Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Proposed constitutional change Issue 1 rejected by Ohio voters, projections shows

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Proposed constitutional change Issue 1 rejected by Ohio voters, projections shows
teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 25069
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 09, 2023 01:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It was rejected. This happened before I woke up.

Now, on to November...

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 175470
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 09, 2023 02:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
So? The whole idea is for the states to decide. You must now agree with the Supreme Court?

IP: Logged

teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 25069
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 09, 2023 06:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
So? The whole idea is for the states to decide. You must now agree with the Supreme Court?

What do you mean, so? No, I don't agree with the supreme court. If it wasn't for them, we wouldn't have had to vote yesterday. LaRose and a small number of others - including a billionaire from ILLINOIS, not Ohio - were funding this, solely to counteract the vote on abortion in November.

That's directly opposed to the will of the people. Our VOTE.

So, why are you not celebrating our win, too? This was a non-partisan win. People from all parties came together to defeat them.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 175470
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 09, 2023 07:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
All the win did was keep the current system of 50 percent for constitutional amendments instead of 60 percent. What is the big deal? 🤷‍♀️ States get to decide what they want to do.

IP: Logged

teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 25069
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 09, 2023 08:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What was I thinking? The people’s vote spoke in 2020, and some republicans chose to ignore the will of the people, because a democrat won.

This was larose going for a blatant power grab. This is something that everyone here should be happy about, but you’re too partisan.

IP: Logged

teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 25069
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 09, 2023 08:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Republicans said “the people of Ohio must be stopped.”

http://twitter.com/TheTNHoller/status/1689393936396169217

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 175470
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 09, 2023 09:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think you get excited over nothing.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2023

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a