posted July 20, 2015 08:50 PM            

I have no doubt (or do I have to say: believe) we cease to exist in any form when we die. Also: I found my life back when I left ALL forms of religion (reincarnation / God / any higher power / after life etc. - Oow what a hardcore I've been). So yes, I'm very familiar with the BEEN THERE DONE THAT vibe. Mainly here on this board where I've gotten enough flashbacks of my "past life" (read: 20 years ago). By now I'm pretty used to reading past the """nonsense""" here but now and then also my hair stand on end when reading someone's own personal truth as the ultimate (selfish) one-and-only.

Can't we see there are other views on life? Totally opposing views? Awakened by their personal experience? Can we SEE that without giving those the "ow well / u'll find out one day" label (in thought or word)?

And btw / I have my SN in the 12th in Leo. The EXACT opposite of Auby's with NN 12th Leo.

Isn't that ^ a miracle? A STAR miracle. Seeing her FULL on in the higher vibes while I have left it all? The stars don't lie when it comes to our natural experiences (so the Nodes / no more or less). And religion is just ONE way to experience our human existence.

I thought it would be useful to show a view which is pretty much overlooked here.

posted July 20, 2015 09:18 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aunt Anomalia:
Btw
In case it wasn't clear, by "need to overcompensate with sex" I didn't mean that they should do it or it would help them regain the connection. They'd just end up doing it being driven by unware desperation on the spiritual level. Like a starving man would throw himself at crumbs.

---

posted July 20, 2015 10:11 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by mir:
May I share my black soul for a moment? Thank u sis (great words btw!^ / goosebumps)

.....

---

posted July 20, 2015 10:23 PM            

quote:

---

Why do we all want sex so much? Why is it a core desire, a need, something we lust after?

---

I second Anomalia here. We don't. Not all of us. I don't. I've never experienced sexual attraction. I'm capable of enjoying a sexual relationship built upon emotional bonds and shared psychological and spiritual purpose. True intimacy.

1% of the US population is along the asexual spectrum as of 2012 -- and the number is growing.

posted July 20, 2015 10:40 PM            

not saying that's necessarily what's even being suggested, that the two philosophies are coming part and parcel from the same people necessarily... Just a thought which occurred as I rolled both thought forms/feelings around in my mouth/brain.

But anyway.. That's just a thought of mine. Here's another:

Couldn't sex just be about enjoyment, connection and love? Sometimes? I think so, 7th house Taurus here... I see how it (sex) can be desperate and awful and grasping and gasping and all those things (Scorpio stellium here)..

But I feel like sex positivity is a great thing which has arisen in the public consciousness again, as sacred, as silly, as sexy, as fun... as the grip of certain religions has been loosening it's hold...

I certainly have been of the opinion that sex was somehow unenlightened or--unwise, shall we say... during my periods of celibacy, of course. I can see where those thoughts arose from, and in part my thoughts of superiority during that time were rooted in certain spiritual texts I was reading, which advised against sex in the interest of enlightenment/development of etheric bodies/etc. I'm actually presently on a specific diet which also prohibits sex--but only for 15 days! Which is perfect for me right now, to touch back into my body when I'm not using that energy willy-nilly. I definitely like the idea of sex being very conscientious and deeply felt; I'm also not averse to keeping it light and not being too strict about where its going, because I've found trying to restrict the forms of expression i accept from my partner or which i express can limit us and if i let it glue amazing things (the things i wanted! Love, non judgment deep connection!)-- can happen. So i guess I'm more into the tantric idea these days.. But anyway...

posted July 21, 2015 02:10 AM            

Yun: Get very familiar with your NYMPHE (875) if you haven't yet. Trust me on this one. If it's about sex-positivity and reclaiming sexuality as a natural, liberated experience, then NYMPHE is it. Contrary to some statements, it's not sex addiction or nymphomania. It's simply sex free of guilt, abuse, control issues, and all which 'corrupts and taints' the experience.

mir: I appreciate you sharing your experience; I definitely vibe more to the general understanding that there is no one singular answer or approach. However, I came to a very different comprehension of the nature of time -- as a result of my upbringing in a metaphysical household, and then my decades of studying various branches of science -- especially modern (and, of course, classical) physics. I concur with your statement that 'it's all magnetism'. But I'll amend it with my own 'experience'.

