Author
|
Topic: Emma Watson's UN Speech
|
MineAgain Knowflake Posts: 718 From: Registered: Nov 2013
|
posted September 24, 2014 03:37 PM
I promised myself I would stop posting on LL but I couldn't help myself but write something about Emma Watson's UN speech. First and foremost, in no way shape or form am I trying to undermine Ms. Watson's initiative. I absolutely agree with everything she said and her speech was indeed quite powerful (although I'm sure a lot of scholars provided her with their insights when she was in the process of writing the speech). However, "feminism" was often regarded as "taboo" because as she said, it was associted with "men hating". It could be that some men are so self-righteous as to think that "feminism" is a conquest meant to remove all of their powers when in reality, it's got nothing to do with a battle of sexes. The problem is because of Emma Watson's UN speech, most people are now going to "sensationalize" "feminism" and turn it into a trend. So much so that most people taking this so-called "stance" won't even remember what it actually means on a practical and theoritical level. Saying "I'm a feminist" isn't enough to make one a feminist. Feminism is about a political and social involvment towards greater gender equality. Most people are now going to plaster their fantasy of "feminism" without even realizing what such position entails. It's so much more than this simple word. It's about understanding the deep rooted issues linked to gender inequality and take proper action. Most people are now going to think of themselves as "feminists" at night and forget about it the next morning because the truth is a majority are individualists. So long as it doesn't affect them directly, it's easy to forget about this on-going struggle women face daily in this world whether they'd be in the US or in Saudi Arabia. Of course, in some countries gender inequality is far more obvious than in some others and that's why it's so easy to forget about it in our daily routines but I don't want people to believe that "labelling" themselves as "feminists" is going to be enough to make a change. It's not. Emma Watson's initiative is great, there's no doubt about that. The problem is that now, "feminism" is going to be elevated to the level of "trend" (like the ice bucket challenge) and people will have forgotten about it in a couple of months. Using celebrities to raise awareness is a marketing strategy that is only emphemeral. Once the "hype"/"media coverage" ceases, so does people's attention. Am I the only person thinking this speech is a bit of a double-edge sword when it comes to actual long-lasting awareness? Thanks! IP: Logged |
PixieJane Moderator Posts: 5534 From: CA Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted September 24, 2014 04:44 PM
At least in the States, I doubt anyone is going to notice that much. And we're all about the trends anyway with our collective memory hole having the power of a black hole. In any case, I don't think it's going to make much of a difference one way or another. I think the only one she's going to influence are those who are passionate fans, and in their case I expect it will be fairly long lasting, and perhaps the only thing that would get them interested in the first place (be it feminism in general or this specific project). Furthermore, it will get more people to hear it than who otherwise would've so it's not a bad strategy as long as it's only one small part of their plan. Naturally, the HeForShe project will need a lot more than her giving a speech...but I don't believe that her speech is going to have the effect you feared simply because if she's the only reason this project gets attention then it was doomed from the start anyway. (Btw, going by her speech they should've had another name for it as it's "She for he" as much as "He for she." Maybe Humanism?) And for those like me who hadn't even known about it until now: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-iFl4qhBsE Btw, shouldn't this actually be in Aquarius Rising? quote: This Forum celebrates diversity in all its manifestations; may the Aquarian Age bring equality to everyone, and in its dawn, bring an end to racism, sexism, and discrimination of every type
IP: Logged |
hannaramaa Moderator Posts: 8828 From: Registered: Nov 2011
|
posted September 24, 2014 06:36 PM
Sort of on topic, sort of not - I was watching The Talk today (I was at the laundromat, otherwise I never watch it. Most talk shows are mind numbing.) and found myself surprised and feeling insulted when the host previewed the topic of James Franco denying he slept with Lindsay Lohan. Lohan apparently wrote a list of her sexual partners while in / for rehab and it came out. When the host revealed he denied such accusations the whole entire audience clapped. Hard. It made me so mad thinking of all these people just tourists in Studio City, California are sitting there absorbing straight up gossip and rooting for it. And then all the double standards etc. Anyways, sorry to pop in, but carry on. I agree in being worried it's going to turn into a superficial trend just like the fight to end gun violence did. IP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 8767 From: Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted September 24, 2014 08:55 PM
quote: Originally posted by MineAgain: I promised myself I would stop posting on LL
Me, too. It's not working. quote: Originally posted by MineAgain: The problem is because of Emma Watson's UN speech, most people are now going to "sensationalize" "feminism" and turn it into a trend. So much so that most people taking this so-called "stance" won't even remember what it actually means on a practical and theoritical level.
