/10236768 http://www.fastcompany.com/90593995/theres-a-disturbing-nexus-of-orgasupre macistsnic-food-and-white- Interesting huh? Some fine pivoting there.
I don’t know anyone from the left, who has disdain for anything rural. IP: Logged |
BlueRoamer Knowflake Posts: 1072 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 01, 2021 12:00 AM
I think shura is projecting her own sense of inferiority into city dwellers. If there’s disdain it’s not about rural or urban, it’s about anyone dumb enough to fall for a charlatan like trump
IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 2899 From: kamaloka Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted March 02, 2021 01:49 PM
quote: Originally posted by BlueRoamer: I think shura is projecting her own sense of inferiority into city dwellers.
Not sure I understand this bit of pop psychology, BR. Do please clarify. IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 2899 From: kamaloka Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted March 02, 2021 01:52 PM
quote: Originally posted by teasel: I don’t know anyone from the left, who has disdain for anything rural.
We've been over this before, and I've posted multiple links for you so at this point Im going to conclude you are yet again choosing the path of willful ignorance. IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 2899 From: kamaloka Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted March 02, 2021 02:00 PM
quote: Originally posted by Chanterelle: Wow, nice lineup! (Referring to Shura’s most recent post — this is what happens when I try to write more than 2 sentences.) I’ve never actually heard the term ‘biopolitics’ before, though I am familiar with the historical background. For contrast, here’s something more along the lines of what most small farmers I know actually believe, regardless of where they land on the political spectrum. “(But) the food chain we have now is not designed to feed people. In line with the modern cure-all—the allegedly free global market—it is designed to produce the maximum amount of cash in the shortest time. Stated thus, our approach to our most important material endeavour seems unbelievably crass—but that is how things are nonetheless. The global free market might be good for some things (perhaps we get better computers and warships that way) but for farming, and hence for humanity as a whole, it is disastrous. The simplistic business rules that may (or may not) apply to other enterprises are fatal to Enlightened Agriculture and so, since we depend on agriculture absolutely, they are proving fatal for us.” http://www.colintudge.com/articles/article12.php
Good quote and I agree. Could easily be condemned as coming from a position of white privilege tho Seen this? Problem: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/27/farmers-markets-called-racist-habits-of-white-peop/ Solution: http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/beyond-equity-statements-black-food-leaders-building-an-anti-racist-toolkit-for-farmers-markets/
IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 2899 From: kamaloka Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted March 02, 2021 02:02 PM
quote: Originally posted by Belage: I find the coat interesting and I wouldn't mind buying it but that quote is pure BS.
It's lovely and no doubt well made coat. Nearly everything wrong with the world is in that one quote. It's a thing of beauty tbh. IP: Logged |
Chanterelle Knowflake Posts: 609 From: USA Registered: Sep 2020
|
posted March 02, 2021 09:14 PM
quote: Originally posted by shura: Good quote and I agree. Could easily be condemned as coming from a position of white privilege thoSeen this? Problem: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/27/farmers-markets-called-raci st-habits-of-white-peop/ Solution: http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/beyond-equ ity-statements-black-food-leaders-building-an-anti-racist-toolkit-for-farmers-markets/
I don’t even know what to make of that first article... All I can say is, it’s silly to equate “upscale, trendy, and mostly white” with “racist” — there are plenty of farmers’ markets where I wouldn’t feel particularly comfortable either. As for the second link, I’ve gotten sidetracked by this: http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/online-snap-at-markets-on-the-horizon-not-out-of-reach/ I’m too tired to rant about the background, I’ll just cut and paste: “There are still plenty of barriers we face as a market community to consider before we implement online SNAP. The most notable barrier is that at present, there is no technology available to allow for online SNAP processing by farmers markets or farmers. And even if we did have technology, there are only a dozen grocery retailers that are approved as part of the USDA pilot and allowed to process SNAP online legally — Walmart, Amazon, and a few others. This FNS approval isn’t as simple as having the technology and filling out a form; we have not yet seen any indication that FNS will enable farmers markets to serve as the online SNAP processors on behalf of farmers due to the way the law is written. From a legal perspective, USDA and FNS require online SNAP-EBT approved retailers to own inventory of products, meaning they have to purchase and physically possess products (like a grocery store does) before reselling to a customer. The legislative criteria of owning inventory immediately excludes most farmers market organizations, which in most cases don’t own the products themselves; they organize the marketplace, made up of vendors who own their own products.”
IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 139044 From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate. Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 02, 2021 10:18 PM
Online SNAP has all kinds of issues even with Walmart and Amazon. There are issues, because the SNAP recipients are required to input a PIN to use SNAP. Also, SNAP doesn’t reimburse for service fees and delivery/shipping charges, so that can artificially inflate prices in some cases. However, farmers’ markets can accept SNAP, can receive the EBT equipment at no charge, and can offer a Double Up Your Bucks program, which offers $2 for every $1 spent, up to $20 spent per day.
IP: Logged |
Chanterelle Knowflake Posts: 609 From: USA Registered: Sep 2020
|
posted March 04, 2021 06:19 AM
I should have said, “I’m too tired to explain the background without ranting.” Anyway, if you look back at the history of the SNAP program:The first Food Stamp Program (1939-1943): “An effort to manage agricultural surpluses, the first food stamps came off the presses April 20, 1939... The idea for the first food stamp program has been credited to various people, most notably Secretary of Agriculture Henry A. Wallace and the program's first administrator, Milo Perkins.[6] Of the program, Perkins said, "We got a picture of a gorge, with farm surpluses on one cliff and under-nourished city folks with outstretched hands on the other. We set out to find a practical way to build a bridge across that chasm.” http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supplemental_Nutrition_Assistance_Program Then we had a war economy for a while, so we didn’t need it anymore... The idea was revived by JFK on campaign in West Virginia,; LBJ passed the Food Stamp Act of 1964, which was replaced by the Food Stamp Act of 1977. The stated purpose of this legislation: “To strengthen the agricultural economy; to help to achieve a fuller and more effective use of food abundances; to provide for improved levels of nutrition among low-income households through a cooperative Federal-State program of food assistance to be operated through normal channels of trade; and for other purposes.” http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/leghistory/food-stamp-act-1977 Edit: I should also add that from 1971-1976 we had Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz telling American farmers to “get big or get out.” http://quote.org/quote/get-big-or-get-out-640225 Skipping forward to 1988-2004, the time period when paper food stamps were being phased out and replaced with EBT cards. I can’t find any sources that confirm this right now, but I remember having read that direct-to-consumer food stamp sales declined by almost 70% nationwide during this time because operating a POS machine became a huge barrier to participation for many small farmers who had previously operated by loading up a truck full of produce and parking on a city street corner once a week. Anyhoo, yes there are plenty of farmer’s markets that accept SNAP these days, and some of them offer great incentives, usually through grants provided by the state Department of Agriculture. Sometimes those grants will even cover a modest salary for the market manager who has to create and implement a scrip system for tracking purchases and allotting payments to each vendor at the market. And yes, sometimes the machines are ‘free’, as in the state covers the cost of leasing the machine from the credit card company who permanently owns every single EBT-authorized POS machine in existence and can repossess it any time the volume of sales drops below a certain threshold. That’s part of the reason they offer those “double bucks” programs — if they don’t have enough SNAP income on the books, someone will decide it’s not worth the effort to keep that option available at all. In 2019, 53% of all SNAP benefits were redeemed at “superstores” and <0.1% at farmers markets. http://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snap-boosts-retailers-and-local-economies So the fact that Amazon, WalMart and a handful of other huge corporations are currently the only retailers authorized to process online SNAP payments is much more alarming to me when seen as part of this larger trend. http://www.cfra.org/blog/desk-our-executive-director-get-big-or-get-out-redux
IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 139044 From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate. Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2021 08:19 AM
Yes, the state SNAP offices provide wired EBT equipment, but the USDA is working on a federal contract to provide free wireless EBT technology to all farmers' markets that apply to accept SNAP. The Double Up Your Bucks is a program that is included in and funded by the Farm Bill. Its purpose is to encourage healthier food options (fresh fruits and vegetables) to try to eliminate hunger in poor communities--such as food deserts. The reason most people don't use SNAP at farmers' markets is two-fold: 1. Many people are unaware that this option is available to them. 2. People use SNAP for processed foods and junk food. They can even use SNAP to buy candy! However, they can't buy nutritional supplements! IP: Logged |
Chanterelle Knowflake Posts: 609 From: USA Registered: Sep 2020
|
posted March 04, 2021 08:47 AM
quote: Originally posted by Randall: Yes, the state SNAP offices provide wired EBT equipment, but the USDA is working on a federal contract to provide free wireless EBT technology to all farmers' markets that apply to accept SNAP. The Double Up Your Bucks is a program that is included in and funded by the Farm Bill. Its purpose is to encourage healthier food options (fresh fruits and vegetables) to try to eliminate hunger in poor communities--such as food deserts. The reason most people don't use SNAP at farmers' markets is two-fold: 1. Many people are unaware that this option is available to them. 2. People use SNAP for processed foods and junk food. They can even use SNAP to buy candy! However, they can't buy nutritional supplements!
