posted September 14, 2021 09:34 AM            

(A) Rather should the question be sought, my children, are individuals fulfilling those channels to which they have been brought through their own application of the knowledge within themselves to fulfill their position? For each and every one, each and every nation, is led - even as in heaven. For that ye see in earth is a PATTERN of that in the MIND, as ye well know, and is as a shadow of spiritual truth, life and light. Is America as a whole? This is as has been given. If there is not the acceptance in America of the closer brotherhood of man, the love of the neighbor as self, civilization must wend its way westward - and again must Mongolia, must a hated people, be raised.

posted September 14, 2021 01:39 PM            

As I have said before, I am not a Caycite.

Many of his predictions are so nebulous and so vague that they can be interpreted in any way and made to be seen as accurate in any situation.

A lot of his predictions were also made by observant people who didn't claim to be prophet: the 1929 stock market crash, WW2, the rise of Hitler, the fall of the Soviet Union.

As for China, Napoleon reportedly called it a "A sleeping giant" two centuries ago. It's been slumbering for centuries.

posted September 14, 2021 01:49 PM            

Another one whose predictions could be stretched to mean anything and accomodate any major world event.

posted September 14, 2021 02:08 PM            

I admire their ability to plan strategically short term and long term. They are a THINKING people, not ruled by emotions.

I admire their ability to delay gratification and keep their eyes on the prize.

I admire that they are not acting like kings of the jungle, loudly beating their chests about how powerful they are, but instead, go quietly about their business of world domination.

posted September 14, 2021 04:54 PM            

Cayce was a medium, which is always dicey even under the best of circumstances, but he was a trustworthy enough medium. That said, mediumship is an unconscious endeavor by definition, so the communication is inevitably a little nebulous. Much like the Greek oracles.

Civilization does wend westward. We live in the Anglo-American age, preceded by the Greco-Roman age. The Russian age will follow. China has a crucial part to play here, but as an impetus for movement.

posted September 16, 2021 11:15 PM            

And there are many Cayce predictions that are accurate to the year.

For example, the global warming trend becoming first noticed by 1958 and obvious/overt by 1998. Note, not said to be caused by humans, but due to larger cycles, particularly involving the Earth's inner core and Solar cycles. Not well known, but the Sun went into a "Grand Solar Maximum cycle" from about the 50's to around 2000 or so.

If you've seen the Al Gore movie "An Inconvenient Truth" you may remember that he talks about his professor realizing that it was in 1958 that the earth started this warming trend.

Then another prediction was right on the dot, about the magnetic pole shifting and a change in the cycle.

Right after the Carrington Event in 1859, the magnetic poles started to pick up some speed in their wandering. However, it was fairly gradual for a long time. That was until about the 2000 year mark, when the speed sky rocketed from the previous gradual trend. If you look at graphs of especially the north magnetic pole and the speed of its movement, it is quite noticeable the sudden and extreme change.

Cayce's guidance had specifically pointed to that year as being when the poles will have shifted OR a new cycle begins. Indeed, a new cycle did begin then.

During Cayce's time, scientific understanding about the magnetic field and poles was in its infancy.

One doesn't need to be a "Cayeite" to appreciate the truth bombs dropped by this source, it does help to be a scholar of sorts, because in that case, one is speaking from actual study, research, and data and not from hearsay, lack of knowledge, other peoples interpretations, etc.

And the reason why Cayce got so well known in his day and for awhile after was not for the predictions (which are few and far in between), but because he became people's last ditch effort at seeking healing for health problems that mainstream western medicine was not helping them with. There are literally hundreds of signed affidavits of people who sought medical help from this unusual source and received definite help.

Like little Aime Dietrich whose parent's sought readings for her because she went from being a normal, healthy baby, to becoming what we would now call severely intellectually delayed (back then which they called mentally retarded). They had gone to numerous doctors prior to seeking help from Cayce. None could help her and they were basically told to resign themselves to this fate.

After they received a reading from Cayce and put into practice the various recommended treatments, she started to improve more and more. After some more time, she spoke her first words. She ended up going to and graduating from college. Not bad for a girl who as a young child, would spend most of her time staring off into space in a semi catatonic state and who increasingly reacted less and less to external stimuli.

There are many "mini miracles" like this to be found in connection to this work. Harry Houdini who had an obsession with debunking fraudulent mediums and was very good at this job, investigated Cayce and Cayce was the only person of that profession/arena whom he investigated that he never publicly spoke out against. In fact, the highly skeptical Jew may have even been low key influenced by Cayce's work, because shortly before he died, he was working on a movie that he had written that was based on a reincarnational love story. Metaphysically/spiritually, reincarnation was one of the key tenets of that work.