Really?? Hmm. I would be surprised if things turned out that way, but you could be right...I'm not exactly "in touch" with mainstream culture. I sorta naively assume most people are like me, and they don't have the time or interest to read speeches by people like Emma Watson. (Indeed, I have not read her speech.) It's nothing against her specifically...I typically don't read any movie stars' speeches. Why would I? They're actors, not orators. Though I think I did read a Colin Firth speech about fair trade coffee because a) he's hot, and b) I like fair trade coffee. IP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 8767 From: Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted September 24, 2014 08:56 PM
quote: Originally posted by hannaramaa: When the host revealed he denied such accusations the whole entire audience clapped. Hard. It made me so mad thinking of all these people just tourists in Studio City, California are sitting there absorbing straight up gossip and rooting for it.
Yeah that's crazy. IP: Logged |
PixieJane Moderator Posts: 5534 From: CA Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted September 24, 2014 10:28 PM
Btw, some of what she said reminded me of a Nostalgia Critic that I found simultaneously trivial yet profound on why girls prefer "princess" to "queen" and plenty of women actually like being called "girls" while men tend to be insulted if called "boy." From the beginning, which is good IMO (and probably necessary if you're not that familiar with pop culture, Disney movies, and/or popularity of princesses among girls): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAXEQswcv44 That's 10 and a half minutes long. If you want to shave it down to where he gets to the point (having already built up to it) then you can start here: http://youtu.be/jAXEQswcv44?t=6m19s I like that hopeful end (since such movies and shows reflect cultural trends and norms) and I've noticed it myself. I'd like to see where this is going if the world survives without any apocalypses to the year 2050. IP: Logged |
freebrainstorms Knowflake Posts: 1329 From: Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted September 24, 2014 11:37 PM
I'd say everything begins with small steps, the first might be to normalize the word feminist and place it in a different context for the general public. ...just a thought. i think you have a point though.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 46419 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 26, 2014 08:54 PM
What kinds of things did she say?IP: Logged |
PixieJane Moderator Posts: 5534 From: CA Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted September 27, 2014 01:10 AM
She acknowledges her family and nation as being a good place for her to be born, that is she's grateful for her circumstances knowing a great many women can't enjoy such a background and privilege. She'd like that to change so that the benefits she was given was something shared by other females.Even so there were still little things, such as her being called "bossy" when she was 8 for wanting to direct the plays but the boys were not. She also didn't appreciate when the media started to sexualize her when she was 14 (hope she doesn't make the mistake of checking out Harry Potter fanfiction... ). At 15 her female friends started dropping out of their beloved sports teams for fear of developing muscles. And when she thought of herself as a feminist many women rejected her as having a spine (another version of being bossy again), and, of course, man hating. ("Unattractive, even.") She describes parents who didn't love her less for being a girl, schools that expected the same from her as the boys, mentors who didn't assume she'd retire to raise babies made her who she is today, and those influences, male and female, are feminists whether they realize it or not. And if the word "Feminism" still leaves a bad taste then ignore the word and go for the idea that people should be people rather than limited by gender. She does mention that sometimes only women are invited to feminist functions which strikes her as absurd because change can't come about if only half the world is invited. She extends a formal invitation to men (the program she's speaking for) and she says men need gender equality as well. She hates how her father's contributions as a parent is valued less than her mother's by society despite that she needed his presence in her life to become who she is today as much as she needed her mother's. She also goes into men forced to hold in emotions, develop mental illness because they were too scared to ask for help out of fear of appearing "less of a man," and suicide is a major killer of men because of this. Gender stereotypes and ideas have damaged men as well as women. "Men don't have the benefit of equality, either." And that when men are freed from these limitations that equality will spread to women as a natural consequence. If men aren't compelled to be aggressive then women won't be compelled to be submissive. BOTH men and women should be free to be sensitive AND strong. IP: Logged |
PixieJane Moderator Posts: 5534 From: CA Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted September 27, 2014 01:45 AM
Actually, reminds me so much of this song, When I Was a Boy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h00VIlqAl_E Excerpt 1: quote: I won't forget when Peter Pan came to my house, took my hand I said I was a boy; I'm glad he didn't check. I learned to fly, I learned to fight I lived a whole life in one night We saved each other's lives out on the pirate's deck.And I remember that night When I'm leaving a late night with some friends And I hear somebody tell me it's not safe, someone should help me I need to find a nice man to walk me home. When I was a boy, I scared the pants off of my mom, Climbed what I could climb upon And I don't know how I survived, I guess I knew the tricks that all boys knew. And you can walk me home, but I was a boy, too.
