posted January 16, 2023 10:10 PM            

Jim Jordan is the House Judiciary Chairman, talking about the brand new Church-style subcommittee investigating the FBI's abuses of power.

Charlie Kirk brought up an important concern with Jim Jordan that House Republicans will focus too much on the Biden crime family and not enough on the Administrative State, which is the real target, and spotlighting the two-tier system of justice.

Jim Jordan:

quote:

---

Good point. Mr. Comer, who will be Chair of the House Oversight Committee will focus in on the Biden issue and the Biden family business operation. We in the Judiciary Committee, our only touch on that will be how the Department of Justice has handled certain things relative to the Biden family. We are more focussed on just this double standard, this treatment of people with a different political persuasion the way that they’re treated different.

---

Case in point would be that no one who illegally demonstrated in front of the homes of Supreme Court Justices after the Dobbs decision was charged vs. Mark Houck, a pro life activist and author, who had his home raided by up to 30 FBI agents and is facing over 10 years in prison for “allegedly pushing a man to the ground outside of an abortion clinic in PA nearly a year ago." The man allegedly harassed Houck’s young son.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/prolife-activist-fbi-raid-abortion-clinic

posted January 17, 2023 05:59 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
Done.

---

posted January 18, 2023 05:47 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by BlueRoamer:
It's only abuse when its your guy being investigated. When its the other guy its justice.

I say investigate both biden and trump, they hold (held) the most powerful office in the world, they should be squeaky clean, thats the standard that they should be held to

---

You make a great point, however, Trump has already been investigated numerous times. Notably, the Mueller investigation which was given special powers, costs millions of tax dollars, took 2 years, only resulted in basically saying there was insufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy to charge Trump.

posted January 19, 2023 03:32 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
If the National Archives had a problem, they were supposed to sue. The raid was an unlawful fishing expedition that used a wholly insufficient and defective warrant that was an excuse to see what could be found about January 6. No, the two cases are not the same.

---

General warrants....and the warrant used in the jackbooted Mar A Lago raid was a 'General Warrant'.... are Unconstitutional.

Fourth Amendment

posted January 19, 2023 10:34 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
Trump was the sitting President. He could declassify anything he wanted to. Biden was only VP.

---

As for the documents at Mar-a-Lago, President Trump had the authority and the right to take these documents under the Presidential Records Act, which is a civil matter. There are no criminal penalties under this statute. But I think the raid also served a political purpose of making it appear that having these documents in his possession was criminal.

Contrast this with Biden. His personal lawyers at an hourly rate of $2,000, who don't have the required security clearances, were on the scene and just happened to find classified documents on the premises. Why would they go there except to retrieve those documents. The FBI has not conducted a search of the crime scenes.

And, they claim they found the documents on November 2, a few days before the mid term elections, and hid the fact. This is election interference.

posted January 19, 2023 11:21 PM            

What struck me about this article is that it lays out the massive pushback that the Administrative State will engage in in order to block public exposure.

quote:

---

House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan and potential House subcommittee Chair Thomas Massie should have a grasp of the scale and scope of the opposition they are about to face. Assuming they have a fully prepared staff to support them – willing to take on a very consequential investigation; then we begin by first anticipating who will oppose their effort to investigate the “weaponization of government“. Which is to say everyone!

---

The other point I find surprising is that the writer advises that the aim of the subcommittee should be public exposure and informing the public, and not accountability.

quote:

---

However, the ultimate goal should NOT BE accountability on those who may have perpetrated or supported weaponized activity against American Citizens. The ultimate goal SHOULD BE for maximum public information, transparency and sunlight about the weaponization as it is discovered.

---

posted January 20, 2023 09:55 PM            

quote:

---

Trump’s cooperation with Biden DOJ won him unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful home raid for (non-crime of) keeping personal copies of his presidential records.

Biden’s collusion with Biden DOJ after classified theft won him 2-month cover up—and no FBI search or interview.

---

posted January 25, 2023 02:22 PM            

Jim Jordan has been appointed as the Chairman of the new House Subcommittee investigating the FBI and Justice Department.

posted February 09, 2023 03:01 PM            

Jim Jordan, Chairman
Stacey Plaskett, Ranking Member

Date: Thursday, February 9, 2023
Time: 12:30 PM

posted February 09, 2023 04:29 PM            

As usual, demorats had a demorat stooge witness at the witness table who didn't disagree with anything demorats said.

On the other hand, republicans destroyed demorat lies, suppositions and illogical conclusions.