Yeah, sounds real "nebulous" and "vague", all those hundreds of signed affidavits etc? Just like saying that in ancient times, the Nile was in a different location and flowed in a different direction, and this wasn't discovered until advanced satellite imaging found clear evidence of this being true. Or accurately giving information about the Essenes which at the time, contradicted what Biblical scholars and historians believed/taught, but after the Dead Sea Scrolls and various communities were discovered after Cayce's death, Cayce's info was verified to be accurate.

I don't go by "belief", I go by facts, evidence, and holistic logic. There has been nothing like Cayce before or since. Does that mean that this source was infallible and always accurate. No, of course not. Not possible on the material plane unless the person in question is a pure channel of the Source. That is what can lead to perfect objective perception. I haven't met, in a physical way, any humans who are in that category.

And no, Cayce was not a "medium" typically. Classic mediumship is when a person detaches from their body enough to let another consciousness speak through that body. This only happened on very rare occasion. What Cayce did do the majority of the time, was go out of body during his very deep, sleep like meditative trance state (his eyes would go into the REM movement and that's how the person giving the suggestions knew it was time to give suggestions and ask questions), and in his OBE state, he would converse with different spiritual guide types and then relay that info, go directly to the akashic record level and relay that info, and/or communicate with the Soul mind of the person asking the question and then relay that info.

Again, rarely did another entity ever speak directly through him. One of the only entities to ever do so multiple times (2 or 3) was the ArchAngel Michael, and the people who were there on these occasions all noted the same thing. The atmosphere noticeably changed and crackled with intense energy, and Cayce's normally quiet, soft, genial voice boomed.

posted September 16, 2021 11:30 PM            

In other words, NO ONE saw that coming at that time. It would have been considered blasphemy by most. American's main sin then, which had been the sin of many nations at different points, including African ones, was slavery and lack of equal rights.

No one ever thought that America would pull a Britain and try to become an empire and imperialistic force, and would, eventually become hated by many other nations for its bullying, warring, and domineering ways.

posted September 17, 2021 11:46 AM            

Wow, so rich information. I always knew he was in touch with a higher intelligence. He wasn't guessing things or sheer numbers of predictions doesn't mean one of them comes true.

Also I am glad his predictions like the pole shift has not happened. It may have been 80+ years since Cayce and surely the outcome has changed and perhaps we are not in a danger of a pole shift.

posted September 17, 2021 12:06 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by GalacticCoreExplosionV2:
The irony of that reading is that it was given shortly before America's involvement with WWII. During and for a little while after that war, America would become the world's "golden child" for being so integral in helping Europe to fight back against Nazi Germany, imperialistic Japan, and Italy.

In other words, NO ONE saw that coming at that time. It would have been considered blasphemy by most. American's main sin then, which had been the sin of many nations at different points, including African ones, was slavery and lack of equal rights.

No one ever thought that America would pull a Britain and try to become an empire and imperialistic force, and would, eventually become hated by many other nations for its bullying, warring, and domineering ways.

---

I am just not seeing the connection.

America entered WW2 due to the Pearl Harbor attack. But there had been debates in the land before that about whether or not it should enter the war. That possibility had always been on the table. Entering the war, it joined forces with segments of Europe against Nazi Germany, it was a coalition that also included Russia, let's not forget it, that the Russian front was instrumental to defeating Hitler. Some historians have even argued that it was Hitler's inability to take Leningrad after a 900 day horrific siege that cracked his military might.

America as a "Golden Child" after WW2, I don't know. Russia's prestige was at least equally high after WW2 due to its role in defeating Hitler. In fact, many western intellectuals in the US and Europe became communists or communists sympathizers after WW2.

As Russia took over many Eastern countries and became the USSR, an ideological line was drawn and intensified through decades of Cold War until the fall of the Berlin wall.

Again, I am trying to see how Cayce comments can be seen as prediction of things that happened from the 1930s to the 1990s.

posted September 17, 2021 12:55 PM            

Edgar Cayce predicted that the Earth’s magnetic poles would begin shifting in the 1950s and continue to the 1990s.
https://mysteriumacademy.com/edgar-cayces-pole-shift-prediction/

However, the magnetic poles had started shifting before that:
https://www.sciencealert.com/navigation-systems-finally-caught-up-with -the-mysteriously-north-pole-shift

The first expedition to find magnetic north, in 1831, pinpointed it in the Canadian Arctic. By the time the US Army went looking for the pole in the late 1940s, it had shifted 250 miles (400 kilometres) to the northwest.[

posted September 17, 2021 06:11 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Belage:

I am trying to understand, how do you clearly connect Cayce's comment on America and "Mongolia" (whatever was said), and America entering WW2 and participating in the war?

