posted January 23, 2009 08:02 PM         

welcome to WW3, courtesy of Barry Obama. grrrrrrr

sorry guys, l know a lot of you are American but it is absolutely unacceptable to bomb Pakistan like that as there is little terrorism anyway, it's just an excuse for other reasons - ALL of them MONEY-orientated.

posted January 23, 2009 08:18 PM         

quote:

---

Pakistan publicly protests the strikes in the northwest as violations of its sovereignty that often kill civilians and undermine its own campaign against terrorists that have also launched bloody attacks on domestic targets.

But many observers believe the government secretly agrees with the tactic and may provide intelligence on the targets, noting that Islamabad’s admitting to assisting the attacks would be politically damaging.

---

posted January 23, 2009 11:15 PM         

That's a rather hysterical statement.

I don't watch US news. I read it online. I also read international papers, and watch international news on the satellite.
You can't BLAME a single person in this instance, Lara, and say it's all Obama. WTF. The guy just got here and you're already bashing him?
There are MANY problems in the US, but I'm not about to point my fingers at the government only. I'm much more willing to bash the hell out of the lobbyists as well

posted January 24, 2009 12:21 AM         

I'm not bashing him... i'm moaning at the people who voted for Obama when he is simply a puppet for the US Govt.
I like Obama! dear god... whatever happened to freedom of speech?

BTW, it is a highly researched view! There isn't any Al Queda - it's a computer programme :s

I'm just sad that Obama has towed the line so quickly into his Presidency by bombing Pakistan and supporting Israel ovr the Gaza conflict.

posted January 24, 2009 12:36 AM         

How can you say this when pretty much every US President has had to deal with "crap from all the remaining insanity"

It never ceases to amaze me how little we remember about History, don't you agree?

It also never ceases to amaze me how some people advocate for "peace" and then they themselves, gang up and ***** using snidey little remarks! lmao

posted January 24, 2009 02:09 AM         

quote:

---

I'm just sad that Obama has towed the line so quickly into his Presidency by bombing Pakistan and supporting Israel ovr the Gaza conflict.

---

posted January 24, 2009 04:01 AM         

David Icke actually summed it up for me in his newsletter when he said:

quote:

---

This is a man that after saying nothing about the mass-slaughter in Gaza for a month had the nerve and mendacity to deliver these words (in his speech):

'We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defence, and for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.'

Unless you are Israel.

---

posted January 24, 2009 10:59 PM         

First off, he was never legally eligible to be the President of the United States. He is currently being sued in the Supreme Court for refusing to show his birth certificate -- except for an inadmissable document, online, the veracity of which is in serious doubt.

Secondly, he wasn't elected, he was selected, as have been many past Presidents, with the trend worsening toward recent times. For sure, at least the last five elections were decided before a single vote was cast. Remember, "those who vote decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." As a computer programmer, I can assure you that computerized voting is the least secure method possible.

But before voting scams, there is the fact that for the past almost century, all of our Presidential nominees have belonged to the same handful of secretive, international, and quasi-governmental groups: the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, the Bohemian Society, and the Skull & Bones Society at Yale university. It is to these groups that the Presidents are truly loyal, just like national leaders and other key political figures around the globe.

In other words, it doesn't matter if you elect Talking Head A or Talking Head B, either one is a member of the same club and has the same overall agenda.

Obama is no hero, savior, or messiah, though he was chosen for his Hitler-like ability to move the crowd. He's a snake-oil salesman, so good at his job you'll order a million gallons of misery from him and sit at the mailbox waiting eagerly for the sea of "liquid sunshine" he promised.

He's here to sell you the one-world government, or the current bid for world domination by the rich and powerful. Instead of Alexander the Great or a Roman Ceaser, we have the Corporatocracy.

Just follow the money, because money is power in our world. Look up the Rothschilds. Look up the Carlyle Group. Hell, look up anything, but please don't just grab a handy and convenient belief in something without a solid foundation of fact for it, okay?

posted January 24, 2009 11:37 PM         

A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "set up a straw man," one describes a position that superficially resembles an opponent's actual view, yet is easier to refute. Then, one attributes that position to the opponent. For example, someone might deliberately overstate the opponent's position.[1] While a straw man argument may work as a rhetorical technique—and succeed in persuading people—it carries little or no real evidential weight, since the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.[2]

posted January 25, 2009 01:26 AM         

The validity of his birth certificate is in doubt only by those who essentially hope that they're correct. Otherwise, fact-checking agencies like factcheck.org and politifact.com as well as courts involved with this matter have all been dismissive of the idea altogether. This article claims the Supreme Court itself has thrown out at least eight separate appeals on this subject, and it's currently a more Conservative court.