Excerpt 2: quote: And so I tell the man I'm with about the other life I lived And I say, "Now you're top gun, I have lost and you have won" And he says, "Oh no, no, can't you see When I was a girl, my mom and I we always talked And I picked flowers everywhere that I walked. And I could always cry, now even when I'm alone I seldom do And I have lost some kindness But I was a girl too. And you were just like me, and I was just like you"
(I had this part of the above post but broke it in half so it would appear easier to read and the above post sums up what was said and this one is a more frivolous take on it.) IP: Logged |
MineAgain Knowflake Posts: 718 From: Registered: Nov 2013
|
posted September 27, 2014 05:46 AM
I watched her speech multiple times. The thread is not about the speech in itself, it's about it's impact on the media and the media coverage it's getting. IP: Logged |
PixieJane Moderator Posts: 5534 From: CA Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted September 27, 2014 06:28 PM
Yesterday is the first time I saw ANY media coverage of it that I didn't have to hunt down. From October 2014 issue of US Weekly: quote: Call for Change Emma Watson, 24, who was recently named U.N. Women Goodwill Ambassador, delivered a powerful speech about gender inequality at the United Nations September 20, calling on all men to become partners in the fight for equal rights for women.
Add in a headshot and that's it. So far I don't think this has even reached a "1" on the Media Impact scale, at least not in the US. 'Course those who actually care enough to search this info out or even have it sent to them through their subscriptions don't really count as they already have strong feelings on the matter. ETA: In comparison, the magazine had more info on Miley Cyrus offending the Mexican government by having one of her dancers spank her with the Mexican flag (and possibly more) as well as things like "25 things you don't know about Paula Deen" (such as not liking goat cheese despite having 3 pet goats, plays game on her iPad, and can't live without Diet Coke). The in-depth articles include things like gossip of the royal family in the UK. But at least they mentioned Emma Watson's speech! I bet readers will comment more on the "SAG Awards" (pix of male celebrities wearing their jeans way too low), however (which, btw, might be commented on by Emma Watson if she deigned to read this magazine, it praises the men to basically showing their butts in undies while giving no praise to Miley Cyrus for showing too much). IP: Logged |
PixieJane Moderator Posts: 5534 From: CA Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted October 14, 2014 05:03 AM
So has this blipped anywhere else? If so, how much media attention was paid to it?To qualify, this must have been shown without being specifically looked for. That is getting anything (emails, publications, etc) dedicated (or opposed) to feminism, the UN, or Emma Watson don't count. Nor is using a search engine to find this. I mean as in a general magazine or paper or news program. If you had to go out of your way to find it then it doesn't count as a blip for the purposes of this thread for there is no hype or media coverage promoted to the masses, the only ones to come across it are those who already have a special (and probably strong) interest in it anyway (and thus unlikely to be influenced).
IP: Logged |
PixieJane Moderator Posts: 5534 From: CA Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted October 27, 2014 09:07 PM
So no significant media blip of her speech and thus no resulting new trend of feminism (look on the bright side, no one can forget it in a couple of months because general society didn't notice it in the first place!). I do believe real life has answered the question.IP: Logged |
aquaguy91 Moderator Posts: 10038 From: Uranus Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted October 27, 2014 09:37 PM
Slow clapIP: Logged |
aquaguy91 Moderator Posts: 10038 From: Uranus Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted November 10, 2014 03:09 PM
I have been reading up on all this #heforshe stuff and all the stuff I've read says men/boys need to become more involved in the issue of inequality because "inequality is a human rights issue that affects everyone" but none of the stuff I've read even makes a passing mention of mens issues, it's all about domestic violence towards women/girls and other womens issues. So how is this anything new? Western countries have been focusing on women's issues for decades and have been giving the average men the middle finger just as long and this #heforshe nonsense is just more of the same.IP: Logged | |