quote:
Originally posted by yungang_grotto:
I have it by sign (Virgo-Pisces) and I'm predisposed towards thinking it is complementary to have the opposition
We also have a Juno-Amor opposition. AanyhowAn opposition in synastry often means a powerful attraction and a vibing with often complementary energies; though opposites in terms of their needs and wants these two people will have qualities which are immediately recognizable as magnetic in relation to the other in terms of navigating partnership, equality, etc.
By sign and house we'll have the areas of life/psyche/qualities which are being expressed. It really depends on sign and house when interpreting oppositions.
Think of Sun opposite Sun, any like planet in opposition with the other. How does that play out? It can create a struggle, a very dynamic urge to focus on that planet. It is kind of like a double whammy in its significance, I believe.
The midpoint of the two Junos is going to form a square to both personal planets in the composite chart. This is significant I think in understanding the potential for tension which can arise from same-body oppositions in synastry. There will always be a square to that planet from the natal of each to the composite planet. So automatically a tension, an active element is present. I've not been reading natal squares to the composite planets as negative lately; I interpret them as simply demanding something of the person in terms of their planets.
Would be interested in hearing other takes on this..
so... squares from the natals to the composite as not negative? It makes sense with a composite (midpoints).
What about the Davison though? what is the impression people have on squares from natal to Davison?