posted June 10, 2007 03:42 PM         

Love & {{{ hugs }}}

posted June 10, 2007 04:05 PM         

Here's what I would say, "I love you guys too" even though I'm not really addressing EXACTLY what you said, I feel I am addressing the sentiment, and I think everyone will accept me as I am in this moment, which I guess is what I mean and why I said it.

posted June 10, 2007 04:10 PM         

ILWL, your mars/merc conjunction in aqua definitely counts,
although it can be combative and stubbornly hold to false opinions,
kind of like my mars/merc in sag, except sag is mutable,
and my conjunction is sextile my moon and trine jupiter.

If you want to compare Aquarian influences:

Sun Conjunct Uranus
Venus Conjunct Uranus
Midheaven Conjunct Uranus (by 16 minutes)
Saturn Sextile Uranus
Uranus is the apex planet of a Yod
Moon in Aquarius (in harmonius aspect to mars and mercury)
The entire sign of Aquarius in my 1st house

posted June 10, 2007 04:16 PM         

Astrology is a tool, nothing more, when the tool controls, and you only think from the Tool, you are limiting yourSelf. Your chart is to be overcome, not run your life and thoughts!

posted June 10, 2007 04:22 PM         

Thanks Lotus. {{{HUG}}}

posted June 10, 2007 04:31 PM         

Everyone who has spoken against me thinks they are more humble than me.

That's a fact.
I dare you to admit it
and I dare you to deny it.
I dare you not to ignore it.

But this is not counted for arrogance.

Instead, my conviction is taken for arrogance.

I am convinced of a spiritual matter.
You are convinced of your humility.

But I am arrogant? Right.

So, what has really happened?

I have spoke words that humbled you,
and your pride cries out in indignation.

But you don't see it.

Everyone speaking against me now is saying more aggressive and mean-spirited things than anything I have said. But you don't see it.

All I am saying is that a person who has developed their compassion to the point of feeling equal love for all beings, or anyone beginning to approach this point, will sooner adopt a child who is already here and needs a loving home, than bring another into the world. ((That is what I think. Now, I am going to tell you WHY I think it - and, no, I dont believe I am going above and beyond the call of duty.)) Such a person would feel equal love for other people's children, and, loving them as if they were one's own, would sooner adopt. This makes perfect sense. Imagine you are a mother, and there was a mix-up, and your child got sent to an orphanage. Would you have another child, or try to adopt the child you already have? Answer the question. I dare you. You would try to adopt the child, you would be heartbroken for that child's sake. Now, imagine you have developed your love to the point where it is utterly impersonal and selfless. Suddenly, every orphan in the world feels like your child, and you want to care for them just as you would want to care for your child. This is what I am talking about. I dare anyone to argue this matter with me, without letting this thread continue to degenerate.

Imagine the kind of highly evolved person I am talking about. Imagine someone as selfless as that. You do agree that is profound selflessness, don't you? Do you think you are that selfless? Do you think no one is more selfless than you? Are you in total denial? Can you not bear the thought that, in comparison with such a compassionate soul, you are indeed "selfish"?

That is arrogance, if anything is.

Please, read over your responses to me, and the responses to me from those you call allies and harbingers of love and humility. Read what they are saying to me. Try to be objective.

Fayte tells me she would be kicked off LL if she said what she wishes to say to me. That says it all, doesn't it?

I have no ill will towards any of you.
I have no desire to spew profanities at anyone.

But I'm the bad guy.

Okay.

Look, folks, I'm done here.
I'll be back to see if anyone is discussing the facts.
If not, I will not take part in this farce any longer.

HSC

posted June 10, 2007 04:32 PM         

Love to you, and everyone, as well.

posted June 10, 2007 04:37 PM         

I missed the point?

You and fayte both tried to dismiss my thoughts on Aquarians by comparing your own Aquarian influences to mine. If it is beside the point, you and fayte got us off track, not me.

I took you two up on it,
I proved I am more Aquarian,
and now it is "beside the point".

I hear what you are saying about the shadow side.
My point was that, even the lighter side of Aqua
exhibits many of the things which you seem to reject.

posted June 10, 2007 04:51 PM         

Heart-Shaped Cross, I don't understand your question? Of course we would go after the child that was sent away by mistake, that child is our responsiblity, that does not mean we would not want another child that is not biologically ours, I would LOve both children equally, at this point in my Life, perhaps before now, I may have selfishly LOved my own flesh and blood more, but not now, knowing what I know! Does that make sense?

posted June 10, 2007 05:09 PM         

*asks herself the question- how can someone with the purported IQ of a genius be so dumb?*" <-quote by ILWL

That is complete crap and you know it.

posted June 10, 2007 05:19 PM         

Did it occur to you HSC, that these orphans incarnated where they did for a reason? Maybe one of them will change the adoption system, or perhaps make a difference in Africa regarding the AIDS epidemic, due to the experiences they had growing up in that environment. Or they might be another genius Who knows what might be.

quote:

---

Where I was born, and to whom I was born, have been the catalysts for my personal growth as a being, and to become open to many truths, instead of only “one right truth”. ~ GG

---

Did it occur to you that the way Pixie feels about her baby, is the way that all women feel about their children? They would have a similar reaction as Pix upon reading what you wrote?

I don't entirely disagree with what your wanting to express here. Who gets to decide who's the most enlightened who get to reproduce naturally? What are the criteria for enlightenment? I just feel that there might be a better or more Aquarian if you will, solution to the unwanted children issue. maybe we could discuss that instead.

Peace.
GG

posted June 10, 2007 05:21 PM         

quote:

---

He clearly hadn't read the entire thread and was just responding/reacting to previous angry and hurtful comments.

---

posted June 10, 2007 05:34 PM         

quote:

---

It's really like the Twilight Zone,
how you gals can't see the negativity in your words,
and you pressume to lecture me on things you are more guilty of yourselves.

---

He does seem to that pretty often, doesn't he? responding without reading what the other person actually said ?

Where, oh where, is the mean-spiritedness he is talking about? Could you kindly point me to it ?

Bullsh1t.

When 10 people say the same thing, my humble opinion is that one should listen. I see no evidence of that here.

And so i give up.