My understanding is such that, yes, we're all correct to some degree. The multiverse is holographic in nature, and we are the ultimate projectors. 'Objective' reality is nothing more than majority rule. The more that one embraces their multidimensionality, the more they will come to experience it. Usually in a fashion easier for the brain to process; for me, it's via dreaming. My rational mind demands that it 'fit' with the internal schema which I carry around that requires my perceived reality not differ too wildly from the one experienced by the majority. (But in terms of my 'dreaming life'? Sometimes I really do think I must be a Time Lord. But that's a topic for another day!)

Is there 'life after death'? Well, it's the journey -- not the destination -- that's of primary significance. It's the search, the debate, the experience. Nothing exists, scientifically-speaking, but the present. The now. No past, and not a future, either. It's all the same, experienced as a single dimension: the linear, progressive present. So 'past lives' truly are a misnomer in my view. It's all simultaneous. Karma is merely actions across the board which affect each other.

So, for me, it's about the fine-tuning of the understanding of multidimensionality. I'm not totally sure why, but it's inundated my life since my early twenties, in some form; got kicked off in my teens, and now, in my thirties, I'm learning how exactly to utilise my creative talents to share it with the greater population -- in a way that's worked for the past half-century: scripted television.

It is intriguing that my 12H NNODE seems to reflect this calling; to use my creative passion in a very dedicated, solitary purpose to bring a sort of enlightenment.

Even more bizarre is how my boyfriend / costar / partner's NNODE's Huber degree is 0° conjunct it -- while also having its actual sign be Taurus -- and 0° conjunct his SCHRODINGER. Now how's that for the principle of simultaneity?

SNODE in Aquarius in the 6H jibes as well; belonged to a greater consciousness rather than possessing a distinctive identity; true individuality.

Anyhow. These are my thoughts as a scientist. As I mature, I'm surprised how they're not as difficult to reconcile with my 'beliefs' as an astrologer. Not as much as they once were -- it seemed to be. I'm really appreciating it, too.

Lately, I'm seriously considering the theory that twin flames are merely quantum based; rather than the more widely 'accepted' supernatural explanation, simply the presence of one entity -- almost as if by epigenetics -- representing two separate hologrammes of itself -- one masculine, one feminine. (That may not be limited to the actual number of two, incidentally, which has been a sticking point.)

posted July 21, 2015 09:34 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aubyanne:
By the way, Anomalia:

I'd like to know you better. We have a lot in common, it would seem. Email me, if the fancy strikes.

---

There's no adress in your profile though.

posted July 21, 2015 09:55 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aunt Anomalia:
There's no adress in your profile though.

---

posted July 21, 2015 04:41 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aubyanne:
[b] I second Anomalia here. We don't. Not all of us. I don't. I've never experienced sexual attraction. I'm capable of enjoying a sexual relationship built upon emotional bonds and shared psychological and spiritual purpose. True intimacy.

1% of the US population is along the asexual spectrum as of 2012 -- and the number is growing.

Trying to understand sex is a big part of why I'm here; as well as the obstacles to intimacy. In some ways, rethinking our concept of sex entirely. It's rather myopic. I'm hoping to expand it, taking fully into account the vastness of possibility and potential.

---

I'm talking about the 99% since they are part of the ones making sure their desires are ruling the way the majority of people function, which they keep our thoughts based on core desire, or primal desires/urges instead of helping us find our higher vibrations. It's the rare person that doesn't fall for their crap.

posted July 23, 2015 12:07 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ceridwen:
No fight on my thread please!!!!
Can`t I go on a short trip without a fight breaking out?
I have not read it all through, but I assumed, everything`s been sorted out, yes?

Thank you, Aubyanne, for keeping an eye on this thread.

---

posted July 24, 2015 10:54 AM            

Not trying to rush you or anything. In case you didn't notice for some reason, I've already sent a message.

posted July 24, 2015 12:11 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ceridwen:
No fight on my thread please!!!!
Can`t I go on a short trip without a fight breaking out?
I have not read it all through, but I assumed, everything`s been sorted out, yes?

Thank you, Aubyanne, for keeping an eye on this thread.

---

posted July 24, 2015 12:12 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aunt Anomalia:
Aubyanne

Not trying to rush you or anything. In case you didn't notice for some reason, I've already sent a message.

---