Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  Amy Coney Barrett disagreed with the majority over Trump, but admonished the liberals

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Amy Coney Barrett disagreed with the majority over Trump, but admonished the liberals
teasel
Knowflake

Posts: 26805
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 04, 2024 11:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for teasel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Amy Coney Barrett disagreed with the majority over Trump, but admonished the liberals instead

http://www.cnn.com/2024/03/04/politics/amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court-trump-analysis/index.html


Justice Amy Coney Barrett packed two very different messages into her one-page opinion on Monday as the Supreme Court declared states could not toss former President Donald Trump off the ballot.

She chastised her colleagues on the right for breaking significant – and in her mind unnecessary – ground in the breadth of their legal reasoning.

But then she admonished the court’s three liberal justices, who also split from the majority’s legal rationale, in unusually biting terms.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 184176
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 04, 2024 11:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
And? 🤷‍♀️

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 19627
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 05, 2024 12:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by teasel:
Amy Coney Barrett disagreed with the majority over Trump, but admonished the liberals instead

http://www.cnn.com/2024/03/04/politics/amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court-trump-a nalysis/index.html


Justice Amy Coney Barrett packed two very different messages into her one-page opinion on Monday as the Supreme Court declared states could not toss former President Donald Trump off the ballot.

She chastised her colleagues on the right for breaking significant – and in her mind unnecessary – ground in the breadth of their legal reasoning.

But then she admonished the court’s three liberal justices, who also split from the majority’s legal rationale, in unusually biting terms.


What bullshiite.
ALL 9 Justices of the Supreme Court Agreed that states could not remove federal candidates from state ballots.
That all you need to know...PERIOD

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 184176
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 05, 2024 12:28 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This was truly a no-brainer. For all those legal pundits who were blinded by TDS, sorry about your damn luck.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2023

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a