I am just not seeing the connection.

America entered WW2 due to the Pearl Harbor attack. But there had been debates in the land before that about whether or not it should enter the war. That possibility had always been on the table. Entering the war, it joined forces with segments of Europe against Nazi Germany, it was a coalition that also included Russia, let's not forget it, that the Russian front was instrumental to defeating Hitler. Some historians have even argued that it was Hitler's inability to take Leningrad after a 900 day horrific siege that cracked his military might.

America as a "Golden Child" after WW2, I don't know. Russia's prestige was at least equally high after WW2 due to its role in defeating Hitler. In fact, many western intellectuals in the US and Europe became communists or communists sympathizers after WW2.

As Russia took over many Eastern countries and became the USSR, an ideological line was drawn and intensified through decades of Cold War until the fall of the Berlin wall.

Again, I am trying to see how Cayce comments can be seen as prediction of things that happened from the 1930s to the 1990s.

I need predictions to be clearer and more precise.

---

Larger context. Someone had asked about the destiny of America. They (the guidance) were just talking about America before they mentioned "Mongolia". Hence, Mongolia was being connected to possible future America and her destiny, and precisely because the lack of the following, "If there is not the acceptance in America of the closer brotherhood of man, the love of the neighbor as self,..."

Meaning, even then, it was a possibility or probability that future America would fail in its spiritual destiny to be a uniter, and became rather then a divider.

Btw, that is only one small excerpt from that total reading.

posted September 17, 2021 07:00 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Belage:
As for Cayce's predictions on the magnetic pole shifting,

Edgar Cayce predicted that the Earth’s magnetic poles would begin shifting in the 1950s and continue to the 1990s.
https://mysteriumacademy.com/edgar-cayces-pole-shift-prediction/

However, the magnetic poles had started shifting before that:
https://www.sciencealert.com/navigation-systems-finally-caught-up-with -the-mysteriously-north-pole-shift

The first expedition to find magnetic north, in 1831, pinpointed it in the Canadian Arctic. By the time the US Army went looking for the pole in the late 1940s, it had shifted 250 miles (400 kilometres) to the northwest.[

The purpose of my posts is not to cast a bad light on Edgar Cayce. I think he was a remarkable human being and I am grateful that his readings popularized the use of castor oil. I just want to point out that not everything that comes out of the mouth of a medium needs to be taken as gospel.

---

Relatively incorrect on several points, and this is the problem with 2nd hand information rather than directly primary quotes from the actual work itself.

I already explained all this in painstaking detail.

First, the magnetic poles are always wandering/moving to some degree. It was right after the Carrington Event in 1859 that they started to "pick up the pace" some.

However, that trend was pretty gradual until right around the 98 to 2000 mark. Here is the primary reading excerpt that deals most, and singularly, about the poles changing:

"Question: What great change or the beginning of what change, if any, is to take place in the earth in the year 2,000 to 2,001 A.D.?

Answer: When there is a shifting of the poles; or a new cycle begins."(Reading 826-8) given August 11, 1936

As I mentioned earlier, the cycle certainly did change right around the year 2000. It skyrocketed in speed, compared to the gradual trend of increasing in speed of movement since the Carrington Event. The Carrington Event btw, was a very powerful Solar CME that burned up all the telegraph wires and system at the time, and caused auroras to be seen as far south as Cuba. If that Solar storm had happened today, it would have completely collapsed our civilization. It was a very powerful Solar event (these btw, happen on a cyclic frequency of about 150 to 200 years).

However, they also talked about a more general period of the beginning of various changes to be noted from 1958 to 1998, which included a global warming trend to be noticed especially at the polar regions, a general increase of frequency and severity of earthquakes, unusual lights of a spiritual nature being seen again in the clouds (UFO's? These skyrocketed in sightings after the nuclear bombs were dropped on Japan--a little early for this period though), and the shifting of the poles--remember, this 40 year period was only mentioned as the beginning of these various changes.

Here is a graph that illustrates the north magnetic pole speed movement:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_magnetic_pole#/media/File:North_Magnetic_Pole_Speed.svg

It was right around the 1998 (the future year most mentioned by this source, especially as to signifying the larger changes) to 2000 period that the speed started to sky rocket from the previous gradual trend upwards. Hence, a new cycle did begin during this period.

