posted October 02, 2019 12:39 PM            

My question is it worth the time to read for asteroids tightly conjunct the outer planets such as Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto? I ask because wouldn't people born the same year have the same asteroid conjunctions?

posted October 02, 2019 01:37 PM            

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.

posted October 02, 2019 01:51 PM            

•Everything Uranus touches, it will either disrupt or give a stroke of genius

•Everything Neptune touches, it will create illusion or give clarity

•Everything Pluto touches, it makes more powerful/intense

posted October 02, 2019 02:33 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by cthonicstar:
Ok, so I'm assuming that:

•Everything [b]Uranus touches, it will either disrupt or give a stroke of genius

•Everything Neptune touches, it will create illusion or give clarity

•Everything Pluto touches, it makes more powerful/intense

[/B]

---

You are so smart. that is genius and you are a natural astrologer!

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.

posted October 02, 2019 04:03 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Nadja:
I don't give as much weight to asteroids conjunct the outer planets, and I demand a tighter orb, especially if the asteroid is also very slow-moving. Some such conjunctions are definitely more generational in nature.

---

Actually, I don't bother with asteroids unless they are within 0-2 degrees in conjunction to a planet or node.

posted October 02, 2019 05:10 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by cthonicstar:
Actually, I don't bother with asteroids unless they are within 0-2 degrees in conjunction to a planet or node.

Which is why I'm asking about generational conjunctions! We agree that general consensus is if it's a slow moving planet and a slow-moving asteroid, it's definitely generational?

---

posted October 02, 2019 05:22 PM            

To be considered 'generational' they need to be a slow mover! Some of what we call "asteroids" are actually considered to be dwarf-planets.

And! There's a planet (Pluto) which is actually a dwarf-planet itself.

- http://space-facts.com/dwarf-planets/

Read this next author's material with a generous sense of humor.
- http://www.philipsedgwick.com/Centaur_TNO/KuiperKeywords.htm

I think the "house-placements" these conjunctions are found in play a big part.

posted October 02, 2019 06:21 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Nadja:
If the planet and the asteroid move at similar speeds along a similar orbit then a planet/asteroid conjunction could last potentially even longer than a conjunction between two outer planets. Asteroids tend to have wonky orbits though, so I don't think that would be the norm. It's not like you keep the orbit of every asteroid in the back of your head though, so I approach all outer planet conjunctions a bit hesitantly. Generational aspects in general can also be personal though, either by aspect to a third personal planet or point... or by synastry or transit. And I'd posit that the same is true with asteroids. I look at other aspects than conjunctions with asteroids too. So long as they are very exact they seem to make themselves known. I stick to a 0-2 degree orb for conjunctions with personal planets or axis, and use 0-1 degree or even just half a degree for generational planets and aspects other than conjunctions.

---

posted October 02, 2019 06:25 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by mirage29:
e.g. 136472 MakeMake, 136108 Haumea; 136199 Eris.

To be considered 'generational' they need to be a slow mover! Some of what we call "asteroids" are actually considered to be dwarf-planets.

And! There's a planet (Pluto) which is actually a dwarf-planet itself.

- http://space-facts.com/dwarf-planets/

Read this next author's material with a generous sense of humor.
- http://www.philipsedgwick.com/Centaur_TNO/KuiperKeywords.htm

I think the "house-placements" these conjunctions are found in play a big part.

---

Thanks for sharing! I enjoyed reading up on the dwarf planets. (Had no idea two were named after Tolkien's Silmarillon characters!)