posted October 10, 2021 12:45 AM            

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

posted October 10, 2021 12:59 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
Crickets from the peanut gallery?

---

I have a life away from here, you know. Of course you give them a thumbs-up. You don't want to wear a mask, or get vaccinated, but you think you and this country have every right to decide what a woman does with her body. It's disgraceful.

posted October 10, 2021 01:00 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
I'm waiting for states to pass Guardian Ad Litem laws to protect the rights of unborn babies in court proceedings under the 5th Amendment.

[b]"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

But, you're right. Only a few days ago, the decision of an Obama appointed judge was being hailed as a breakthrough on the Texas law. Now, when that decision is trashed by a federal appeals court, it's crickets![/B]

---

And what about the sperm in your body? When will the laws protect them whenever a man jacks off, and all of the little sperm die outside of a "host body" (something a degenerate republican called women).

posted October 10, 2021 10:21 AM            

quote:

---

And what about the sperm in your body? When will the laws protect them whenever a man jacks off, and all of the little sperm die outside of a "host body" (something a degenerate republican called women).

---

posted October 10, 2021 06:49 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
There are more than enough parents looking to adopt. So, why don’t you find another made-up reason to justify the murder of babies?

---

Here's a totally novel idea. Wonder why no one has thought of it before.

DON'T GET PREGNANT UNLESS YOU WANT TO RAISE A BABY!!!!!