AGAIN, I will stress, that back in the 30's when these predictions were given, science knew very little about magnetic polar wandering and magnetic field changes. They certainly had no idea that the polar shifting would speed up so much towards the end of the 20th Century, nor that the field strength loss would ramp up so much, so rapidly.

Btw, the way that the future works, is not so black and white. There are varying degrees of probability that taper off to varying degrees of possibility as to both specific nature of events AND specific timing. It is very hard to accurately pinpoint exact timing for many things when it comes to future things because of the nature of freewill and how this influences the future. The future is constantly in a state of flux in relation to freewill.

That this source was as accurate as it was about a number of big events that happened a number of decades out from the time of the psychic readings, is remarkable in and of itself.

Belage, respectfully, I have been studying this work for about 2 and a half decades. This work is vast. If all readings were put into a book format, said book would be around 50, 000 pages in length. Do you really think that you know more about this source than I do?

Btw, I'm an not a "Caycite" despite the above. Being an "ite" of any kind, means that one limits themselves to that work. I do not, I have always explored outside of this and other workds. And for the last 12 years or so, have put the most emphasis on going within and directly communicating with guidance.

That is how I could get specific past life information about Cayce's foremost biographer, Sidney Kirkpatrick. He and his wife had received several psychic readings from different people. A particular name kept coming up for him in a past life sense. He does not talk about this to others. I meditated and asked guidance if he had any past life connection to Edgar Cayce and that soul group. I was told yes. After, I asked, could I get a specific name for him. Got one. Told him later, and the look on his face was priceless.

I've had MANY of these kinds of experiences. If I got my butt into gear with regular deep meditation and eating "mummy food", I would start to be able to do consciously, what Cayce had to be unconscious to do. As much as I respect and like the Cayce work, at the end of the day, it is just another set of limiting dogma to me, because I rely primarily on that which comes from within.

posted September 17, 2021 07:16 PM            

It is very obvious and apparent to me that both of you lack a deeper understanding and knowledge of this source.

* In fact, there was an infamous meeting between two very well known psychics at the time, the Irish woman Eileen Garret and Edgar Cayce. They both gave each other psychic readings.

Garret was more of a true/classic medium, and her guide, Uvanni (who spoke directly through her), tried to give Edgar some advice and said that he should allow a spiritual guide like himself to help Edgar, and that if he did that, then he would not be as drained by giving the readings.

Hugh Lynn, Edgar's son, sought a check reading on what Uvanni said. The reply back was somewhat terse and no nonsense. The source asked Uvanni rhetorically, "Does Uvanni claim to know better than the Master that made him?"

In the Cayce work, two things are repeatedly implied and hinted at--that Edgar's work was ultimately the work, and under supervision of, "the Teacher of teachers and the Master of Masters" one Yeshua, the Christ. Two, it was implied/hinted at several times, that the Spirit/Monad that the Soul known as Yeshua came from, was a Co-Creator Spirit, and not just any Co-Creator Spirit, but the first Co-Creator Spirit/fully grown up child of the Source and was the Co-Creator of this particular Universe/larger reality and many of the Spirits within same. Or in other words, many of our Spirits are the direct children of Yeshua's Spirit (not all, but that is a long account).

I.e. Uvanni, was being schooled by Yeshua or someone working directly under Yeshua, and it was stated that Edgar should continue to work in the manner that he was already doing i.e. not classically channeling and being a direct "medium".

posted September 17, 2021 08:30 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by GalacticCoreExplosionV2:
Relatively incorrect on several points, and this is the problem with 2nd hand information rather than directly primary quotes from the actual work itself.

I already explained all this in painstaking detail.

First, the magnetic poles are always wandering/moving to some degree. It was right after the Carrington Event in 1859 that they started to "pick up the pace" some.

However, that trend was pretty gradual until right around the 98 to 2000 mark. Here is the primary reading excerpt that deals most, and singularly, about the poles changing:

"Question: What great change or the beginning of what change, if any, is to take place in the earth in the year 2,000 to 2,001 A.D.?

Answer: When there is a shifting of the poles; or a new cycle begins."(Reading 826-8) given August 11, 1936

As I mentioned earlier, the cycle certainly did change right around the year 2000. It skyrocketed in speed, compared to the gradual trend of increasing in speed of movement since the Carrington Event. The Carrington Event btw, was a very powerful Solar CME that burned up all the telegraph wires and system at the time, and caused auroras to be seen as far south as Cuba. If that Solar storm had happened today, it would have completely collapsed our civilization. It was a very powerful Solar event (these btw, happen on a cyclic frequency of about 150 to 200 years).