1. Is true, 2. is also true and doesn’t entirely make sense but is kind of beside the point as far as I can tell. Here’s a store locator for authorized SNAP retailers. I plugged in my ZIP code and set it to a 25-mile radius... there are 29 options available, including 1 supermarket, 1 farmer’s market, and three small stores that definitely sell local products. All the rest are gas stations and convenience stores. http://usda-fns.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=e1f3028b217344d78b324193b10375e4 “The USDA identified around 6,500 food deserts between 2000 and 2006. Experts estimate that around 23.5 million people in the U.S. live in low income areas that are farther than 1 mile to the nearest large grocery store. Of these people, 11.5 million have low incomes.” http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/what-are-food-deserts#definition Personally, I think that using 1 mile as an across-the-board standard is kind of limiting, but that’s what is apparently considered reasonable on average. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 139044 From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate. Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2021 09:04 AM
I think it's a fair definition. A food desert is where a grocery store is more than 1 mile away in urban areas, but one is more than 10 miles away in rural areas. A food desert is a census tract (of 6,529 within the continental United States) where median family income does not meet 80 percent of statewide median family income.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 139044 From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate. Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2021 09:19 AM
There are billions of pounds of fresh fruits and vegetables that go to waste in the US each and every year. Billions! Some of this is at the farm level (a third of all produce grown is plowed over because farmers think they have produced more than the demand) and at the grocery store level (half of all produce is thrown away while still being edible). Some of this is due to misshapen fruits and vegetables. Ninety-seven percent of the 2.1 million farms in the U.S. are family-owned, and 88 percent are considered small farms, so the big agricultural operations that most people associate with farming only make up 3 percent! Grocery stores don't donate this produce, because they are afraid of being sued, but there is actually a law that shields them from liability IF they donate to a nonprofit. We need a nonprofit to set up a farmers' market in each food desert and accept delivery of this produce from small family-owned farms and from grocery stores before it is discarded. IP: Logged |
Chanterelle Knowflake Posts: 609 From: USA Registered: Sep 2020
|
posted March 04, 2021 10:26 AM
Those exist too, and more would be great, but expecting nonprofit charities run by volunteers to solve the whole problem is every bit as unrealistic as expecting the federal government to take care of it all, or expecting everyone to be completely self-reliant. My point is, I have known a fair number of people who understand how the scales have been tipped increasingly in favor of the biggest producers and, especially, the packaging/processing/distribution segment of the food system, and voted for Trump based on a Libertarian-leaning stance toward deregulation. I don’t fully agree with that premise, and I never expected that Trump was actually going to “drain the swamp,” but I can see where they’re coming from. Hypothetically speaking... if the government didn’t subsidize certain commodity crops in the particular way it does, we wouldn’t have this enormous surplus of artificially cheap food laced with high fructose corn syrup in the first place. If there were an army of volunteers and nonprofits dedicated to eradicating hunger, they could go about it lots of ways, and focusing exclusively on making use of what would otherwise be wasted is also kind of perpetuating that wasteful system. If you accept the idea that people should be actively encouraged to eat healthier, then it’s totally counterproductive to regulate consumer choice without addressing the existing policies that encourage the exact opposite.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 139044 From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate. Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 04, 2021 10:40 AM
Oh, I agree. The Farm Bill is a behemoth that causes most of the problems that it seeks to solve. I meant to firm a new nonprofit for the purpose of opening farmers’ markets and creating logistics (using food hubs) to distribute wasted produce to them. There are numerous grants that would cover the initial costs. IP: Logged | |