However, they also talked about a more general period of the [b]beginning of various changes to be noted from 1958 to 1998, which included a global warming trend to be noticed especially at the polar regions, a general increase of frequency and severity of earthquakes, unusual lights of a spiritual nature being seen again in the clouds (UFO's? These skyrocketed in sightings after the nuclear bombs were dropped on Japan--a little early for this period though), and the shifting of the poles--remember, this 40 year period was only mentioned as the beginning of these various changes.

Here is a graph that illustrates the north magnetic pole speed movement:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_magnetic_pole#/media/File:North_Magnetic_Pole_Spe ed.svg

It was right around the 1998 (the future year most mentioned by this source, especially as to signifying the larger changes) to 2000 period that the speed started to sky rocket from the previous gradual trend upwards. Hence, a new cycle did begin during this period.

AGAIN, I will stress, that back in the 30's when these predictions were given, science knew very little about magnetic polar wandering and magnetic field changes. They certainly had no idea that the polar shifting would speed up so much towards the end of the 20th Century, nor that the field strength loss would ramp up so much, so rapidly.

Btw, the way that the future works, is not so black and white. There are varying degrees of probability that taper off to varying degrees of possibility as to both specific nature of events AND specific timing. It is very hard to accurately pinpoint exact timing for many things when it comes to future things because of the nature of freewill and how this influences the future. The future is constantly in a state of flux in relation to freewill.

That this source was as accurate as it was about a number of big events that happened a number of decades out from the time of the psychic readings, is remarkable in and of itself.

Belage, respectfully, I have been studying this work for about 2 and a half decades. This work is vast. If all readings were put into a book format, said book would be around 50, 000 pages in length. Do you really think that you know more about this source than I do?

Btw, I'm an not a "Caycite" despite the above. Being an "ite" of any kind, means that one limits themselves to that work. I do not, I have always explored outside of this and other workds. And for the last 12 years or so, have put the most emphasis on going within and directly communicating with guidance.

That is how I could get specific past life information about Cayce's foremost biographer, Sidney Kirkpatrick. He and his wife had received several psychic readings from different people. A particular name kept coming up for him in a past life sense. He does not talk about this to others. I meditated and asked guidance if he had any past life connection to Edgar Cayce and that soul group. I was told yes. After, I asked, could I get a specific name for him. Got one. Told him later, and the look on his face was priceless.

I've had MANY of these kinds of experiences. If I got my butt into gear with regular deep meditation and eating "mummy food", I would start to be able to do consciously, what Cayce had to be unconscious to do. As much as I respect and like the Cayce work, at the end of the day, it is just another set of limiting dogma to me, because I rely primarily on that which comes from within.

It's why I don't believe in the traditional reincarnation concept that many true Cayceites DO believe in. Because this source most often spoke about reincarnation in that sense (although, interestingly, there are some curve balls thrown in which contradict same). [/B]

---

I will readily admit to lacking an in depth knowledge of Cayce's work. I have not spent decades studying it like you have, GCE.

posted September 18, 2021 01:36 AM            

Cayce gave hints on how it will come to pass :
http://www.edgarcayce.org/about-us/blog/blog-posts /predictions-from-edgar-cayce-erupting-volcanoes-and-multiple-earthquakes/

posted September 18, 2021 01:42 AM            

Or perhaps they appreciate what Australia is doing in controlling the CV and rewarding them.

posted September 19, 2021 12:23 PM            

But I do believe scientists says the volcano erupts every 750,000 to a million year. We are well past 800,000 years today, I believe. Google please. So it could happen any day.

posted September 20, 2021 10:01 AM            

And apparently, mood of mass human consciousness is linked to the weather on sun. The sun dies obviously we all die instantaneously. But I wonder if sun is the egg and our consciousness is the chicken.

The more angry the masses are , the hotter the sun gets. Cayce perhaps was the first American to note that connection, Dowey was next I think. Alexander Chizhevsky, a Russian was the first human and scientist who discovered the connection but was imprisoned by Stalin for several years for his bizarre theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Chizhevsky

posted September 27, 2021 08:35 PM            

In America, the government policies is targeted towards everyone. We always ask , is my neighbor Joe also getting this benefit? In China, the government is totalitarian and for them blood is thicker than water. No Democracy at all.
Their government is like the Fascist executives of Americas corporates. Average workers just don't like them or have respect for them. They are sheeps doing what a few billionaires commands them to do.

We have to eliminate both of such structures for a new beginning post C19.
Make Pluto, Neptune and Uranus transits your accomplice and you will have all the support you need from Gods. This is what even they want.